ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of steroids combined with antiepileptic drugs compared with alone antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of children with epileptic electrical status during sleep to provide evidence-based medical basis for its treatment.MethodsElectronic searches were maded in PubMed, Embase database, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang and the Chinese biomedical literature database for the literature about steroids combined with antiepileptic drugs compared with alone antiepileptic drugs in the treatment, and retrieval time is from January 1990 to October 2020. Two evaluators independently screened literature, extracted data, evaluated literature quality and risk of bias and checked each other. Meta analysis was performed by stata16.0 software.ResultsA total of 679 children with ESES were included in 10 studies, including 9 randomized controlled trials and 1 retrospective cohort study. Meta analysis results showed that there were statistically significant differences in clinical improvement rate [RR=1.31, 95%CI (1.21, 1.42), P<0.01], electroencephalogram discharge improvement rate [RR=1.35, 95%CI (1.25, 1.46), P<0.01] and cognitive intelligence score [SMD=1.19, 95%CI (0.80, 1.57), P<0.01] between steroids combined with antiepileptic drugs group and alone antiepileptic drugs group after 6 months follow-up. The incidence of adverse reactions in steroids combined with antiepileptic drugs group was higher than that in alone antiepileptic drugs group, and the difference was statistically significant [RR=4.13, 95%CI (1.06, 16.13), P<0.01]. All adverse reactions improved or disappeared after drug withdrawal.ConclusionCompared with alone antiepileptic drugs, steroids combined with antiepileptic drugs group has advantages in controlling epileptic seizures, improving electroencephalogram abnormalities and improving cognitive ability, and it is relatively safe.
Objective To investigate the effects of exogenous bone morphogenetic protein(BMP) and transforming growth factor-β(TGF-β) on biomechanical property for ulna of fracture healing.Methods Thirty-six adult rabbits were made the model of right ulnar fracture and treated locally with TGF-β/PLA, BMP/PLA，TGF-β+BMP/PLA or PLA(as control group). Fracture healing was evaluated by measurement of the mechanical parameters and geometric parameters.Results As compared with control group, the geometric parameters, the bending broken load, the ultimatebending strength, the bending elastic modulus, the ultimate flexural strength, the flexural elastic modulus, the ultimate compressing strength, the compressingelastic modulus, and the ultimate tensile strength for ulna of fracture healingincreased significantly in the treatment groups(P＜0.01). These parameters were higher in TGF-β+BMP/PLA group than in TGF-β/PLA group or in BMP/PLA group andin TGF-β/PLA group than in BMP/PLA group(P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in bone density between the treatment groups and control group. Conclusion Local application of exogenous TGF-β and BMP canincrease the callus formation and enhance biomechanical strength of bone after fracture healing. A combination of TGF-β and BMP has synergetic effect in enhancing fracture healing.
Both bariatric surgery and pharmacotherapy, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), are effective interventions for obesity, yet each has its own advantages and limitations. Drawing on the “bridging” concept from cancer therapy, this commentary explores an innovative obesity management strategy that involves the combined application of GLP-1RA and bariatric surgery during the perioperative period, with the aim of optimizing treatment outcomes. The present analysis focuses specifically on the potential value of this approach: preoperatively, GLP-1RAs serve as a “bridging therapy” to promote weight loss and reduce surgical risks in severely obese patients; postoperatively, they might be used to manage weight rebound or insufficient weight loss. This multimodal integrated strategy is designed to overcome the inherent limitations of single therapies and offer patients more comprehensive treatment options. Emphasizing that future research must urgently focus on optimizing treatment parameters (e.g., timing, dosage), evaluating long-term safety and efficacy, and establishing patient selection criteria for combination therapy. Integrating surgical and pharmacological treatments, this comprehensive strategy based on the oncological “bridging” concept represents a highly promising paradigm shift in obesity management.
ObjectiveTo develop a score system to predict the probability of failure of monotherapy in epilepsy patients with initial treatment, and then provide pillars for early use of polytherapy.MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 189 patients with epilepsy treated in Department of Neurology, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2019 to July 2020. Patients were divided into monotherapy acceptable group and monotherapy poor effect group according to their drug treatment plan and drug efficacy. The influencing factors were screened out by single factor analysis and binary logistic regression analysis. And on the basis of this β value, a quantitative scoring table for predicting the unsatisfying treatment effect of monotherapy is developed. And the receiver operating curve (ROC curve) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the scale.ResultsBased on a standard of 75% reduction in seizures during the observation period, 138 cases (73%) were effective with monotherapy plan, while 51 cases (23%) were unsatisfactory. Regression analysis showed that multiple forms of seizures, status epilepticus (t2), brain damage, and the number of seizures ≥ 7 times before treatment are independent risk factors for poor outcome of monotherapy. The resulting score sheet has a total score of 12 points; the area under the ROC curve is 0.779, and the critical score is 6 points (sensitivity: 0.314; specificity: 0.957). Patients with more than this score have a strong probability of poor response in monotherapy.ConclusionThis prediction model can effectively assess the risk of unsatisfactory therapeutic effect of monotherapy in epilepsy patients who are initially treated, and thus has reference function for the early selection of polytherapy.
