ObjectiveTo explore the progresses of diagnosis and treatment for endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). MethodsThe literatures on studying the classification, diagnosis and management, risk factor, and treatment for the endoleaks after EVAR were reviewed and analyzed. ResultsEndoleak was a common and particular complication after EVAR and its represented persistence meant failure of the EVAR treatment. Accurate detection and classification were essential for the proper management and the treatment method for the endoleak was determined by the different source. Type Ⅰ and type Ⅲ endoleak required urgent treatment， type Ⅱ and type Ⅴ were considered less urgently but may be observed continuously. A variety of techniques including extension endografts or cuff, balloon angioplasty, bare stents, and a combination of transvascular and direct sac puncture embolization techniques were allowed to treat the vast majority of these endoleaks. ConclusionsEndoleak after EVAR is still the main clinical problem to be solved. The characters of endoleak still are not fully revealed. The diagnosis and treatment remained equivocal, which requires further study.
Objective To summarize selection of therapeutic method for isolated iliac aneurysms and analyze its advantages and disadvantages. Method The clinical data of 21 patients with isolated iliac aneurysms from January 2006 to January 2017 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Results Four patients were treated with an open surgery such as the unilateral iliac prosthetic graft interposition, aorto-biiliac or aorto-bifemoral arterial bypass graft, ligation of internal iliac artery, etc.. Seventeen patients were treated with an endovascular treatment such as the unilateral iliac stent-grafts, bifurcated aortic stent-grafts, or coil embolization alone, etc.. One patient with ruptured isolated iliac aneurysms died during the endovascular repair, and the rest patients were cured after the operation. The average operative time was 2.83 h and 1.58 h, the average hospital stay was 17.5 d and 7.7 d respectively for the patients with the open surgery and the endovascular treatment. Except 1 case of type Ⅰ and 1 case of type Ⅱ endoleaks were found in the patients with the endovascular treatment, no complications such as the ureteral and intestinal injuries, the gluteal muscle claudication, and the sigmoid ischemia were found in all the patients. Seventeen cases were followed-up. The following-up rate was 85%. The following-up time was 1–60 months with an average of 22 months. During the following-up period, the grafts and stent grafts were patent and the aneurysm sac diameter was unchanged. The abscess of the iliac fossa occurred in 1 patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and improved after the symptomatic treatment. Two patients died of other diseases during the following-up period, and the rest had no obvious clinical symptoms. Conclusions Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that endovascular repair and open surgery in treatment of appropriately selected patients with isolated iliac artery aneurysms is safe and effective. But in special situation, technical controllability of open surgery might be better than endovascular repair, treatment should be selected according to patient’s general condition and anatomy of aneurysm.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of treating type Ⅱ endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms with coil embolization. Methods A retrospective review of patients with type Ⅱ endoleaks treated with coil embolization was performed. Data regarding the technical, clinical, and imaging outcomes during perioperation and followed-up were collected. Results The technical success rate and the initial clinical success rate of treating type Ⅱ endoleaks with coil embolization were 100% (14/14). The mean operating time was (124.3±11) min, a mean of (127±15) mL contrast agent and a mean of (7±2) coils were used. During perioperation, one patient suffered left limb paralysis, all the patients were discharged with no perioperative mortality. Twelve patients were followed-up. During the period of 3 to 57 months of followed-up (average: 17.3 months), Type Ⅱ endoleaks reoccurred in one patient with coil embolization of the feeding vessels alone and two patients with coil embolization of the aneurysm sac alone. Since the aneurysms did not enlarge during the followed-up, these 3 patients continued followed-up without reinterventions. Conclusion Treating type Ⅱ endoleaks with coil embolization appears to be safe, and it can prevent aneurysm sac enlargement effectively. Because of the high risk of reoccurrence, follow-up after embolization is important.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of in situ fenestration combined with chimney technique in the treatment of aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery.MethodsFrom January 2012 to June 2019, 53 patients with aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery were selected. There were 21 patients in the test group, including 14 males and 7 females, with an average age of 57.2±11.2 years; there were 32 patients in the control group, including 20 males and 12 females, with an average age of 56.7±12.1 years. In the test group, the left subclavian branch was reconstructed by in situ fenestration and the left common carotid artery was reconstructed by chimney technique. In the control group, the left common carotid artery was reconstructed by hybrid operation. The clinical data of the patients were compared.ResultsThe operation time of the test group was significantly longer than that of the control group (151.8±35.2 min vs. 101.3±29.6 min, P=0.00). The patients in the two groups were followed up for 6-20 months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of pulmonary infection, stroke, steal blood syndrome, false lumen thrombosis or internal leakage between the two groups (P>0.05). The diameters of the distal and proximal ends of the true cavity in the test group increased significantly compared with those in the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionIn situ fenestration combined with chimney technique is an effective method for the treatment of aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and endovascular abdominal aortic repair have now become the first-line treatment options for aortic stenosis and abdominal aortic disease, respectively. For patients with both diseases, combined procedures have been reported in a few domestic and foreign publications. However, all the procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Here, we reported a case of simultaneous minimalist transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement and endovascular repair of the abdominal aorta for a 78-year-old male patient with aortic stenosis and abdominal aortic ulcer, and the surgical results were satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo determine the influence of proximal aneurysm neck anatomy on typeⅠA endoleak follo-wing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. MethodsFrom September 2007 to February 2014, 111 consecutive patients with non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were treated with EVAR. The preoperative CTA of abdominal aortic was obtained by every patient, and the three-dimensional imaging was reconstructed and measured by software of Osorix. Then, the relation between the recurrence of typeⅠA endoleak and the concerned data measured by Osorix was analyzed by the statistical software. ResultsThe recurrence of typeⅠA endo-leak was related to the proximal neck angle of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, which weren't related to the proximal neck diameter and variation rates, the mural thrombas and calcification rate, and the maximum diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm by multivariate analysis. ConclusionsThe complicated proximal aneurysm neck anatomy is a major cause for the typeⅠA endoleak, the proximal neck angle of the abdominal aortic aneurysm is the independent factor. The applica-tion of EVAR depends largely on the shape of the proximal aneurysm neck.
