目的:观察相同剂量不同浓度的罗哌卡因用于腰丛坐骨神经联合阻滞的临床效果。方法:择期行单侧下肢手术的患者90例,年龄18~65岁,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,随机分为3组(n=30):A组给予0.3 ％的罗哌卡因腰丛36 mL、坐骨神经24 mL,B组给予0.36 ％的罗哌卡因腰丛30 mL、坐骨神经24 mL,C组给予0.4％罗哌卡因腰丛27 mL、坐骨神经18 mL。分别于给药后2、5、10、15、20、25、30、35 min测定下肢的感觉、运动评分以及感觉阻滞的时间和运动阻滞的时间。结果:三组患者阻滞起效时间无明显差别,高容量组完全阻滞的持续时间短于低容量组;高容量低浓度组患者完全阻滞率高于低容量组,但达到完全阻滞时间长于低容量组。结论:在剂量相同时罗哌卡因的浓度和容量会影响腰丛和坐骨神经的阻滞 效果;高容量罗哌卡因更有利于达到良好的感觉阻滞。
Objectives To overview the systematic reviews/meta-analyses of safety of femoral nerve block (FNB) used as a postoperative analgesic technique in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods We searched databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP from inception to July, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and used AMSTAR to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. The major indexes used to evaluate the safety of FNB were the incidence rates of symptoms including nausea, vomiting, sedation, retention of urine, dizziness, pruritus, hypotension, falls, nenous thromboembolism and deep infection. Results A total of 12 systematic reviews/meta-analyses were included.They assessed the safety of FNB compared with local infiltration analgesia (LIA), periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI), epidural analgesia (EA), patient-controlled intravenous analgesia of opioids (PCA) and adductor canal block (ACB), respectively. The methodological quality of included studies were medium, with the scores between 3 to 10. The results of overview indicated that: FNB had lower incidence rates of nausea and vomiting compared with EA and PCA, but had higher than ACB. FNB had lower incidence rates of sedation and retention of urine compared with EA and PCA. FNB had lower incidence rates of dizziness compared with EA and PCA, and lower incidence rate of hypotension compared with EA. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that FNB is safer than EA and PCA. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions are needed to be verified by more high-quality studies.
ObjectiveTo summarize the early postoperative pain management strategies for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and to select a reasonable and effective pain management plan to promote functional rehabilitation after ACLR. MethodsThe literature about the early postoperative pain management strategies of ACLR both domestically and internationally in recent years was extensiverly reviewed, and the effects of improving postoperative pain were reviewed. ResultsCurrently, physical therapy and oral medication have advantages such as economy and simplicity, but the effect of improving postoperative pain is not satisfactory, often requires a combination of intravenous injection or intravenous pump, which is also a common way to relieve pain. However, in order to meet the analgesic needs of patients, the amount of analgesic drugs used is often large, which increases the incidence of various adverse reactions. Local infiltration analgesia (LIA), including periarticular or intra-articular injection of drugs, can significantly improve the early postoperative pain of ACLR, and achieve similar postoperative effectiveness as nerve block. LIA can be used as an analgesic technique instead of nerve block, and avoid the corresponding weakness of innervated muscles caused by nerve block, which increases the risk of postoperative falls. Many studies have confirmed that LIA can alleviate postoperative early pain in ACLR, especially the analgesic effects of periarticular injection are more satisfactory. It can also avoid the risk of cartilage damage caused by intra-articular injection. However, the postoperative analgesic effect and timeliness still need to be improved. It is possible to consider combining multimodal mixed drug LIA (combined with intra-articular and periarticular) with other pain intervention methods to exert a synergistic effect, in order to avoid the side effects and risks brought by single drugs or single administration route. LIA is expected to become one of the most common methods for relieving postoperative early pain in ACLR. ConclusionEarly pain after arthroscopic ACLR still affects the further functional activities of patients, and all kinds of analgesic methods can achieve certain effectiveness, but there is no unified standard at present, and the advantages and disadvantages of various analgesic methods need further research.