Valproic acid can reduce the frequency of seizures through various mechanisms and is widely used in clinical practice as a monotherapy or adjunctive treatment for various types of epilepsy and epileptic syndromes. In addition, valproic acid has significant therapeutic effects on comorbidities associated with epilepsy, such as migraines and psychiatric disorders. It can also be effective in terminating status epilepticus and is commonly used as a broad-spectrum antieseizure medication in clinical settings. However, valproic acid has side effects such as teratogenicity, infertility, and menstrual disorders. Additionally, when used in combination with other drugs, the interactions between medications should be carefully considered. Therefore, in clinical practice, it is necessary to strictly adhere to the indications and dosage regimens for the use of valproic acid. This article provides a comprehensive review of the use of valproic acid in different types of seizures, epileptic syndromes, comorbidities associated with epilepsy, post-craniotomy cases, status epilepticus, and special populations. It also summarizes the combination therapy of valproic acid with other drugs, providing a basis for the rational use of valproic acid and individualized drug treatment selection for epilepsy patients.
目的 比较拉米夫定+阿德福韦酯联合治疗与阿德福韦酯单药治疗对阿德福韦酯停药后出现病毒学反弹而无基因型耐药变异患者的疗效及安全性。 方法 回顾研究2007年1月－2012年1月在传染科门诊就诊的67例阿德福韦酯治疗获得病毒学应答但停药后出现病毒学反弹的e抗原阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者，分别给予拉米夫定+阿德福韦酯联合治疗（联合组，n=35）和阿德福韦酯单药治疗（单药组，n=32）。 结果 治疗1年后，联合组（32例，85.7%）较单药组（21例，65.6%）有更多的患者重新获得了丙氨酸转氨酶复常（P=0.009），联合组34例（97.1%）乙型肝炎病毒DNA阴转，单药组22例（68.8%）阴转，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.002）；在血清学转换方面，联合组和单药组分别有4例（11.4%）和1例（3.1%）患者获得了e抗原的血清学转换。在治疗中所有患者均未发生任何严重不良反应。 结论 阿德福韦酯停药后出现病毒学反弹，选择拉米夫定与阿德福韦酯联合治疗可使患者重新获得较好的生化学和病毒学应答。
Objective To summarize the effect of lenvatinib + transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) + programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with main portal vein tumor thrombus and cavernous transformation. Methods In this study, we reported the clinical data of four patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with main portal vein tumor thrombus and cavernous transformation who received conversion therapy with lenvatinib combined with TACE and PD-1 antibody in West China Hospital. Results Among the four patients, two patients achieved complete response and two achieved partial response; tumor markers were significantly decreased after combination treatment. However, all four patients failed to undergo hepatectomy. ConclusionsLenvatinib + TACE + PD-1 antibody is effective for hepatocellular carcinoma with main portal vein tumor thrombus and cavernous transformation. However, there are still many problems worthy of further discussion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy, safety, and problems of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and their combination with other therapies in treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodThe relevant literatures on the clinical trials of ICIs and their combination therapy in patients with advanced HCC in recent years were collected and reviewed.ResultsThe therapeutic effects of programmed death receptor 1 and its ligands and cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 monoclonal antibodies in clinical trials of patients with advanced HCC were better, but the therapeutic effect of single drug was limited. Double immunotherapy and its combination with anti-angiogenesis inhibitors, molecular targeted drugs, and local therapy might make patients achieve more remarkable therapeutic effects, especially in combination with anti-angiogenesis inhibitors.ConclusionICIs could remarkably improve survival prognosis of patients with advanced HCC, combined immunotherapy has better survival benefits.
Objective To investigate the effect of emergency fast-track treatment on dangerous upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods Seventy-six patients who received traditional treatment between October 2020 and March 2021 were included in the traditional treatment group, and 82 patients who entered the emergency fast track for dangerous upper gastrointestinal bleeding between April 2021 and September 2021 were included in the fast-track treatment group. The patients in the traditional treatment group were treated with the traditional single-subject diagnosis and treatment mode, and the patients in the fast-track treatment group were treated according to the multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment procedures of emergency fast track for dangerous upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The length of emergency stay, 24-hour endoscopic completion rate, effective rate, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results The length of emergency stay [(3.75±3.19) vs. (6.51±4.72) h], the effective rate (96.3% vs. 85.5%) and the length of hospital stay [(8.26±2.51) vs. (11.07±2.79) d] were significantly better in the fast-track group than those in the traditional treatment group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the 24-hour endoscopic completion rate between the two groups (96.3% vs. 96.1%, P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional treatment mode, the fast-track treatment mode can significantly improve the treatment efficiency, and reduce the lengths of emergency stay and hospital stay.
Main iliac artery disease is a common lesion that leads to arteriosclerosis and occlusion of the lower limbs. Effective treatment of complex main iliac artery disease has always been a difficult problem. The author’s team successfully treated a patient with long segment iliac artery occlusive disease from the left common iliac artery to the opening of the left femoral artery (118 mm) with Gore viabahn VBX balloon dilated intravascular covered stent and viabahn covered stent, and be reported.