Objective To elucidate the clinical features and treatment of parapneumonic effusions ( PPE) . Methods Ninety-seven patients were analyzed retrospectively in Guangzhou First Municipal People’s Hospital fromJanuary 2004 to July 2008. The data of 54 patients with complicated parapneumonic effusion ( CPPE) and 9 cases with empyema were compared with 49 patients with tuberculosis pleural effusions. Results Of 97 cases, 34 patients with uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion ( UPPE) were treated with antibiotics only, whose hospitalization time was ( 14. 8 ±7. 6) days, and 27 cases were cured ( 79. 4% ) . Of 54 CPPE patients, 42 were treated with antibiotics and pleural space drainage with central venous catheter, whose hospitalization time was ( 21. 7 ±13. 0) days, and 32 were cured ( 76. 2% ) . Another12 CPPE patients were treated with interapleural urokinase and drainage from the chest tube, whose hospitalization time was ( 22. 5 ±9. 3) days, and 8 were cured ( 66. 7% ) . Nine cases with empyema were rinsed the pleural with metronidazole solution, whose hospitalization time was ( 25. 7 ±17. 4) days, and 8 were cured( 89. 0% ) . Compared with the tuberculous pleurisy patients, most CPPE and empyema occurred in middle and old aged patients with an average age of ( 63. 3 ±19. 3) years. Polykaryocyte and lactate dehydrogenase increased significantly. Adenosine deaminase ( ADA) was lt; 45 U/L in most UPPE and empyema patients, but was gt; 45 U/L in 7 cases ( 11% ) . Conclusions UPPE is simple and preferably treated with antibiotics alone. While CPPE and empyema should be drainaged as early as possible, and the low-dose urokinase may be helpful. The level of ADA can not absolutely distinguish parapneumonic effusion from tuberculous pleural effusion.
Objective To investigate the value of tumor type M2 pyruvate kinase ( M2-PK) in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion. Methods A total of 146 patients with pleural effusion during January 2006 to December 2008 were recruited at the department of respiratory medicine of the Shantou Affiliated Hospital and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen Medical College. Pleural effusion was malignant in 72 cases ( 52 cases with lung cancer and 20 cases with metastatic lung cancer) and benign in 74 cases ( 54 cases with infective pleural effusion and 20 with transudation effusion) . The patients were divided into a malignant pleural effusion group, an infective pleural effusion group, and a transudation group.Then the infective group was further divided into subgroups of tuberculosis pleural effusion group andparapneumonic effusion group. The concentration of tumor M2-PK in pleural fluid obtained during the first thoracocentesis was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay( ELISA) . Results The concentration of tumor M2-PK was significantly higher in the malignant pleural effusion group compared with the benignpleural effusion groups ( P lt; 0. 01) . Significant differences were also found in the concentration of tumor M2-PK between malignant pleural effusion caused by lung cancer and metastatic lung cancer( P lt; 0. 05) .When the cutoff value of tumor M2-PK was set at 18. 68 U/mL, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion was 87. 6% , 86. 0% , and 87. 4%, respectively. Furthermore,the detection of tumor M2-PK in combination with CEA showed better diagnostic sensitivity( 96. 0% ) ,specificity ( 85. 0% ) , and accuracy ( 91. 1% ) . Conclusions The detection of tumor M2-PK in pleural effusion is of some clinical significance in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pleural effusion.The detection of tumor M2-PK in combination with CEA is a good diagnostic tool with high sensitivity andspecificity.
目的:探讨胸膜活检对胸腔积液病因诊断的价值。方法:对127例胸腔积液患者行首次胸膜活检术。结果:127例患者获取胸膜组织125例, 穿刺成功率98.4%,经病理检查有41例为正常胸膜组织,特异性病理诊断84例,病理诊断阳性率(67.2%)。恶性胸腔积液胸膜活检阳性38例(45.2%),结核性胸腔积液胸膜活检阳性31例(36.9%),非特异性炎15例(17.9%)。38例恶性肿瘤经免疫组织化学和特殊染色分类,腺癌27例,小细胞肺癌2例,鳞癌2例,恶性间皮瘤2例,转移癌3例,淋巴瘤1例,未分化癌1例。发生并发症者4例(3.1%),全部为气胸,肺压缩均小于15%,未做特殊处理数日后自行吸收。结论:胸膜活检是一项安全、简单、有效的胸膜疾病的重要的内科确诊手段。
目的:探讨胸膜活检对胸腔积液病因诊断的价值。方法:对268例胸腔积液患者行经胸壁胸膜活检术。结果:268例患者共行胸膜活检289次,二次及以上活检者19例,获取胸膜组织244例,穿刺成功率91%,经病理检查有18例为正常胸膜组织,阳性诊断者为226例,阳性率92.6%(226/244),其病理诊断为结核104例(46%)、肿瘤54例(23.9%)、慢性炎症68例(30.1%);发生并发症者19(6.6%),全部为气胸,肺压缩均小于30%,未做特殊处理数日后自行吸收。结论:从本组资料可以看出,经胸壁胸膜活检术对于胸腔积液的病因诊断具有非常好的效果,相比胸水涂片或病理检查具有更高的阳性率。因此经胸壁胸膜活检术由于它的简单、安全、高效等特点,目前在胸腔积液病因诊断方面仍是一项重要的手段。