Nevus flammeus is a skin disease caused by congenital skin capillary malformation. In recent years, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been proved to be effective and safe for this disease, but significant pain in the treatment process is the biggest obstacle to the implementation of this therapy. This article reviews the current pain management strategies in PDT. The current pain management methods include topical anesthesia, cold air analgesia, nerve block and others. Topical anesthesia has weak analgesic effect and short duration in PDT. Cold air analgesia is simple and feasible, but there is potential risk of affecting the treatment effect. The analgesic effect of nerve block is accurate, but the application scenario is limited. For nevus flammeus patients who need PDT, individualized analgesia should be selected according to the patient’s age and treatment scenario.
Objective To study the neural mechanism of hypotension or shock state in acute cholangitis in severe type (ACST) and its value of clinical application. Methods A technique of blocking abdominal splanchnic nervi via right adipose capsule of kidney was carried out on 28 patients by injecting 1% lidocaine before urgent operation. Results After blocking the relevant nervi, hypotension or shock state in 23 patients were improved significantly (Ｐ＜0.05). The death rate was lower (14.3%) after having performed biliary decompressions with laparotomy. Conclusion Patients′ hypotension or shock state at the early phase of ACST is the result of neural reflex in which the splanchnic nervi is its afferent pathway. Blocking the relevant nervi before urgent operation, the valuable opportunity of emergency treatment can be obtainded and the complication and death rate are reduced significantly.
ObjectiveTo explore the safety and efficacy of thoracoscopic guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in resection of lung, and to provide strategies for enhanced recovery after surgery of lung surgery. MethodsA total of 180 patients with thoracoscopic surgery of lung (including sublobar resection and lobectomy) hospitalized between May 2021 and June 2023 were included. There were 108 females and 72 males with an average age of (62.15±7.36) years. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Patients received subcutaneous injection of ropivacaine (concentration: 0.375%, dose: 2 mg/kg) on peripheral incision at chest closing were allocated into a group A. Patients received ultrasound-guided injection of ropivacaine (concentration: 0.375%, dose: 2 mg/kg) at the TPVB point after chest closing into a group B. Patients received thoracoscopic guided injection of ropivacaine (concentration: 0.375%, dose: 2 mg/kg) before chest closing at the TPVB point into a group C. The baseline data of each group were compared, and the effectiveness outcomes included perioperative adverse drug reactions, pain scores, postoperative analgesic drug use and postoperative hospital stay were compared among the 3 groups. ResultsThere were no statistical differences in the baseline data of three groups, including age, weight, gender, incidence of previous underlying diseases, operation time, number of surgical incisions, number of drainage tubes inserted, and dosage of sufentanil or propofol used during surgery (P>0.05). There were no adverse anesthesia events in the 3 groups during the operation, the frequency of self-controlled intravenous analgesia pump, the VAS score, the incidence of adverse reactions, and the rate of postoperative analgesic drug use in group C was less or lower than the other two groups (P<0.05). The hospital stay in the group C and group B were lower than that in the group A (P<0.05). ConclusionThoracoscopic guided TPVB can reduce postoperative pain without increasing postoperative side effects, which had accelerated the enhanced recovery after surgery of lung.
