Objective To evaluate the systematic reviews of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for insomnia, to provide supporting evidence for clinical practice. Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Elsevier Science Direct, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, Wanfang and Chongqing VIP were searched from databases establishment to May 30, 2022, to find systematic reviews on the treatment of insomnia with rTMS as the main method. The methodological quality, reporting quality and evidence quality of outcome indicators were evaluated by AMSTAR 2, PRISMA 2020 and GRADE. Results A total of 4 systematic reviews published between 2018 and 2021 were included. Further analysis showed that one of the systematic reviews had a low AMSTAR 2 quality rating and the remaining systematic reviews were very low. The average PRISMA 2020 score of these 4 systematic reviews was (20.75±3.27) points, of which 3 systematic reviews had some defects in their reports, and the other one had relatively complete reports. The GRADE evidence quality assessment showed that there were 40 outcome indicators in the included literature, of which 3 outcome indicators (sleep quality, the percentage of S2 sleep in total sleep time, and S3 sleep in percentage of total sleep time) were rated as moderate, 17 were rated as low and 20 were rated as very low. Conclusions The treatment of insomnia by rTMS has achieved certain effects in clinical practice, but the systematic review of rTMS as the main intervention measure for insomnia needs to further improve the quality and standardize related research. The clinical application of rTMS for insomnia should be treated as appropriate.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a noninvasive neuromodulation technique can improve the impairment of learning and memory caused by diseases, and the regulation of learning and memory depends on synaptic plasticity. TMS can affect plasticity of brain synaptic. This paper reviews the effects of TMS on synaptic plasticity from two aspects of structural and functional plasticity, and further reveals the mechanism of TMS from synaptic vesicles, neurotransmitters, synaptic associated proteins, brain derived neurotrophic factor and related pathways. Finally, it is found that TMS could affect neuronal morphology, glutamate receptor and neurotransmitter, and regulate the expression of synaptic associated proteins through the expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor, thus affecting the learning and memory function. This paper reviews the effects of TMS on learning, memory and plasticity of brain synaptic, which provides a reference for the study of the mechanism of TMS.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of different stimulation modalities of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with SSRI in improving depressed mood after stroke using network meta-analysis. MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the objectives from inception to October 1, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using R 4.2.1software. ResultsA total of 25 RCTs involving 2 152 patients were included. Four types of rTMS stimulation combined with SSRIs were included: high-frequency stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal (l-DLPFC), low-frequency stimulation of l-DLPFC, low-frequency stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal (r-DLPFC), and low-frequency stimulation of the bilateral DLPFC. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that the effect of combining four stimulation methods with SSRI in treating depression was better than that of SSRI alone (P<0.05). Probability sorting results showed that low-frequency stimulated bilateral DLPFC (88.9%) > low-frequency stimulated l-DLPFC (63.1%) > high-frequency stimulation l-DLPFC (57.1%) > low-frequency stimulation r-DLPFC (40.4%). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the four stimulation methods combined with SSRI and the use of SSRI alone (P>0.05). Conclusion rTMS combined with SSRIs is better than SSRIs alone in improving depressed mood after stroke. Low-frequency rTMS stimulation of bilateral DLPFC may be the best. Meanwhile, the safety of different stimulation methods is good.
In the treatment of drug-refractory epilepsy in children, surgical treatment has a good clinical effect. However, for children whose surgical site is difficult to determine and who cannot undergo resectional surgery, neuromodulation techniques are one of the treatments that can be considered. At present, new neuromodulation technologies in children mainly include transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, ta-VNS), deep brain stimulation (deep brain stimulation, DBS), reactive nerve stimulation (responsive neurostimulation, RNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (transcranial direct current stimulation, TDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (transcranial alternating current stimulation, TACS). This article briefly discussed the clinical efficacy and safety of various currently available neuromodulation technologies, so as to provide a reference for the rational selection and application of neuromodulation technologies, and improve the clinical efficacy and quality of life of children with drug-refractory epilepsy.
