Forty cases of intertrochanteric fractures of femur were treated with percutaneous nonmetallic external fixator. The patients were followed up for 6 months to 3 years, and the fractures were all united without coxa vara or shirtening deformities. There was no mortality in this series. This method had the advantages ofbeing simple, save time and effort, less traumatic and early ambulation. The design of the apparatus tallied with the biomechanics of the neck and shaft of the femur.
Objective To investigate the appl ication of anti-rotation screw after dynamic hi p screw (DHS) in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture. Methods Between April 2006 and January 2010, 22 cases of intertrochanteric fractures underwent DHS fixation operation with an anti-rotation screw, including 15 males and 7 females with an average ageof 66.3 years (range, 54-83 years). Fractures were caused by sl ipping in 16 cases, traffic accident in 5 cases, and fall ing from height in 1 case. All cases showed closed fractures, including 13 cases in the left and 9 cases in the right. Eighteen cases were simple intertrochanteric fracture, 4 cases were intertrochanteric fractures compl icated with Colles fractures. According to Evans classification standard, there were 14 cases of type I, 6 cases of type II, 1 case of type III, and 1 case of type IV. The time from wound to operation was 3-7 days (mean, 4.5 days). Results The operation time ranged from 51-95 minutes (mean, 72 minutes). The intraoperative blood loss was 150-350 mL (mean, 270 mL). The hospital ization days were 12-35 days (mean, 16.8 days). Primary heal ing was observed in all cases. All cases were followed up 6-17 months (mean, 14 months). Union of fracture was observed at 12-16 weeks (mean, 13.6 weeks); no fracture or internal fixation loosening occurred. According to HUANG Gongyi’s standard of efficacy assessment, the results were excellent in 19 cases and good in 3 cases. Conclusion Appl ication of an anti-rotation screw can help to improve the strength of the DHS for the internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture, especially the anti-rotation abil ity, which does not increase the operation time obviously.
Objective To evaluate the primary cl inical effect of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNAR) in treating femoral intertrochanteric fractures, to summarize operation skills and to analyze correlated curative effective influentialfactors. Methods From July 2006 to May 2007, 19 cases of intertrochanteric fractures (including 8 males, 11 females, aged45-87 years old) were treated with closed reduction and PFNAR fixation. Fractures were caused by fall ing. The locations were left sides in 10 cases and right sides in 9 cases. According to AO classification, there were 14 cases of type A2 and 5 cases of type A3. Operative time, volume of blood loss and weight bear time were analyzed, the condition of fracture union was observed and the hip function was evaluated using Harris criterion after 9 months of follow-up. Results Operative time ranged 23-78 minutes with an average time of 47 minutes, the volume of blood loss ranged 50-120 mL with an average volume of 85 mL, getting-outof- bed time ranged 2-14 days with an average time of 7.4 days; the weight bearing time ranged 10-14 weeks with an average time of 12.4 weeks. No intra-operative femoral fractures and no regional or deep infection occurred during hospital ization period. Seventeen cases were followed up from 3 months to 12 months with an average time of 9.4 months, and achieved bone heal ing within 15-18 weeks with an average time of 16.5 weeks. No compl ications such as delay heal ing, coxa vara or coxa valga, cut-out and screw extraction occurred. Fifteen cases were followed up over 9 months; according to the Harris criterion for evaluation, the results were excellent in 13 cases, good in 1 case and fair in 1 case, the excellent and good rate was 93.3%. Conclusion PFNAR has the advantages of micro invasion, easy-to-perform, less blood loss, less bone loss and stable fixation in treatment of unstable comminuted intertrochanteric fracture, especially in old patients with osteoporosis.
