【摘要】 目的 探讨经鼻胃镜在食管狭窄扩张和支架置入术中的作用。 方法 2007年10月-2009年3月对28例癌性食管狭窄以及并发食管-气管瘘的患者行PENTAX（EG-1580K）超细经鼻电子胃镜检查，计算插入深度，并进行扩张和支架治疗，在胃镜直视下调节输送器内支架上端的位置，观察扩张效果、支架放置成功率、定位的准确性以及并发症情况。 结果 全部患者均行扩张治疗，效果良好，支架一次性放置全部成功，定位准确，自膨满意，最狭窄处的内径由（4.8±1.2）mm扩至（12.5±1.5）mm，食管气管瘘被覆盖治疗效果好，患者的吞咽困难评级由3.25±0.58降至0.94±0.59。 结论 在食管狭窄扩张和支架置入术中应用经鼻超细胃镜患者依从性好，方法简便，安全有效。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the role of nasal endoscopy in the esophagostenosis expansion and esophageal stent. Methods PENTAX (EG-1580K) ultrafine nasal endoscopy was used in 28 patients (October 2007-March 2009) with esophageal cancer complicated with esophagostenosis and fistula to check the e-calculated insertion depth, stent expansion and the average diameter expansion. The endoscopy was carried under the direct vision with the location of the top bracket in order to ensure the accurate stent placement, all without X-ray assist. The success rates of stent placement, positioning accuracy, as well as complications were evaluated. Results The expansion treatments were successful in all patients with one-off operation. The narrowest part increased from (4.9±1.6) mm to (12.7±1.5) mm, and the esophageal fistula was covered. The rating of dysphagia decreased from 3.15±0.68 to 0.91±0.49. Conclusion Nasal endoscopy is simple, safe and effective in the treatment of ultrafine expansion for esophagostenosis and stent implantation with good compliance.
ObjectiveTo collect the data of esophageal foreign body patients, and to evaluate the clinical effects of two different surgical methods in our hospital.MethodsThe clinical data of 294 patients who were treated in Gansu Provincal Hospital from January 2012 to June 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical data were collected and analyzed by SPSS 22.0. In order to to evaluate the efficacy of flexible esophagoscope (FE) and rigid esophagoscope (RE) in the treatment of esophageal foreign bodies.The patients were divided into two groups: a RE group including 118 patients with 62 males and 56 females at age of 6 (3-37) years and a FE group including 176 patients with 84 males and 92 females at age of 6 (3-59) years.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, age stratification, gender and foreign body type between the two groups. There was a statistical difference in the initial clinical symptoms (P=0.041) or in esophageal foreign bodies position (P=0.037) between the two groups. The success rate of foreign body removal was similar between the two groups (P=0.632). The success rate was 88.9% (105/118) in the RE group, 87.5% (154/176) in the FE group. The operation time was significantly longer in the RE group than that in the FE group (10.8 ±17.4 min vs. 17.5±21.6 min, P<0.001). The postoperative hospitalization time in the RE groups was longer than that in the FE group (21.5 ±24.2 hours vs. 12.5 ±21.3 hours, P<0.05). There was a statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P=0.034). In the RE group, the main complication was mucosal edema (15.3%). And the rate of bleeding was higher (15.9%) in the FE group. There were 30 patients (25.5%) in the RE group with minor postoperative complications versus the FE group with 40 patients (22.7%); and 1 patient (0.8%) in the RE group with severe complications versus the FE group with 5 paients (2.8%).ConclusionBased on the analysis of this study, it is found that RE has higher safety. But the indications are strict, the professional requirements of the operator and the selection of patients are stronger. The FE is convenient to use, the operation crowd is wide, and the suitable crowd is wide. Therefore, for specific patients, after improving the relevant examination and preoperative evaluation of patients, clinicians need to choose appropriate surgical methods to ensure the success of the operation, and reduce the postoperative complications as far as possible.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of lidocaine mucilage diluent and simethicone emulsion in gastroscopy examination, in order to provide effective drugs for gastroscopy. MethodsWe selected 201 outpatients and the inpatients who underwent gastroscopic examination between August and October 2014 as the research subjects. Based on the kind of drug, the patients were randomly divided into research group (n=100) and control group (n=101). Patients in the research group accepted lidocaine mucilage diluent, while those in the control group received simethicone emulsion. Then we observed and compared the definition of gastroscopy, adverse drug reactions, examination time and drug price between the two groups. ResultsThe frequencies of high, medium, and low definition of gastroscopy were respectively 63.00%, 34.00% and 3.00% among the patients in the research group, and 69.31%, 26.73% and 3.96% among patients in the control group; there was no significant differences between the two groups (Z=-0.854, P=0.393). The adverse reaction rates, testing time, and drug prices for the two groups were 0.99% vs.1.00% (P>0.05), (6.5±2.1) minutes vs.(6.6±2.0) minutes (t=0.458, P>0.05), and RMB (9.0±1.2) yuan vs.(42.8±2.8) yuan (t=227.644, P<0.05), respectively. ConclusionLidocaine mucilage diluent and simethicone emulsion both have good effect for gastroscopic examination, which can raise the gastroscopic definition, promote endoscopic operation and observation by doctors, shorten examination time, and reduce adverse drug reactions. Both are of great value in clinical application, and lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage diluent is cheaper, which can be widely used and promoted clinically.
