Daytime hip arthroplasty refers to a medical procedure where a patient undergoes admission, surgery, and discharge all within a single day (24 hours). The establishment of daytime hip arthroplasty centers signifies a significant paradigm shift in the development model of modern hospitals. While numerous nationally accredited large medical institutions are undertaking daytime hip arthroplasty in various forms and scales, there remains a lack of standardized system processes and criteria. In this context, the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders (Xiangya Hospital), Bone and Joint Specialty Committee of the China Ambulatory Surgery Alliance, Joint Surgery Branch of the Chinese Orthopedic Association, and Osteoarthritis Study Group of the Chinese Association of Orthopedic Surgeons have collaboratively organized experts in the relevant field domestically. Leveraging international experiences in daytime hip arthroplasty and integrating them with the clinical practices of well-established medical institutions conducting daytime surgeries in China, they have arrived at consensus recommendations. These recommendations cover the establishment of daytime hip arthroplasty centers, policies, procedures, and perioperative management. The ultimate goal is to provide reference points and guidance for the standardized implementation of daytime hip arthroplasty.
Objective To explore the application of quality control circle in reducing the same-day cancellation rate of day surgery. Methods A quality control circle team was set up, and determined the theme of reducing the same-day cancellation rate of day surgery. A survey was conducted among all patients who had made appointments for day surgeries at the First Affiliated Hospital of the Air Force Military Medical University between August and October 2023. The number of patients who cancelled their surgeries on the day and the reasons for their cancellations were recorded. Based on the ten steps of the quality control circle, relevant measures and improvement processes were formulated. In March 2024, the same-day cancellation rate of day surgery after the quality control circle activity was analyzed. Results The same-day cancellation rate decreased from 2.39% to 0.67%, the target achievement rate was 135.43%, and the progress rate was 71.97%. Conclusion The quality control circle activity can effectively reduce the same-day cancellation rate of day surgery.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of day surgery mode and inpatient operation mode for intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients.MethodsThirty-seven elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated in day surgery mode in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from July 2018 to July 2019 were retrospectively included. At the same time, another 37 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated in general inpatient operation mode in the same period were randomly selected. The preoperative waiting time, operation time, length of hospital stay, hospital expenses, postoperative complications, and clinical effect were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time [(56.21±10.75) vs. (58.81±12.56) min] or postoperative Harris hip scores (1 month after surgery: 61.03±7.74 vs. 59.47±7.42; 3 months after surgery: 85.40±4.22 vs. 85.03±4.33) between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of the preoperative waiting time [(23.17±3.18) vs. (52.64±10.12) h], length of hospital stay [(2.01±0.97) vs. (8.34±4.22) d], hospital expenses [(4.012±0.771)×104 vs. (4.679±1.117)×104 yuan], and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis during perioperative period (10.8% vs.37.8%), the day surgery mode group had more obvious advantages than general inpatient operation mode group (P<0.05).ConclusionsDay surgery mode is safe and effective for intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients. It is worthy of great application for clinical work in the future.
As one of the crucial measures in the action plan for improving health services, day surgery is committed to efficiently integrating medical resources and improving the quality of medical services. Nowadays, public hospitals in China are vigorously promoting the day surgery cases. The normalization of day surgery is also one of the major goals for the Department of Gastroenterology to meet the current medical needs and explore sub-professional development in line with the discipline’s advantages. Taking the current status of day surgery in the Department of Gastroenterology of West China Hospital of Sichuan University as an example, this paper explores and constructs the “Huaxi Model of Day Surgery in the Department of Gastroenterology”, focusing on the management mode, operation process, operation implementation, quality and safety assurance of day surgery, so as to facilitate the exchange of experiences.
Due to optimizing medical service resources and improving service efficiency, day surgery has attracted the attention of medical and management experts worldwide. In 2019, day surgery was included as one of the performance assessment indicators of tertiary public hospitals. In recent years, hospital-based day surgery centers have begun to plan and build. Although the basic facilities have been perfectly improved, but how to efficiently and safely operate and manage the centralized day surgery has become the primary problem to clinicians and managers. The purpose of this paper is to introduce how the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University uses scientific management tools and establishes a professional multidisciplinary team, so as to carry out efficient operation management and control of medical quality and safety risks of the Day Surgery Center. And then provide practical experience guidance and suggestions with strong feasibility and operability for peers.