The therapeutic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are closely related to the structure of the stimulation coil. Based on this, this study designed an A-word coil and proposed a multi-strategy fusion multi-objective slime mould algorithm (MSSMA) aimed at optimizing the stimulation depth, focality, and intensity of the coil. MSSMA significantly improved the convergence and distribution of the algorithm by integrating a dual-elite guiding mechanism, a hyperbolic tangent control strategy, and a hybrid polynomial mutation strategy. Furthermore, compared with other stimulation coils, the novel coil optimized by the MSSMA demonstrates superior performance in terms of stimulation depth. To verify the optimization effects, a magnetic field measurement system was established, and a comparison of the measurement data with simulation data confirmed that the proposed algorithm could effectively optimize coil performance. In summary, this study provides a new approach for deep TMS, and the proposed algorithm holds significant reference value for multi-objective engineering optimization problems.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a widely used neuroregulatory technique, has been proven to be effective in treating neurological and psychiatric disorders. The therapeutic effect is closely related to the intracranial electric field caused by TMS, thus accurate measurement of the intracranial electric field generated by TMS is of great significance. However, direct intracranial measurement in human brain faces various technical, safety, ethical and other limitations. Therefore, we have constructed a brain phantom that can simulate the electrical conductivity and anatomical structure of the real brain, in order to replace the clinical trial to achieve intracranial electric field measurement. We selected and prepared suitable conductive materials based on the electrical conductivity of various layers of the real brain tissue, and performed image segmentation, three-dimensional reconstruction and three-dimensional printing processes on each layer of tissue based on magnetic resonance images. The production of each layer of tissue in the brain phantom was completed, and each layer of tissue was combined to form a complete brain phantom. The induced electric field generated by the TMS coil applied to the brain phantom was measured to further verify the conductivity of the brain phantom. Our study provides an effective experimental tool for studying the distribution of intracranial electric fields caused by TMS.
Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disease that mostly occurs in middle-aged and elderly people. It is characterized by progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and aggregation of Lewy bodies, resulting in a series of motor symptoms and non-motor symptoms. Depression is the most important manifestation of non-motor symptoms, which seriously affects the quality of life of patients. Clinicians often use antidepressant drugs to improve the depressive symptoms of patients with Parkinson 's disease, but it is still urgent to solve the problems of drug side effects and drug resistance caused by such methods. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a safe and non-invasive neuromodulation technique that can change the excitability of the corticospinal tract, induce the release of dopamine and other neurotransmitters, and further improve the depressive symptoms of patients with Parkinson 's disease. Based on this, this paper discusses and summarizes the research progress on the efficacy and potential mechanism of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving depression in Parkinson 's disease at home and abroad, in order to provide reference for related clinical application research.
Non-invasive brain stimulation is a technology that uses magnetic field or electric field to act on the brain to adjust the activity of cerebral cortex neurons. It mainly includes transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. The principle is to accelerate the induction of neuroplasticity by changing the excitability of the cerebral cortex. The characteristics are noninvasive, safe and that the patient can tolerate it. This article mainly introduces the theoretical foundation and mechanisms of non-invasive brain stimulation, and its application and safety in stroke complications, neuropathic pain and epilepsy, and discusses the commonly used treatment regimens of non-invasive brain stimulation in different neurological diseases, in order to provide possible treatment reference for the rehabilitation of neurological diseases.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on stroke patients with aphasia. MethodsDatabases such as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2014), CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data were searched up to June 2014, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about rTMS for stroke patients with aphasia. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the exclusion and inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 9 RCTs involving 130 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group, rTMS improved stoke patients' speech function after treatment (WMD=14.36, 95%CI 6.93 to 21.79, P=0.000 2). The results of descriptive analysis showed that, rTMS at Broadmann area 45 (1 Hz, 90% RMT, once 20 or 30 minutes, 2 or 3 weeks as a course with 2-day intervals) possibly had a positive long-term effect on post-stroke patients' speech function. ConclusionrTMS may positively improve stroke patients' speech function. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more large-scale, multicenter, high quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.