【摘要】 目的 探讨多功能外固定支架治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效和优点。 方法 2007年7月-2009年10月，采用外固定架治疗28例老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者，其中男11例，女17例；年龄74~91岁，平均81岁。致伤原因:摔伤25例，交通事故伤3例。骨折按Evans分型:Ⅰ型1例，Ⅲ型15例，Ⅳ型12例。受伤至手术时间2~7 d。 结果 术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合，无延迟愈合及其他早期并发症发生。28例均获随访，随访时间5~14个月，平均9个月。X线片示骨折全部愈合，愈合时间11～24周，平均17周。无髋内翻和下肢短缩等并发症发生。术后3个月，采用Harris评分进行功能评价，优18例，良7例，差3例，优良率89.3%。出现轻度针道感染7例，中度5例，重度2例，针道感染率50%；合并糖尿病者2例出现中度针道感染，2例出现重度针道感染。重度者经局部换药、应用抗生素后愈合，后又反复出现，2~3个月取钉后愈合。无骨感染发生，患者均未出现褥疮，合并症无明显加重。 结论 外固定架治疗粗隆间骨折，手术创伤小，操作简便，符合生物力学原理，可以早期离床活动及早期骨折愈合。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the effectiveness and advantages of multifunctional external fixator for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patients. Methods Twenty-eight patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures including 11 males and 17 females receiving external fixator treatment between July 2007 and October 2009 were enrolled in this study. Their age ranged from 74 to 91 years old with the average to be 81 years. Twenty-five patients had the disease because of ground falls, and the other 3 were due to traffic accidents. Based on the Evans Type classification, there were 1 Type-Ⅰ case, 15 Type-Ⅲ cases, and 12 Type-Ⅳ cases. The time between injury and surgery was ranged from 2 to 7 days. Results All incisions of the patients healed during phase Ⅰ without delayed healing or other early complications. Follow-up was done to all the patients for 5 to 14 months, averaging 9 months. X-ray showed all fractures healed, and the healing time ranged from 11 to 24 weeks with an average of 17 weeks. No varus or leg shortening or other complications occurred. Three months after surgery, based on the Harris hip score for functional evaluation, there were 18 excellent cases, 7 good cases and 3 poor cases with a excellent and good rate of 89.3%. Mild pin tract infection was detected in 7 patients, moderate in 5, and severe in 2 with a total pin tract infection rate of 50%. Two patients with diabetes suffering from severe pin tract infection recovered by local medication and antibiotics, but the infection reoccurred repeatedly till the healing nails were taken. No bone infection of ulcers occurred, and the existing complications were not aggravated. Conclusion Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with multifunctional external fixator is minimally invasive, simple, and consistent with biomechanical principles, which can promote early activities out of bed and early fracture healing for the patients.
Objective To compare the effectiveness between improved anterolateral approach and lateral approach in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fracture. Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, from 61 patients with senile intertrochanteric fracture treated between February 2008 and February 2010. Of 61 patients, 34 patients underwent improved anterolateral approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (improved group), and 27 patients underwent conventional lateral approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (conventional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, Evans classification, comorbidities, disease duration, or Harris hip scores between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The operation was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time, blood loss, perspective frequency during operation, drainage volume, hospitalization days, and out-of-bed time in the improved group were significantly less than those in the conventional group (P lt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18.7 months). Bone union was achieved in both groups; the fracture healing time was (11.64 ± 1.28) weeks in the improved group and was (12.29 ± 1.12) weeks in the conventional group, showing no significant difference (t=2.15, P=0.15). Harris hip scores at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly better than preoperative scores in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), and significant differences were found among different time points after operation in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), between 2 groups after operation (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of incision infection, limb shortening, coax vara, internal fixation loosening, main screw cutting-out from femoral head between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05), but the incidence of total complications in the improved group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional lateral approach, improved anterolateral approach has the advantages of sufficient exposure, reducing muscle damage and surgical risk in treating intertrochanteric fracture. Operating treatment of improved anterolateral approach combined with early rehabilitation after surgery can recover hip joint function as quickly as possible.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of InterTan in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Between April 2009 and July 2009, 57 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture were treated with InterTan. There were 33 males and 24 females with an average age of 68 years (range, 45-88 years). The locations were left side in 31 cases and right side in 26 cases and all fractures were closed fractures. According to Association for Osteosynthesis/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, there were 23 cases of type 31-A1, 27 of type 31-A2, and 7 of type 31-A3. The disease duration was 2 to 8 days with an average of 3.3 days. The data of operative time, blood loss, perioperative blood transfusion, hospital ization day, fracture heal ing time, and Harris hip score were recorded. Results The operative time and the blood loss were (74.5 ± 19.7) minutes and (148.8 ± 79.6) mL, respectively. There were significant differences in the operative time and the blood loss among the AO/OTA subgroups (P lt; 0.05). Twenty-five patients required a blood transfusion and the transfusion volume was (264.0 ± 90.7) mL. The average hospital ization days were 7 days (range, 6-9 days). Thirty-five patients were followed up 12 to 15 months (13.3 months on average). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed within (2.8 ± 0.8) months. The heal ing time of fracture was (2.4 ± 0.6), (2.9 ± 0.9), and (3.8 ± 0.5) months in 31-A1 subgroup, 31-A2 subgroup, and 31-A3 subgroup, respectively. There was no significant difference in heal ing time of fracture between 31-A1 subgroup and 31-A2 subgroup (P gt; 0.05), and there were significant differences between 31-A3 group and 31-A1 subgroup, 31-A2 subgroup (P lt; 0.05). No shortening, cut-out, varus malposition, femoral shaft fracture, or implant failures was found. The Harris score at the final follow-up was 84.5 ± 8.2 with an excellent and good rate of 80% (15 cases of excellent, 13 of good, 6 of fair, and 1 of poor). Twenty patients (57%) recovered the walking abil ity. Conclusion The new intertrochanteric antegrade nail of InterTan can be used to treat femoral intertrochanteric fractures with good cl inical outcomes, high union rate, and less compl ications.