ObjectiveTo understand the obstacles in the practice of pulmonary rehabilitation between doctors and patients.MethodsMedical staff and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in public hospitals in this region were randomly sampled, and a questionnaire survey was conducted on possible obstacles to the practice of pulmonary rehabilitation.ResultsTotal of 265 medical staff and 120 COPD patients were recruited in this survey. The obstacles of pulmonary rehabilitation practice of medical staff in clinical work are poor cooperation of patients and their families (84.2%), medical staff’s insufficient awareness of pulmonary rehabilitation (82.3%), and lack of practice and guidelines (78.9%), lack of objective conditions such as site, equipment and equipment (75.1%), lack of multidisciplinary teams (74.3%), pulmonary rehabilitation has fallen by the wayside (73.6%) etc. The main obstacles for COPD patients in pulmonary rehabilitation are lack of access to relevant knowledge (52.4%), insufficient knowledge (36.5%), inconvenient transportation, economic problems and other objective conditions (33.3%). After multiple correspondence analysis, there are differences in the degree of correlation between obstacle factors and groups with different characteristics.ConclusionsThere are many factors hindering the development of pulmonary rehabilitation and there are certain differences among different populations, but the lack of understanding of pulmonary rehabilitation between doctors and patients is the primary problem. It is necessary to improve the cognition of both doctors and patients on pulmonary rehabilitation, and then to solve the obstacles in the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation.
Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the traditional outpatient and medical center pulmonary rehabilitation models for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been limited, while pulmonary rehabilitation technology has always been the focus of clinical and scientific research in rehabilitation. This article reviews the application status of remote pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease under the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic in recent years. From the selection and method of remote pulmonary rehabilitation equipment before the epidemic, to the development of rehabilitation forms and equipment innovation after the epidemic, the current status and problems of remote pulmonary rehabilitation are clarified. Establishing a remote pulmonary rehabilitation model in line with China’s national conditions is the direction and goal of future development.
ObjectiveTo observe the curative effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with stable moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).MethodsSixty-four patients with stable moderate to severe COPD who visited during January 2016 and December 2017 were recruited in the study. They were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 32 cases in each group. The spirometry was conducted in all patients. The right deep inspiratory end diaphragm thickness and the quiet end expiratory diaphragm thickness were measured by ultrasound, and the diaphragm thickness fraction (DTF) was calculated. The routine drug treatment was given in both groups. The comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation treatment was given in the observation group (include breath training, exercise training, health education and nutrition guide). The pulmonary function, diaphragm function, severity and quality of life were evaluated before and 6 months later after the treatment.ResultsIn the observation group, the predicted value of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%pred), FEV1/FVC ratio and DTF were all significantly improved compare with before treatment and the control group (all P<0.05). While the BODE index was significantly declined compare with before treatment and the control group (all P<0.05).ConclusionPulmonary rehabilitation treatment can help improve pulmonary function, diaphragm function, condition of the disease and quality of life.
ObjectiveTo clarify the effectiveness of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PPR) and provide evidence for the application of PPR on lung cancer patients by meta-analysis.MethodsAccording to inclusion and exclusion criteria, literatures related to PPR on lung cancer patients were retrieved from major databases between the date of establishment of each database and January 2019, and then data required were extracted from the selected literatures. Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.0.ResultsTwelve randomized controlled trials were involved in meta-analysis, including 658 patients who were well-diagnosed and prepared for surgery, with 307 patients in the PPR group and 351 patients in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that in the PPR group, the pulmonary function including forced vital capacity [MD=0.31, 95%CI (0.21, 0.42), P<0.01], forced expiratory volume in one second [MD=0.27, 95%CI (0.20, 0.34), P<0.01] and activity tolerance including 6-minute walk distance [MD=50.55, 95%CI (35.98, 65.13), P<0.01] were significantly better than the control group, and the postoperative complication rate was lower ［MD=0.28, 95%CI (0.18, 0.43), P<0.01］, postoperative hospital stay was shorter [MD=–2.09, 95%CI (–2.41, –1.77), P<0.01].ConclusionsA period of PPR on lung cancer patients can improve postoperative pulmonary function and activity tolerance, and reduce postoperative complications and hospital stay, which is beneficial to postoperative recovery.
Objective To examine the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation training on pulmonary function in patients post-stroke. Methods We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, ProQuest, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database, and VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database for randomized controlled trials of investigating the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation training on pulmonary function in stroke patients published before September 2018. The patients in the training group were treated with pulmonary rehabilitation, including respiratory muscle training, chest breathing, or abdominal breathing training, with or without respiratory training device. The patients in the control group received conventional stroke rehabilitation. The outcome indicators included forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1 percentage predicted (FEV1%pred), peak expiratory flow rate, maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), maximal expiratory pressure, exercise endurance, and quality of life. Two researchers independently carried out literature retrieval and data extraction, using Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale, and standard data extraction forms adapted from Cochrane Collaboration model to evaluate the studies quality. The Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5.3. Results Eleven studies met the study criteria with a total of 500 stroke patients, including 274 patients in the training group and 226 patients in the control group, respectively. The Meta-analysis showed that after pulmonary rehabilitation training, the values of FVC [mean difference (MD)=0.30 L, 95% confidence interval (CI)(0.26, 0.34) L, P<0.000 01], FEV1 [MD=0.28 L, 95%CI (0.25, 0.32) L, P<0.000 01], and 6-minute walking test [MD=43.43 m, 95%CI (7.92, 78.95) m, P=0.02] in the training group were significantly higher than those in the control group, as well as the change of PImax [MD=6.49 cm H2O (1 cm H2O=0.098 kPa), 95%CI (3.67, 9.32) cm H2O, P<0.000 1]. The advantages of pulmonary rehabilitation training had not been found in improving FEV1/FVC and FEV1%pred (P>0.05). Conclusions The implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation training in the way of respiratory muscle training combined with conventional rehabilitation therapy could improve two kinds of indicators of pulmonary function referring to FVC and FEV1, inspiratory muscle strength and 6-minute waking distance. The long-term effect of pulmonary rehabilitation training on stroke patients, the respiratory training mode of different prescriptions, the endurance of exercise and the quality of life need further study.