Objective To observe the effects of sarpogrelate hydrochloride in prevention and treatment for ischemia of gluteal and limb following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm （EVAR）. Methods Clinical data were analyzed in 174 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm （AAA） who underwent EVAR from January 2006 to January 2011. The patients’ mean age was （71.8±8.2）years old （male： 148 cases， female： 26 cases）. The diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm was （55.2±12.9） mm. AAA involving common iliac artery was in 52 （29.9%） patients. Bifurcated endografts and aorto-uni-iliac （AUI） endografts with crossover bypass were used in 169 patients （97.1%） and 5 patients （2.9%）， respectively. Sarpogrelate hydrochloride were used in 39 patients with gluteal and limb ischemia due to exclusion of bilateral and unilateral internal iliac arteries among 174 patients. Sarpogrelate hydrochloride， 100 mg， three times daily，was taken for 2-4 weeks. Symptoms of gluteal and limb ischemia were followed-up.Results All of patients with AAA was repaired by EVAR successfully and no conversion to open repair. General anesthesia 〔50.6%（88/174）〕， epidural anesthesia 〔30.0%（52/174）〕， and local anesthesia 〔19.5%（34/174）〕 were used. Blood loss was （125.2±43.1） ml and no blood transfusion during operation. Operative time was （145.5±38.7） min, ICU stay time was （14.7±5.2） h， and postoperative fasting time was （7.2±4.3） h. The duration of postoperative hospital stay was （9.1±2.7） d. The perioperative complication rate was 12.6% （22/174）. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.1% （2/174）. Gluteal and limb claudication occurred in 2 paients and 5 patients respectively among 29 patients with EVAR due to exclusion of unilateral internal iliac artery， intermittent claudication distance was 100-200 meters. Gluteal muscle pain and limb claudication for less than 200 meters occurred in 4 patients due to exclusion of bilateral internal iliac artery. The symptoms were relieved after Sarpogrelate hydrochloride， 100 mg， three times daily， was taken for 2-4 weeks. No gluteal gangrene occurred and claudication distances were more than 500 meters when walking， no any interventional and surgical procedures were required， all of them were doing well for median 16.1 months follow-up period. Conclusions Sarpogrelate hydrochloride has definite effects on prevention and treatment for gluteal and limb ischemia following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm，especially for exclusion of bilateral and unilateral internal iliac arteries during EVAR
目的 总结肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术的初步经验。 方法 对我院2006年8月至2009年3月期间收治的10例肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤患者在全麻下采用单侧或双侧股动脉入路置入带膜支架行腔内修复术。 结果 10例肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤采用腔内修复治疗，带膜支架置入顺利，立即DSA 7例动脉瘤体消失，Ⅰ型内瘘2例，经支架附着点球囊扩张后内瘘即刻消失。随访3～30个月(平均10个月)，2例术后切口淋巴瘘，经换药痊愈。全部患者肢体血运正常。1例发生Ⅱ型内瘘，未经治疗，随访2个月后消失。 结论 腔内修复术对肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤是一种创伤小、恢复快及效果好的治疗方法。
ObjectiveTo retrospective summarize the experience of endovascular repair and open surgery in the treatment of renal aneurysms in our single center.MethodsClinical data of 24 patients with renal aneurysm treated in our hospital from August 2012 to May 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Nine patients undergoing surgical intervention were categorized as the open operation group, and ten patients who received endovascular repair were classified as the endovascular repair group. To compare and analyze the results of the two groups. Five patients who had refused surgery therapy will be analyzed separately.ResultsTwenty-four patients with seventeen females (70.8%) and seven males (29.2%) were enrolled in this study and nineteen patients with twenty-three aneurysms got repaired successfully. The endovascular repair group had shorter hospital stay compared with the open operation group [median: 10.5 (P25 6.3, P75 15.0) d vs. 21.0 (P25 17.0, P75 27.5) d］. One patient in the open operation group developed renal artery stenosis at 11 months after surgery and underwent reoperation by repair by successful stent placement. There were no other significant postoperative complications occurred in the two groups. No abnormal enlargement or rupture of the aneurysms were observed during the follow-up period in 5 unoperated patients.ConclusionsBoth open surgery and endovascular repair are effective means of treating renal artery aneurysms. Once the renal aneurysm ruptures, serious consequences will occur. Once a renal aneurysm is diagnosed, regardless of the size of the aneurysm, active surgical treatment is recommend.
Objective To evaluate the importance of "one-stop" hybrid operating room in the individualized treatment of aortic pathology. Method We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 247 patients of aortic pathology who were operated in the hybrid operating room in our hospital from January 2013 through December 2014. There were 193 males and 54 females at age of 24-83(54±12) years. Results Thoracic or abdominal endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR/EVAR) was applied in 132 patients, including 122 simple patients and 10 complexes. Fenestrated TEVAR was applied in 61 patients. Hybrid operation was done in 54 patients. Perioperative death occurred in 9 patients (3.6%). Perioperative complication rate was 11.7% (29/247) . The patients were followed up for one year. During follow-up, five patients were dead. The one-year survival rate was 98.0% (242/247) . Conclusions "One-stop" individualized treatment of aortic pathology shows its advantage, yet long-term result still needs to be followed up.