Objective To investigate the effect of mesenteric lymphatic duct liagtion and glutamine enteral nutrition on intestine and distant organs in intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Methods Forty male SD rats undergoing gastrostomy were randomly assigned into 5 groups (n=8): sham operation group, normal enteral nutrition group, normal enteral nutrition+lymphatic duct ligation group, glutamine group and glutamine+lymphatic duct ligation group. Sham operation group only received laparotomy after 7 days of full diet, the other four groups were subjected to 60 min of intestinal ischemia after 7 days of enteral nutrition, and the two lymphatic duct ligation groups were plus mesenteric lymphatic duct ligation. The original nutrition continued 3 days after reperfusion. Intestinal permeability was detected on day 1 before reperfusion, day 1 and 3 after reperfusion. Intestinal morphology was observed, endotoxin, D-lactate and diamine oxidase levels in serum, and apoptotic index in lung tissue were detected on day 3 after reperfusion. Results The intestinal permeability in each group was significantly increased on day 1 after reperfusion (Plt;0.05), and which in normal enteral nutrition+lymphatic duct ligation group and glutamine+lymphatic duct ligation group were significantly decreased on day 3 after reperfusion (Plt;0.05). The mucosal thickness and villus height of ileum and mucosal thickness of jejunium in glutamine+lymphatic duct ligation group were significantly higher than those in other groups (Plt;0.05), and villus height of ileum in glutamine group was higher than that in normal enteral nutrition group (Plt;0.05); those morphology indexes in normal enteral nutrition+lymphatic duct ligation group were higher than those in normal enteral nutrition group, but there was no statistical signification (Pgt;0.05). Apoptosis index of lung tissue in lymphatic duct ligation groups was significant lower than that in no-ligation groups (Plt;0.05). Levels of endotoxin, D-lactate, and diamine oxidase in lymphatic duct ligation groups had downward trends compared with no-ligation groups, but there was no statistical signification (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions Intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury of rats can cause intestinal permeability increase, bacterial endotoxin translocation and systemic inflammatory response. Mesenteric lymphatic duct ligation and glutamine enteral nutrition intervention can weak lung tissue damage, increase thickness of intestinal mucosa, maintain intestinal barrier function, reduce endotoxin translocation and attenuate systemic inflammatory response. Enteral nutrition with glutamine was better than normal enteral nutrition.
Objective To study effects of enteral immunonutrition and econutrition on intestinal mucosa barrier function in wounded rats. Methods Forty Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups, with ten rats in each group 〔ie.control group, enteral nutrition (EN) group, enteral immunonutrition (EIN) group and enteral econutrition (EEN) group〕. After gastrostomy, rats in each group were treated with the isocaloric and isonitrogenous nutritional formulas for 7 days, respectively. The morphology of ileum membrane was studied, and the quantities of IgA+, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells (each HP) of ileum membrane were determined. Results The villus height, crypt depth, mucosal thickness (except EN group) and villus surface area of ileum were increased in EN, EIN and EEN group compared with control group (P＜0.05), but there was no significant difference among the former three groups (Pgt;0.05). The numbers of IgA+, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells were increased in EN, EIN and EEN group compared with control group (P＜0.05), and those numbers in EN group were lower than those in EIN and EEN group (P＜0.05). Conclusion EIN and EEN may improve intestine mechanical barrier function and promote restoration of small intestine mucous membrane barrier function in rats. EIN and EEN also improve intestine immune barrier function and strengthen its immune function.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of early enteral nutrition (EEN) on immune status of patients in intenseive care unit (ICU). MethodsA prospective control study was conducted from July 2011 to December 2012, and 80 patients after trauma and surgery were admitted to ICU. The Patients were divided into EEN group and normal enteral nutrition (NEN) group randomly. Enteral nutrition in EEN group began within 24 hours after admitted to ICU, while within 48 hours in NEN group. ResultsIn 80 patients, 78(37 in EEN group and 41 in NEN group) completed the end point. The baseline in two groups was consistent (P>0.05). The indicators of lymphocyte, IgA, IgG, IgM and CD4+, CD8+, natural kill cell and pre-albumin values in EEN group were higher than those in NEN group (P<0.05). The incidence of diarrhea (8.1%, 26.8%) and infection of wound (2.7%, 17.1%) in EEN were less than those in NEN group. The hospitalization duration in ICU in EEN group[(7.94±3.72) days] was also shorter than that in NEN group[(10.62±3.14) days]. ConclusionEarly enteral nutrition improves immune function and nutrition status in ICU patients; it also protects gut barrier function and reduces the ICU hospitalization duration.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo generally analyze the current situations of clinical research and applications in early enteral nutrition (EEN) after abdominal surgery. MethodsThe published papers about the current situations of clinical research and applications in EEN after abdominal surgery were reviewed. ResultsEEN after abdominal surgery seems to be safe and effective, produces a positive nitrogen balance, keeps the integrality of structure and function of the apparatus, protects gut barrier, and reduces or prevents septic complications. ConclusionEEN may be of more benefits and will be one of the best methods of nutrition support after abdominal surgery.