west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "肋骨骨折" 33 results
  • 聚左旋乳酸可吸收肋骨钉治疗重症肋骨骨折患者的适应证探讨

    摘要: 目的 探讨聚左旋乳酸可吸收肋骨钉治疗重症肋骨骨折患者的适应证,总结其应用经验。 方法 2005年6月至2008年8月,我科对46例(男31例,女15例;年龄15~61岁,平均年龄38岁)合并多根多段肋骨骨折、连枷胸、大出血和胸内外复合伤患者行开胸手术治疗,根据骨折特点分类,用聚左旋乳酸可吸收肋骨钉固定骨折肋骨,同时处理相应的胸内外复合伤。 结果 围术期死亡1例,术后第3 d死于突发腹腔大出血。44例患者术后胸壁稳定,自主呼吸,排痰良好。随访45例,随访时间6个月~3年,随访期间有39例胸壁稳定,胸部X线片示:固定处无透明带,对位愈合良好;有4例患者出现可耐受的胸痛;7例患者有13处固定后肋骨移位,分别出现在gt;3 cm劈裂或斜形骨折、老年皮质较薄、多发性肋软骨骨折和双侧肋骨骨折患者中。 结论 断面相对较整齐有移位的横形骨折、3cm以内较短的劈裂或斜形骨折、合并线性胸骨骨折是采用可吸收肋骨钉固定骨折肋骨首选的适应证;对粉碎性骨折和gt;3 cm较长的劈裂斜形骨折,不宜采用;软骨部、老年骨皮质较薄骨折应慎重选用。

    Release date:2016-08-30 06:02 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparison between Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Conventional Surgery for Multiple Rib Fractures

    ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcomes between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and conventional surgery for the treatment of multiple rib fractures. MethodsA total of 173 consecutive patients with multiple rib fractures were admitted to Dujiangyan People's Hospital from January 2010 to December 2012. There were 122 males and 51 females with their age of 19-71 (41.3±7.1) years. According to different treatment strategies, all the patients were divided into 3 groups:conservative treatment group (83 patients with a mean of 4.9±1.3 fractured ribs, including 20 patients with flail chest), conventional surgery group (41 patients with a mean of 5.2±1.1 fractured ribs, including 11 patients with flail chest) and VATS group (49 patients with a mean of 5.3±1.5 fractured ribs, including 14 patients with flail chest). Length of hospital stay, duration of postoperative pain, incision length, operation time, chest drainage duration and morbidity were compared among the 3 groups. ResultsThe incision length (5.2±1.5 cm vs. 8.5±2.3 cm, P=0.031), operation time (1.1±0.3 hours vs. 1.8±0.2 hours, P=0.003), chest drainage duration (0.3±0.0 day vs. 3.2±1.1 days, P=0.007) and length of hospital stay (13.7±1.5 days vs. 17.3±2.3 days, P=0.017) of VATS group were significantly shorter than those of the conventional surgery group. A total of 159 patients were followed up, and chest x-ray was examined at 1, 3 and 6 months after discharge. After 3 months, bone callus formation was evident around the rib fractures in chest x-ray in patients undergoing surgery, while bone union with deformity was shown in some patients of the conservative group. ConclusionWith the development of various internal fixation materials, surgical internal fixation has become a trend for patients with multiple rib fractures, and VATS internal fixation is minimally invasive with satisfactory clinical outcomes.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 创伤性肋骨骨折的处理:广东胸外科行业共识(2017 年版)

    Release date:2018-05-02 02:38 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Choice of Surgical Pathway and Incision for Multiple Fractured Ribs

    目的探讨多发性肋骨骨折切口及手术入路选择 方法回顾性分析赤峰学院附属医院2000年6至2013年12月手术治疗58例多发性肋骨骨折患者的临床资料,其中开胸组46例,胸腔镜组12例,男43例、女15例,年龄36(15~61)岁。 结果开胸手术组平均手术时间152 min,平均住院时间16 d;腔镜镜手术组平均手术时间125 min,平均住院时间12.5 d。46例开胸手术患者中44例术后胸壁稳定,自主呼吸排痰良好,16例肺挫伤较重有呼吸综合征(ARDS)倾向,术后经12~148 h呼吸机支持后恢复,1例死于合并食管下段破裂,术后第3 d突发腹腔大出血,分析为外伤性腹主动脉瘤破裂。3例患者切口部分裂开,均为环抱器骨板,1例胸骨骨折胸大肌皮瓣拉拢缝合治愈,另2例中1例取出裸露骨板,1例换药及二期缝合治愈。45例患者返院及电话随访6个月至3年,开胸组39例胸壁稳定,胸部X线片固定处均有骨伽形成,全组无难以耐受的肋间神经痛,腔镜手术组切口及固定肋骨处愈合良好。 结论实际操作中可根据骨折形态特点以后外侧“~”切口及垂直切口为基础做多种变形。胸腔镜下手术切口设计时要根据骨折断端位置,可能出现的胸内脏器血管损伤,综合考虑切口布局;最好操作孔及进镜孔处有骨折断端,方便内外结合固定,节省手术时间;同时要考虑出血脏器损伤的部位,方便止血修补或中转开胸;操作孔可以3~5个。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 负压封闭引流技术治疗多发肋骨骨折内固定术后切口感染所致复杂创面一例

    Release date:2016-10-28 02:02 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Using Spiral CT Three Dimensional Reconstruction in Chest Injury after Stereotactic Multiple Rib Fractures Treated by Internal Fixation with Small Incision