Objective To summarize the research progress of magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE) in application for gastric diseases. Method By searching the literatures in domestic and foreign database, the latest literatures on the application of MCCE for gastric diseases were reviewed. Results Compared with traditional gastroscopy, the diagnostic accuracy of MCCE was comparable to that of traditional gastroscopy, and there was no serious complications had been reported in use of MCCE. In addition, MCCE had advantages of comfort, safety, and prevention of cross-infection. However, it could not be used for biopsy and treatment. With the constant technical innovation, application of MCCE would be more extensive in future. Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of MCCE in gastric diseases is high. Compared with traditional gastroscopy, it has more advantages. The shortcomings of MCCE can be improved with the development of science and technology, and it can be used for the initial screening of gastric diseases.
目的 观察帕瑞昔布钠与舒芬太尼用于无痛胃镜麻醉的安全性和有效性及对患者满意度的影响，为提高临床无痛胃镜麻醉的安全性和舒适性提供依据。 方法 采取前瞻性随机双盲对照方法，纳入2011年8月－12月拟行无痛胃镜检查的患者120例，随机分为3组。患者于胃镜检查开始前口服利多卡因胶浆，静脉注射舒芬太尼、帕瑞昔布钠或生理盐水10 mL。检查时静脉注射异丙酚。记录患者检查过程中生命体征、异丙酚使用量、诱导时间、检查时间、苏醒时间、医师以及患者满意度、舒适度等数据。 结果 舒芬太尼组检查中各时间点平均动脉压明显低于帕瑞昔布组（P=0.029），血管活性药物用量明显高于帕瑞昔布组（P=0.036）。医师以及患者满意度舒芬太尼组和帕瑞昔布组相当，且均高于对照组（P＜0.05）。除呛咳外，帕瑞昔布组其他不良反应的发生率明显低于舒芬太尼组（P＜0.05）。 结论 实施无痛胃镜检查前15 min静脉注射帕瑞昔布钠0.6 mg/kg或舒芬太尼0.10 μg/kg均可以获得满意的麻醉效果，麻醉医师和患者及家属的满意度明显增高，且帕瑞昔布对呼吸和循环的影响更小，安全性更高。
目的:观察比较胃镜下硬化剂注射联合药物治疗和单纯硬化剂注射治疗、药物治疗食管静脉曲张出血的疗效。方法:95例肝硬化并食管静脉曲张出血患者,分成三组。32例患者给予硬化剂注射联合药物治疗,31例患者给予硬化剂治疗,32例患者给予药物治疗。观察三组患者急诊止血率,近期出血率、远期再出血率、曲张静脉消失率、曲张静脉复发率。 结果: 联合组、硬化剂组、药物组急诊止血率分别为93.8%.90.3%、68.8%;联合组、硬化剂组、药物组近期出血率分别为6.3%、9.7%、46.9%;联合组、硬化剂组、药物组曲张静脉消失率分别为90.6%、83.9%、1.9%;联合组、硬化组与药物组急诊止血率、近期出血率、曲张静脉消失率有显著差异。联合组、硬化剂组、药物组远期出血率分别为9.4%、59.4%、31.3%; 联合组、硬化剂组、药物组曲张静脉复发率分别为18.8%、45.2%、87.5%;联合组与硬化组、药物组远期出血率、曲张静脉复发率有显著差异。结论:胃镜下硬化剂注射联合药物治疗食管静脉曲张出血可显著提高疗效。