目的:观察在经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术中采用闭孔神经阻滞减少闭孔反射的情况及远期疗效。方法:选取2005年1月～2006年5月期间我科收治的60例确诊膀胱肿瘤患者,严格按照手术适应症随机分为两组:对照组30例单纯硬膜外麻下行经尿道肿瘤电切术,治疗组30例在硬膜外麻醉基础上进行闭孔神经阻滞,观察两组闭孔反射发生率并进行术后随访,观察肿瘤的复发情况。结果:对照组闭孔反射发生率明显高于治疗组(Plt;0.05),经过随访治疗组30例患者3例出现了膀胱肿瘤复发,复发率为10.0%,对照组复发率为13.3%(4/30),两组复发率无明显差异(Pgt;0.05)。结论:在经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术中采取闭孔神经阻滞能明显减少闭孔反射的发生,明显提高手术的效果,但是改善膀胱肿瘤近期和远期疗效还有待进一步探讨。
Objective To systematically evaluate effectiveness and safety of nerve block therapy for neck pain. Methods Databases including CENTRAL, PubMed, Ovid, ISI, EBSCO, CBM and CNKI were searched from the date of their establishment to November 2011, and relevant references were also retrieved manually to collect both domestic and abroad randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about nerve block therapy for neck pain. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then the meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 10 studies involving 625 participants were included. The results of qualitative analysis showed that: a) The short-term effectiveness of the nerve block therapy group was markedly superior to the placebo group, the cognitive therapy group and the transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) group; and b) The short-term effectiveness of the combined nerve block therapy was markedly superior to the single nerve block therapy. The results of meta-analysis demonstrated that: a) There was no significant difference between the greater occipital nerve (GON) block group and the C2/3 nerve block group in neither short-term (SMD=−0.13, 95%CI −0.58 to 0.32, P=0.58) nor medium-term effectiveness (SMD=−0.01, 95%CI −0.46 to 0.44, P=0.98); and b): There was no significant difference between the injection with steroids group and the injection without steroids group in both short-term (SMD=0.16, 95%CI −0.13 to 0.44, P=0.28) and long-term effectiveness (SMD=0.27, 95%CI −0.02 to 0.55, P=0.07). Conclusion Current evidence shows nerve block therapy for neck pain is safe and especially good in short-term effectiveness. The combined nerve block therapy is probably more effective, but the effectiveness is not obviously improved by injection with or without steroids, and by different block methods. Due to the limitation of quality, quantity and total sample size of the included studies, this conclusion still needs to be proved by conducting more high quality and large scale studies.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of stellate ganglion block (SGB) on postoperative palpebral edema in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm surgery. MethodsSixty patients who were scheduled to undergo intracranial aneurysm surgery between September 2012 and Novermber 2014 were recruited, and were assigned into 2 groups randomly with 30 in each:SGB group and control group. Patients in SGB group were administered SGB by injecting 0.3% ropivacaine on the operative side under the ultrasound guidance after surgery completed, while patients in the control group received injection of saline on the operative side under the ultrasound guidance. Incidence of postoperative palpebral edema at hour 24, 48, and 72 after surgery were measured. Numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to detect the severity of uncomfortable symptoms for palpebral swelling during rest state. The severity of palpebral edema was evaluated with continuous rating scale (0-5, 0 indicated normal palpebral, and higher score indicated more serious palpebral edema). Complications related with SGB were recorded. ResultsThe overall incidence of palpebral edema at hour 24 after surgery in SGB group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of palpebral edema at hour 48 and 72 after surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). The palpebral edema rating scores of the SGB group at hour 24 after surgery were lower than those of the control group (P<0.01).The incidence of palpebral edema which was scored 3 or more at hour 24 and 48 after surgery in SGB group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of palpebral edema which was scored 3 or more at hour 72 after surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). No complication related with SGB was found. ConclusionSGB can safely reduce the incidence of postoperative palpebral edema in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm surgery, and reduce the severity of palpebral edema.
Objective To overview the systematic reviews/meta-analyses of efficacy of FNB used as a postoperative analgesic technique among patients undergoing TKR. Methods We electronically searched databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from inception to July, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature and extracted data. AMSTAR tool was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. The primary outcome was pain scores and the consumption of opoid medicine to evaluate the effectiveness of FNB. Results A total of 16 systematic reviews/meta-analyses were included, involving the FNBvs. LIA, PMDI, EA, PCA and ACB, respectively. The results of quality assessment indicated medium scores with 3 to 9 scores. The overviews’ results showed that: at rest, FNB was not superior to LIA at 6h after TKR; it was superior to PMDI at 12h after TKR; it was also superior to PCA and LIA, but not superior to ACB at 24h after TKR. On movement, FNB was superior to PCA and LIA at 24h after TKR; it was also superior to PCA at 48h after TKR. As to the consumption of opoid medicine, the consumption in FNB group was more than LIA group at 12h after TKR. In addition, the consumption in FNB group was less than PCA and LIA at 24h after TKR, and it was also less than PCA and ACB at 48h. The satisfaction of patients who received FNB was better than ACB, EA and PCA. Conclusion The current overview shows that FNB is more effective than PCA and LIA, the patients’ satisfaction is better. Due to the limitations of the quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions are needed to be verified by more studies.