    目的探讨多发性肋骨骨折合理治疗方法。 方法回顾性分析山东省日照市岚山区人民医院心胸外科2010年1月至2013年10月115例胸部闭合性损伤患者的临床资料,其中男81例、女34例,年龄19~75岁,平均36.2岁。 结果CT三维重建能够准确判断肋骨骨折情况及胸廓变形情况,然后设置小切口选择性手术内固定肋骨骨折,患者经过手术治疗后全部痊愈,无死亡病例,患者术后疼痛明显减轻,胸廓形状基本恢复,呼吸功能及咳嗽功能基本恢复,住ICU时间8~72(10± 2)h,住院时间9~21(12± 1)d。随访6~18个月,随访率88.7%(102/115);患者对手术治疗效果满意度为95.1%(97/102)。 结论多发性肋骨骨折患者利用螺旋CT三维重建立体定位后采用小切口手术内固定治疗是一种安全且符合微创原则的治疗方法。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 电视胸腔镜联合形状记忆环抱接骨板治疗多发性肋骨骨折

    目的探讨应用电视胸腔镜联合形状记忆环抱接骨板治疗多发性肋骨骨折的方法和疗效。方法自 2009年 1~ 12月上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院(崇明)胸心外科收治 38例多发性肋骨骨折患者(内固定组),均行电视胸腔镜探查、止血、胸腔内血凝块清除、肺裂伤修补,应用电视胸腔镜定位肋骨骨折部位,切开复位,并采用形状记忆环抱接骨板行肋骨内固定。选择 2008年 1 ~ 12月我科收治的 44例胸部创伤经保守治疗的患者作为对照(非内固定组)。术后观察两组患者的胸痛缓解时间、坐起时间、下床时间、住院时间、胸壁畸形、骨折愈合时间及相关并发症(肺不张、肺部感染)发生情况。结果内固定组患者均临床愈合,治愈率为 100%。平均手术时间 48.2 min,术后胸痛明显缓解,平均 2.5 d可坐起, 6.8 d可站立行走,平均住院时间为 10.2 d,原有的胸壁畸形均矫正、平均骨折愈合时间为 4周,无明显并发症发生。内固定组患者的胸痛缓解时间、坐起时间、下床时间、住院时间、胸壁畸形、骨折愈合时间及相关并发症(肺不张、肺部感染)发生率均短于或少于非内固定组( P< 0.05)。内固定组随访 38例,随访时间 2~ 14周,均复查胸部 X线片,未见明显并发症发生,无再次骨折,接骨板无松动、断裂。结论应用电视胸腔镜联合形状记忆环抱接骨板治疗多发性肋骨骨折具有创伤小、操作简便、固定可靠、组织相容性好及并发症少等优点,有利于促进骨折愈合和呼吸功能改善,是治疗多发性肋骨骨折较理想的方法。

    Release date:2016-08-30 05:49 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Fast Track Surgery in Rib Fracture Fixation

    ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of fast track surgery (FTS) in rib fracture fixation. MethodsFifty-two patients with chest trauma who underwent rib fracture fixation surgery in Mingji Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from October 2010 to June 2013 were enrolled in this study. All the patients were divided into FTS group and control group. In the FTS group, there were 26 patients including 22 males and 4 females with their age of 45.62±8.20 years, who received FTS strategies. In the control group, there were 26 patients including 21 males and 5 females with their age of 46.42±7.60 years, who received traditional treatment strategies. Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), gastrointestinal function recovery time, postoperative hospital stay and hospitalization cost were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsVAS at 6 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively of FTS group (4.5±0.3, 4.2±0.2, 3.2±0.1) were significantly lower than those of the control group (6.5±0.1, 6.1±0.3, 4.8±0.2) respectively (P < 0.05). Gastrointestinal function recovery time of FTS group (0.8±0.2 days) was significantly shorter than that of the control group (1.5±0.5 days, P < 0.05). Length of hospital stay (21.0±2.6 days) and hospitalization cost (5.18±0.75 ten thousand yuan) of FTS group were significantly shorter or lower than those of the control group (26.2±3.4 days and 5.78±0.64 ten thousand yuan) respectively (P < 0.05). ConclusionFTS strategies can effectively reduce postoperative VAS, shorten length of hospital stay, decrease hospitalization cost, and promote postoperative recovery of rib fracture patients.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 胸部外伤手术107例临床分析

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Performed titanium locking plate versus nickel-titanium memory alloy embracing fixator in the treatment of multiple rib fractures

    Objective To compare clinical outcomes between the performed titanium locking plate and nickel-titanium memory alloy embracing fixator for the treatment of multiple rib fractures, and to select a better internal fixator for multiple rib fractures. Methods A total of 206 consecutive patients with multiple rib fractures were admitted to Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery in Beijing Luhe Hospital of Capital Medical University from October 2011 to September 2016. According to different treatment strategies, the patients were divided into 2 groups: a performed titanium locking plate group (a titanium plate group, n=105) and a nickel-titanium memory alloy embracing fixator group (an embracing fixator group, n=101). There were 82 males and 23 females with a mean age of 46.5±9.7 years ranging from 23 to 65 years in the titanium plate group, and 83 males and 18 females with a mean age of 44.7±10.3 years ranging from 19 to 63 years in the embracing fixator group. The preoperative data, curative outcomes, visual analogue scale (VAS) and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in the preoperative data between the two groups, and all patients successfully completed the operation. Compared with the embracing fixator group, the incision length and operation time were shorter, intraoperative bleeding and VAS score were less, and curative outcome was better in the titanium plate group. Conclusion The performed titanium locking plate has a great advantage in the clinic, which can be preferred.

    Release date:2018-05-02 02:38 Export PDF Favorites Scan
4 pages Previous 1 2 3 4 Next

Format

Content