Objective To investigate feasibility and clinical efficacy of exploration and stone removal through choledochoscope via hepatic cross-section during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. Methods The patients who had left extrahepatic bile duct stones with choledocholithiasis from January 2012 to December 2016 were retrospectively collected. Among these patients, 29 cases underwent an exploration and stone removal through choledochoscope via hepatic cross-section during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy (observation group) and 26 cases underwent an exploration and stone removal through choledochoscope via incision of common bile duct during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy (control group). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative nutritional, and complications rate were compared between these two groups. Results The operations were performed successfully and no perioperative death happened in both groups. There were no significant differences in the operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). Moreover, the postoperative hospital stay of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in the complications of the bile leakage, subphrenic infection, and biliary residual stones between the two groups (P>0.05). Also, the levels of prealbumin and the lymphocytes in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group on the 3rd and 6th day after the operation (P<0.05). Conclusions Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that exploration and removal of stones through choledochoscope via hepatic cross-section during laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis is relatively safe and reliable, its procedure is simplified, could avoid relevant complications due to biliary incision and T tube drainage.
Objective To study the etiology of primary intrahepatic stones. MethodsThe literatures in the recent years on the etiology of intrahepatic stone were revieved. Results The formation of intrahepatic stone mainly caused by bacteria infection, parasitic infestation, bile stasis, congenital anatomic abnormalities and immunoreaction of bile tract. Further investigation found that metabolic, low protein diet, environment and ethnic factors and gene mutation were considered to play important roles in the formation of the intrahepatic stone. Conclusion The formation of intrahepatic stone is complex and are result of multiple factors. It closely related to the infection and stasis of the bile duct.
Objective To evaluate effectiveness and safety of electronic choledochoscopy in treatment of intrahepatic bile duct stones. Methods From July 2013 to February 2016, 280 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones in the Department of General Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences were selected as the research objects. All the patients were randomly divided into a choledochoscopy treatment group and a conventional treatment group by envelope principle method. There were 140 patients in each group. The safety and short- and long-term effectiveness were compared in these two groups. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital. Results ① The age, gender, body mass index, course of disease, and location of stone had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). ② The operations and the net stones were successfully completed in all the patients. The operative time was shorter, the blood loss was less, the incision length was smaller, the postoperative anal exhaust time was earlier, and the hospitalization time was shorter in the choledochoscopy treatment group as compared with the conventional treatment group (P<0.05). ③ The total postoperative complication rate on day 14 in the choledochoscopy treatment group was 2.9% (4/140), which was significantly lower than that in the conventional treatment group (11.4%, 16/140, P<0.05). ④ The curative excellent and good rates was 97.9% and 85.0% in the choledochoscopy treatment group and conventional treatment group respectively, which was a significant difference in these two groups (P<0.05). ⑤ The postoperative serum ALT and AST values on month 6 in the choledochoscopy treatment group were significantly lower than those in the conventional treatment group (P<0.05). Conclusion Electronic choledochoscopy in treatment of intrahepatic bile duct stones could promote rehabilitation of patient, reduce incidence of postoperative complications, and it is conducive to promoting recovery of liver function and improving follow-up effect.
目的 了解肝部分切除治疗肝内胆管结石的效果。方法回顾性分析1984年3月至1997年8月对95例肝内胆管结石施行肝部分切除，并辅以狭窄胆管切开整形及胆肠吻合等手术的治疗情况。结果 临床疗效优良者达93.7%，术后残留结石10例，残石率为10.5%。结论 肝部分切除治疗肝内胆管结石是目前较理想有效的手术方式。
目的探讨肝内胆管结石合并肝胆管癌的临床诊断和治疗经验。 方法回顾性分析我院手术治疗28例肝内胆管结石合并肝胆管癌的病例资料。结果本组28例占同期肝内胆管结石病例的6.7%。术前各类影像学检查发现癌灶17例，5例获细胞学检查确诊。术中7例经快速组织活检证实。另4例系术后确诊。肿瘤多为腺癌，位于肝门胆管18例，肝内胆管9例，肝内、肝门部广泛浸润1例。根治性肿瘤切除8例，获随访6例，平均生存23个月； 姑息性肿瘤切除8例，获随访6例，平均生存11个月； 仅行外引流者7例，其中3例于术后2周内死亡，3例术后9个月内死亡，1例生存4个月后失访。结论长期肝内胆管结石刺激及继发感染是肝胆管癌发生的重要因素。联合应用影像学检查结合病理活检获得早期诊断和选择合理的根治性肝切除术是提高疗效的有效措施。
Objective To explore the indications for liver transplantation among patients with hepatolithiasis. Methods Data from 1431 consecutive patients with hepatolithiasis who underwent surgical treatment from January 2000 to December 2006 were retrospectively collected for analysis. Surgical procedures included T-tube insertion combined with intraoperative cholangioscopic removal of intrahepatic stones, hepatectomy, cholangiojejunostomy, and liver transplantation. Results Nine hundred and sixty-one patients who had a stone located in the left or right intrahepatic duct underwent hepatectomy or T-tube insertion combined with intraoperative cholangioscopic removal of intrahepatic stones. The rate of residual stones was 7.5% (72/961). Four hundred and seventy patients who had a stone located in the bilateral intrahepatic ducts underwent surgical procedures other than liver transplantation; the rate of residual stones was 21.7% (102/470). Only 15 patients with hepatolithiasis underwent liver transplantation; they all survived. According to the degree of biliary cirrhosis, recipients were divided into 2 groups: a group with biliary decompensated cirrhosis (n=7), or group with biliary compensated cirrhosis or noncirrhosis group (n=8). There were significant differences in operative times, transfusion volumes and blood losses between 2 groups (P＜0.05). In the first group, 6 of 7 patients experienced surgical complications, and in the second, 8 recipients recovered smoothly with no complications. Health status, disability and psychological wellness of all recipients (n=15) were significantly improved in 1 year after transplantation as compared with pretransplantation (P＜0.05). Conclusion Liver transplantation is a possible method to address hepatolithiasis and secondary decompensated biliary cirrhosis or difficult to remove, diffusely distributed intrahepatic duct stones unavailable by hepatectomy, cholangiojejunostomy, and choledochoscopy.
Objective To summarize contents of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and understand it’s status and prospect in application of patients with hepatolithiasis. Methods The descriptions of ERAS in recent years and applications in hepatolithiasis were reviewed. Results The ERAS programme mainly included the preoperative managements, such as the education, nutrition management, and gastrointestinal tract management; the intraoperative managements, such as the minimally invasive surgery, reasonable choice of anesthesia, infusion volume management, and maintenance of body temperature, analgesia, and preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting medication selection; the postoperative early feeding, early exercise, early extubation, multimodal analgesia, T tube management, reasonable discharge standard and follow-up management. Although the ERAS was rarely reported in patients with hepatolithiasis, it had some advantages of promoting recovery and improving patient satisfaction, and it was still effective and safe. Conclusions Application of ERAS concept in patients with hepatolithiasis has achieved precision management and individualized treatment during perioperative period. It could achieve a good short-term therapeutic effect and optimize medical management model. However, there are still some problems at the present stage in implementation and promotion of patients with hepatolithiasis, such as lacks of criteria and specifications, evidence-based medicine. It is needed to further strengthen communication and collaboration among multiple disciplinary teams so as to further improve ERAS programme and popularize it.