目的探讨保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术(PPPD)的手术适应证、捆绑式胰肠吻合术的特点及胃排空障碍的治疗。方法12例均行PPPD，消化道重建按Child法，胰肠吻合均采用捆绑式胰肠吻合。结果除1例术后第21天并发切口裂开、肺栓塞死亡外，其余11例均顺利出院，平均住院时间24 d，随访1年，1例术后8个月死亡，余均健在。结论PPPD是治疗胰头癌及壶腹周围癌的一种具有广阔应用前景的术式，捆绑式胰肠吻合有望作为胰肠吻合的标准术式。
Objective To summarize the experiences in diagnosis and treatment for iatrogenic injury of cholodocho-pancreatico-duodenal junction （CPDJ）. Method The clinical data of 9 patients with CPDJ injury were analyzed retro-spectively. Results Double lumen tube drainage was emplaced in all the operations. Nutrition support and inhibitor ofpancreatic secretion were applied in all the patients. ①CPDJ injuries were observed intraoperatively for 6 out of 9 patientswith CPDJ injury. Two patients with simple perforation of posterior wall of common bile duct inferior segment and 2patients with simple duodenal perforation who were treated by perforation repair， common bile duct T tube drainage， andperitoneal drainage. Two cases of bile duct or duodenal injury with pancreatic injury were treated by choledochojejunostomyand BillrothⅡgastrojejunostomy. These 6 patients with CPDJ injury were cured and none of case was death. ②Injuries of CPDJ were observed postoperatively for 3 out of 9 patients with CPDJ injury. Total bile diversion or total bile diversion with duodenal diverticulum were performed in 2 cases of bile duct or duodenal injury with pancreatic injury， respectively. The one with total bile diversion only was died of abdominal infection， duodenal fistula， wound dehiscence， abdominal and upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding， and multiple organ failure；the one with total bile diversion with duodenal diverticulum and the one with sequent PTCD and choledochojejunostomy for biliary obstruction caused by operation ofgigantic duodenal interstitialoma were cured. Conclusions CPDJ injury usually occurs in biliary duct exploration， endoscopic sphincterectomy or duodenal operation. It is easily misdiagnosed and serious consequences may happen from this. Timely and correct treatment should be taken according to the specific injury observed during or after the operation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified triple-layer(MTL) duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and with resection of jejunal serosa, analyse the risk factors of pancreatic fistula, and compare effects with two-layer(TL) duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. MethodsData on 184 consecutive patients who underwent the two methods of pancreaticojejunostomy during standard PD between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2013 were collected retrospectively. The risk factors of pancreatic fistula were investigated by using univariate and multivariate analyses. ResultsA total of 88 patients received TL and 96 underwent MTL. Rate of pancreatic fistula for the entire cohort was 8.2%(15/184). There were 11 fistulas(12.5%) in the TL group and four fistulas(4.2%) in the MTL group(P=0.039). Body mass index, pancreatic texture, pancreatic duct diameter, and methods of pancreaticojejunostomy had significant effects on the formation of pancreatic fistula on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm and TL were the significant risk factors of pancreatic fistula. ConclusionsMTL technique effectively reduced the pancreatic fistula rate after PD in comparison with TL, especially in patients with pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreatico-jejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsSystematically literature search was performed through PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and CNKI from the earliest to November 30, 2015. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing outcomes of Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancrea-ticojejunostomy and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy were searched. The data were applied meta-analysis by RevMan 5.3. ResultsSeven trials were involved, two RCTs including 367 patients and five CCTs including 431 patients. Meta-analysis result showed that there was no statistic significant difference in pancreas fistula between Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreaticojejunostomy and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy. ConclusionRoux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy is not superior to conventional pancreaticojejunostomy regarding pancreatic fistula rate or other relevant outcomes.