Objective To establish the mode of anterior cervical surgery in outpatient setting, and evaluate its preliminary effectiveness. Methods A clinical data of patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery between January 2022 and September 2022 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. The surgeries were performed in outpatient setting (n=35, outpatient setting group) or in inpatient setting (n=35, inpatient setting group). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in age, gender, body mass index, smoking, history of alcohol drinking, disease type, the number of surgical levels, operation mode, as well as preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale score of neck pain (VAS-neck), and visual analogue scale score of upper limb pain (VAS-arm). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total hospital stay, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital expenses of the two groups were recorded; JOA score, VAS-neck score, and VAS-arm score were recorded before and immediately after operation, and the differences of the above indexes between pre- and post-operation were calculated. Before discharge, the patient was asked to score satisfaction with a score of 1-10. Results The total hospital stay, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital expenses were significantly lower in the outpatient setting group than in the inpatient setting group (P<0.05). The satisfaction of patients was significantly higher in the outpatient setting group than in the inpatient setting group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time and intraoperative blood loss (P>0.05). The JOA score, VAS-neck score, and VAS-arm score of the two groups significantly improved at immediate after operation when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement of the above scores between the two groups (P>0.05). The patients were followed up (6.67±1.04) months in the outpatient setting group and (5.95±1.90) months in the inpatient setting group, with no significant difference (t=0.089, P=0.929). No surgical complications, such as delayed hematoma, delayed infection, delayed neurological damage, and esophageal fistula, occurred in the two groups. Conclusion The safety and efficiency of anterior cervical surgery performed in outpatient setting were comparable to that performed in inpatient setting. Outpatient surgery mode can significantly shorten the postoperative hospital stay, reduce hospital expenses, and improve the patients’ medical experience. The key points of the outpatient mode of anterior cervical surgery are minimizing damage, complete hemostasis, no drainage placement, and fine perioperative management.
ObjectiveTo analyze the current situation of day surgery patients’ withdrawal from hospitalization, and put forward reasonable and effective measures and suggestions.MethodsDescriptive statistical analysis and trend chi-square test were conducted on the hospitalization withdrawal rate of day surgery in the Day Surgery Ward of the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine from 2012 to 2020. The reasons for hospitalization withdrawal and the operation methods of withdrawn cases from 2019 to 2020 were descriptively analyzed.ResultsFrom 2012 to 2020, the hospitalization withdrawal rate of day surgery decreased from 4.48% to 2.19%, with a significant decrease and a linear downward trend (χ2trend=138.500, P<0.001). From 2019 to 2020, patient factor was the most important reason for hospitalization withdrawal of day surgery, accounting for 79.72%; secondly, long waiting time for surgery, abnormal examination results, inadequate preoperative evaluation, medical insurance reimbursement, epidemic situation in 2020 and other reasons had affected the patients’ hospitalization withdrawal of day surgery to varying degrees. Endoscopic lithotripsy accounted for the largest proportion (210 cases, accounting for 20.87%) in the withdrawn procedures from 2019 to 2020, followed by minimally invasive rotary resection for breast lesions (126 cases, accounting for 12.52%).ConclusionImproving preoperative evaluation, strengthening preoperative communication, implementing efficient medical treatment, and shortening the waiting time for surgery can reduce the rate of hospitalization withdrawal of day surgery.
Day surgery wards have advantages such as the ability to quickly free up beds and possessing necessary medical resources, making them a focal department for the integration of emergency and routine medical care within healthcare institutions. The Day Surgery Nursing Committee of Sichuan Tianfu New Area Medical Association gathered experts from relevant fields, took into account the actual situation and previous practices of integrating emergency and routine medical care in day surgery wards, and developed this expert consensus. It covers the aspects of emergency plans, process mechanisms, spatial preparations, personnel preparations and deployment, material preparations, and information sharing and coordination of the management model of integrating emergency and routine medical care in day surgery wards, so as to provide professional guidance and references for the management model of integrating emergency and routine medical care in day surgery wards, and offer new ideas and methods to maximize patient treatment during emergency situations.