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the predictors of enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients. MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases were searched to collect relevant observational studies from the inception to 6 August, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 18 studies were included, including 28 847 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that gender, age, severity of illness, hypo-albuminemia, length of stay, postpyloric feeding, mechanical ventilation and mechanical ventilation time, use of prokinetics, use of sedation drugs, use of vasoactive drugs and use of antibiotics were predictors of enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients, among which postpyloric feeding (OR=0.46, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.71, P<0.01) was a protective factor. ConclusionAccording to the influencing factors, the medical staff can formulate a targeted enteral nutrition program at the time of admission to the ICU to reduce the occurrence of feeding intolerance. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with preoperative oral nutrition supplement (EnsourceTM) in patients with rectal cancer and its effect on postoperative stress response.MethodsFrom January 2018 to August 2018, 80 patients with laparoscopic assisted radical resection of rectal cancer in our hospital were divided into two groups according to different perioperative management. Forty patients who had used enhanced recovery after surgery combine preoperative application of tumor total nutrition formula enteral nutrition solution were as observation group, while other 40 patients who only had used enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative as control group. We observed the stress response (mean systolic blood pressure, mean diastolic blood pressure, mean heart rate, mean blood oxygen saturation, pain score and fasting blood glucose) at 24 hours after surgery and the time of the first anal exhaust, complication rate, hospitalization time, and hospitalization cost after surgery in both groups. We also compared the early postoperative (on the second day after operation) nutritional status of the two groups like the levels of serum total protein, albumin and proalbumin.ResultsThe mean systolic blood pressure, mean diastolic blood pressure, mean heart rate, mean blood oxygen saturation, pain score and fasting blood glucose of the observation group at 24 hours after surgery were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05), while the total serum protein, albumin and prealbumin concentrations of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group on the second day after surgery (P<0.05). Postoperative hospitalization time and hospitalization cost in the observation group were also shorter or less than those in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the first postoperative anal exhaust time was earlier and the incidence of postoperative complications was reduced in the observation group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).ConclusionsERAS combined with preoperative application of tumor total nutrition formula enteral nutrition fluid (EnsourceTM) can reduce the postoperative stress response and the postoperative complication rate of patients with rectal cancer, and also improve the postoperative nutrition status of patients and promote the rapid recovery of patients after sugery.
Objective To study the current clinical application and advancement of microbioecological preparation. Methods Literatures about microbioecological preparation published in China and abroad were collected and reviewed. Results The microbioecological preparation has been widely used at present. It is used to rebuild a balanced microbial population in human body, particularly in intestinal, to promote the stability of internal environment, control dysbacteriosis and to treat a variety of gastrointestinal diseases associated with ectopic microbial population. Conclusion Although microbioecological preparation has been widely used in clinical settings, its effect yet should be further supported and evaluated both by large sample research in randomized double-blind control trails and evidence-based medicine.
ObjectiveTo summary the effect of parenteral nutrition combined with enteral nutrition on patients with severe acute pancreatitis. MethodsThe clinical data of 200 patients with severe acute pancreatitis admitted in our hospital in recent 10 years were retrospectively analyzed. Of which 88 cases were treated by traditional nutritional support therapy (traditional nutrition group), the rest of 112 cases of patients with early parenteral nutrition to later period gradually combined with enteral nutrition comprehensive nutritional support strategy (comprehensive nutrition group). ResultsThe APACHEⅡscores and serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP) of patients in comprehensive nutrition group were significantly lower than patients in traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05), while the serum albumin level was significantly higher than that of traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05). In the incidence of complications and mortality, the average length of stay and total cost of comprehensive nutrition group were significantly lower than patients with traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05), the cure rate was significantly higher than that of traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe combination of parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition of nutrition support model not only can shorten the duration of symptoms but also alleviate the burden of patients and reduce complications and mortality.
ObjectiveTo explore influence of different nutritional approaches on liver function in patients after esophagectomy. MethodsA total of 160 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgical treatment were divided into a enteral nutrition (EN) group and a total parenteral nutrition (TPN) group according to different medical staff. There were 80 patients in each group. Two and 7 days postoperatively, albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin (TB) of the 2 groups were examined to evaluate liver function. ResultsAbnormities in liver function (ALB, PA, ALT, TB) was common phenomenon in esophageal cancer patients, but there was no statistical difference in ALB, PA, ALT, TB on the 2nd postoperative day between the EN group and the TPN group (P > 0.05). On the 7th postoperative day, liver functions were improved than those on the 2nd postoperative day in the two groups. And frequencies of liver function abnormity in the EN group were significantly lower than those in the TNP group (P < 0.05). ConclusionCompared with TPN, EN has advantages in facilitating hepatic protein synthesis and recovery of liver function after esophagectomy.