Objective To investigate the effect of the position of pancreatic duct in pancreatic section on postoperative pancreatic fistula. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy admitted to the pancreatic surgery department of our hospital from September 2018 to August 2020 were retrospectively collected. The consistency between intraoperative pancreatic section data and preoperative CT cross-sectional images of pancreatic duct was compared, and the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model analysis, to determine whether the position of pancreatic duct on pancreatic section during pancreaticojejunostomy had an impact on the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Results A total of 373 patients were included in this study. In 44 cases, the ratio of the thickness of the short distance from the center of the pancreatic duct to the edge of the pancreas at the pancreatic section was 0.41±0.09, and the imaging measurement value was 0.40±0.10. The interclass correlation coefficient detection value of the two measurement methods was 0.916 (>0.75), P<0.001, this had high consistency. Patients had a high BMI [OR=1.276, 95%CI (1.154, 1.411), P<0.000 1] and soft pancreatic texture [OR=2.771, 95%CI (1.558, 4.927), P=0.001] were independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula, while the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula decreased with the increased proportion of pancreatic duct thickness from center to edge [OR=0.875, 95%CI (0.840, 0.911), P<0.000 1]. Conclusions Patients with high BMI and soft pancreas are independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula, and the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula is reduced when the center of pancreatic duct is far from the edge of pancreas. The ratio of short distance from the center of pancreatic duct to the edge of pancreas to the total thickness of pancreas measured by preoperative imaging can be used to evaluate the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
目的 探讨捆绑式胰肠吻合术在预防胰十二指肠切除术后胰肠吻合口漏的可行性及临床应用价值。 方法 我院在2002年3月至2006年10月期间对32例胰十二指肠切除术患者采用捆绑式胰肠吻合术。结果 32例患者手术均顺利，无一例发生胰瘘，无手术死亡病例。 术后发生胆瘘2例，经腹腔引流治愈。结论 捆绑式胰肠吻合术操作简便，预防胰瘘效果可靠，值得推广。
Objective To investigate the historical evolution and the research progress of pancreaticoenterostomy method in the pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods The related literatures of PubMed， EMBASE， Wanfang， CNKI， and VIP databases were retrieved and reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of various pancreaticojejunostomy type in pancreaticoduodenectomy were summarized. Results The type of pancreaticoenterostomy is the major influence factors for the pancreaticoduodenectomy success or failure and the patients’s recovery. Conclusion According to the specific cases， the type of pancreaticojejunostomy in skilled operation is the key to success.
Objective To investigate the effect of the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in invaginating end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy. Methods A retrospective review was conducted for 200 patients treated with pancreaticoduod-enectomy （PD） between August 2005 and December 2012. Reconstruction of digestive tract in PD was done according to the method described by Child. The duct-to-mucosa anastomosis was applied in the invaginating end-to-side pancrea-ticojejunostomy. The outline of the anastomosis structures was as follows：anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa， anastomosis of pancreatic and jejunal resection margin， and anastomosis of pancreas and jejunal seromuscular layer. A cilicone tube was put into the pancreatic duct and lead to the jejunum. The anastomotic stoma was covered with part of the omentum majus, and put a drainage tube under the anastomotic stoma. Results The operation went smoothly，and no deaths occurred during perioperative period. The surgical time was 280-420 min， the average time was （298±77） min. The pancreatic fistula were observed in 22 patients （11%）， including 17 patients in Grade A， 2 patients in Grade B， and 3 patients in Grade C. The other complications were observed in 19 patients， including 16 patients with addominal infection， 1 patient with bleeding from splenic vein， 1 patient with bleeding from ruptured of pseudoaneurysm at biliary intestinal anastomosis， 1 patient with abdominal abscess. Three patients with pancreatic fistula in Grade C were cured by reoperation, and the other patients with pancreatic fistula were cured by expectant treatment. Conclusions The duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in invaginating end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy is a simple and safe procedure that has the advantage in reducing the incidence of the pancreatic fistula. Using omentum to cover the anastomotic could localize the diffusion of panreactic fistula， and reduce the incidence of serious complications caused by pancreatic fistula.
Objective To compare anastomotic fistula of modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods The clinical data of 147 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2015 to June 2017 in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively analyzed. The modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 101 cases (MTL group) and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 46 cases (IPJ group). The differences of intraoperative and postoperative statuses were compared between the two groups. Results The baseline data of these two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05). Except for the average time of the pancreaticoenterostomy of the MTL group was significantly longer than that of the IPJ group (P<0.05), the intraoperative blood loss, the first postoperative exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization time, reoperation rate, death rate, and rates of complications such as the pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, anastomotic bleeding, gastric emptying disorder, and intraperitoneal infection had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Both modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy are safe and effective. An individualized selection should be adopted according to specific situation of patient.