Objective To investigate the effects of mask BiPAP noninvasive positive ventilation (NIPPV) during treadmill exercise on dyspnea index and exercise endurance in stable patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Twenty inpatients with stable severe COPD between August 2015 and January 2016 were recruited in the study. The following parameters were measured before and after 8-week rehabilitation by NIPPV during treadmill exercises, including 12-minute walking distance (12MWD), Borg dyspnea score, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), PaO 2 and PaCO 2, times of acute exacerbation in 1 year, adverse reactions, and adherence. Results After rehabilitation for 8 weeks, the following parameters were improved than those before treatment including 12MWD [(810±20) mvs. (680±15) m,P<0.01], Borg dyspnea score (2.4±0.1vs. 4.4±0.3,P<0.01), mPAP [(34.4±2.7) mm Hgvs. (43.5±3.8) mm Hg], PaCO 2 [(49.8±4.9) mm Hgvs. (64.3±5.2) mm Hg], PaO 2 [(64.4±4.1) mm Hgvs. (52.3±3.9) mm Hg] and the times of acute exacerbation (2.1±0.7vs. 4.3±2.1,P<0.01). Adverse reactions included oropharyngeal drying (2 cases) and gaseous distention (8 cases) which can be tolerated without special treatment. Conclusion Mask NIPPV during treadmill exercise is safe and effective for stable patients with severe COPD and worthy of clinical application.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of lung ultrasound-guided pulmonary rehabilitation training in ICU patients on mechanical ventilation.MethodsPatients on mechanical ventilation admitted to the ICU of a tertiary A-level hospital in Hefei city from July 2022 to December 2023 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group using a random number table method. The control group received conventional pulmonary rehabilitation training, while the experimental group underwent lung ultrasound-guided pulmonary rehabilitation training. The differences in lung ultrasound scores, oxygenation index, diaphragm function, weaning success rate, and mechanical ventilation time were compared between the two groups on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th days of intervention.ResultsThe study was completed with 48 cases in the experimental group and 46 cases in the control group. Repeated measures ANOVA showed statistically significant intergroup effects, time effects, and interaction effects on lung ultrasound scores, oxygenation index, diaphragm mobility, and diaphragm thickness variability rate (P<0.05). The weaning success rate was higher in the experimental group than in the control group, and the mechanical ventilation time was shorter, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).ConclusionsThe lung ultrasound-guided pulmonary rehabilitation training program can effectively improve the pulmonary status, oxygenation, and diaphragm function of ICU patients on mechanical ventilation, increase the success rate of weaning, shorten the mechanical ventilation time, and accelerate patient recovery.
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the impact of shortterm preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on the exercise capacity of lung cancer patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease（COPD）. Methods Between March 2009 and August 2010, 30 lung cancer patients with moderate or severe COPD were treated with preoperative comprehensive PR for two weeks in Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital. The sample was comprised of 18 males and 12 females with an average age of 62.5±7.7 years. Twelve of the patients had moderate COPD, while 18 had severe COPD. We collected information on the length of postoperative hospital stay for each patient,as well as any pulmonary complications. Results (1) The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced expiratory volume in one second % (FEV1%), forced expiratory volume in/ forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC),and maximal ventilatory volume (MVV) (1.30±0.30 L, 59.19±18.00 L, 47.74±1200 L, 56.63±13.00 L) values after PR were slightly better than those before PR(1.24±0.40 L, 51.89±14.00 L, 46.59±10.00 L, 49.67±13.00 L), but not significantly so(Pgt;0.05). The results for carbon monoxide diffusion capacity were similar. (2) The sixminute walking distance (before: 502.67±157.00 m, after: 594.87±116.00 m), peak expiratory flow (before: 209.33±66.00 L/min, after: 255.33±70.00 L/min), dyspnea index (Borg index) (before: 0.26±0.20, after: 0.12±0.10), and fatigue index (before:0.24±0.20, after: 0.12±0.10) all improved significantly aftercomprehensive PR (Plt;0.05). (3) All 30 patients underwent surgery, and none died during the perioperative period. Eight patients experienced cardiopulmonary complications. The average hospitalization time after surgery was 8.0±2.4 days. Conclusion Preoperative comprehensive PR appears to significantly improve exercise capacity and reduce the rate of postoperative lung complications in lung cancer, patients with lower cardiopulmonary function.