Forty cases of intertrochanteric fractures of femur were treated with percutaneous nonmetallic external fixator. The patients were followed up for 6 months to 3 years, and the fractures were all united without coxa vara or shirtening deformities. There was no mortality in this series. This method had the advantages ofbeing simple, save time and effort, less traumatic and early ambulation. The design of the apparatus tallied with the biomechanics of the neck and shaft of the femur.
【摘要】 目的 探讨多功能外固定支架治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效和优点。 方法 2007年7月-2009年10月，采用外固定架治疗28例老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者，其中男11例，女17例；年龄74~91岁，平均81岁。致伤原因:摔伤25例，交通事故伤3例。骨折按Evans分型:Ⅰ型1例，Ⅲ型15例，Ⅳ型12例。受伤至手术时间2~7 d。 结果 术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合，无延迟愈合及其他早期并发症发生。28例均获随访，随访时间5~14个月，平均9个月。X线片示骨折全部愈合，愈合时间11～24周，平均17周。无髋内翻和下肢短缩等并发症发生。术后3个月，采用Harris评分进行功能评价，优18例，良7例，差3例，优良率89.3%。出现轻度针道感染7例，中度5例，重度2例，针道感染率50%；合并糖尿病者2例出现中度针道感染，2例出现重度针道感染。重度者经局部换药、应用抗生素后愈合，后又反复出现，2~3个月取钉后愈合。无骨感染发生，患者均未出现褥疮，合并症无明显加重。 结论 外固定架治疗粗隆间骨折，手术创伤小，操作简便，符合生物力学原理，可以早期离床活动及早期骨折愈合。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the effectiveness and advantages of multifunctional external fixator for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patients. Methods Twenty-eight patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures including 11 males and 17 females receiving external fixator treatment between July 2007 and October 2009 were enrolled in this study. Their age ranged from 74 to 91 years old with the average to be 81 years. Twenty-five patients had the disease because of ground falls, and the other 3 were due to traffic accidents. Based on the Evans Type classification, there were 1 Type-Ⅰ case, 15 Type-Ⅲ cases, and 12 Type-Ⅳ cases. The time between injury and surgery was ranged from 2 to 7 days. Results All incisions of the patients healed during phase Ⅰ without delayed healing or other early complications. Follow-up was done to all the patients for 5 to 14 months, averaging 9 months. X-ray showed all fractures healed, and the healing time ranged from 11 to 24 weeks with an average of 17 weeks. No varus or leg shortening or other complications occurred. Three months after surgery, based on the Harris hip score for functional evaluation, there were 18 excellent cases, 7 good cases and 3 poor cases with a excellent and good rate of 89.3%. Mild pin tract infection was detected in 7 patients, moderate in 5, and severe in 2 with a total pin tract infection rate of 50%. Two patients with diabetes suffering from severe pin tract infection recovered by local medication and antibiotics, but the infection reoccurred repeatedly till the healing nails were taken. No bone infection of ulcers occurred, and the existing complications were not aggravated. Conclusion Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with multifunctional external fixator is minimally invasive, simple, and consistent with biomechanical principles, which can promote early activities out of bed and early fracture healing for the patients.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of suspension fixation plus hinged external fixator with double plate internal fixation in the treatment of type C humeral intercondylar fractures. Methods Between January 2014 and April 2016, 30 patients with type C (Association for the Study of Internal Fixation, AO/ASIF) humeral intercondylar fractures were treated. Kirschner wire suspension fixation plus hinged external fixator was used in 14 cases (group A), and double plate internal fixation in 16 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, disease duration, injury side, and type of fracture between 2 groups (P>0.05). Results There was no significant difference in operation time and hospitalization stay between 2 groups (P>0.05). But the intraoperative blood loss in group A was significantly less than that in group B (P<0.05); the visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 1 day and 3 days after operation in group A were significantly less than those in group B (P<0.05). Primary healing of incision was obtained in all patients of 2 groups, and no surgery-related complications occurred. The patients were followed up 6-24 months (mean, 12.3 months) in group A and 6-24 months (mean, 12.8 months) in group B. The self-evaluation satisfaction rate was 85.7% (12/14) in group A and was 81.2% (13/16) in group B at 3 months after operation, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.055, P=0.990). Based on the improved Gassebaum elbow performance score at 6 months after operation, excellent and good rate of the elbow function was 78.6% (excellent in 5 cases, good in 6 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case) in group A and was 81.2% (excellent in 6 cases, good in 7 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case) in group B, showing no significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=0.056, P=0.990). Heterotopic ossification occurred at 3 months after operation in 1 case of each group respectively. The X-ray films showed bony union in all cases; no loosening or breakage of screw was observed. The bone union time showed no significant difference between 2 groups (t=–0.028, P=0.978). The time of internal fixation removal, the intraoperative blood loss, and VAS score at 1 day and 3 days after operation in group A were significant better than those in group B (P<0.05). Conclusion The suspension fixation plus hinged external fixator and double plate internal fixation for the treatment of type C humeral intercondylar fractures have ideal outcome in elbow function. But the suspension fixation plus hinged external fixator is better than double plate internal fixation in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative VAS score, and time of internal fixation removal.
Objective To compare effects, advantages and disadvantages of simple internal fixation to that of l imited internal fixation with external supporting frame fixation in the treatment of complex fractures of tibial plateau. Methods From July 2002 to August 2006, 66 cases of complex fractures of the tibial plateau were divided into the internal fixation group (n=39) and the external fixator group (n=27). The interal fixation group had 18 cases of IV, 7 cases V and 14 cases VI according to Schatzker, including 25 males and 14 females aged 18-79 years with an average of 45.4 years. The external fixator group had 13 cases of IV, 6 cases V and 8 cases VI according to Schatzker, including 18 males and 9 femles aged 18-64 years with an average of 44.2 years. No significant difference was evident between the two groups (P gt; 0.05). Patients were treated by using screws, steel plates or external supporting frame fixation strictly based on the princi ple of internalfixation. Results All patients were followed up for 1-5 years. Fracture healed with no occurrence of nonunion. Two cases inthe internal fixation group presented partial skin infection and necrosis, and were cured through the dressing change and flap displacement. Fracture heal ing time was 6-14 months with an average of 7.3 months. The time of internal fixator removal was 6-15 months with an average of 8.3 months. In the external fixation group, 11 cases had nail treated fluid 7 days to 3 months after operation, combining with red local skin; 3 cases had skin necrosis; and 3 cases had loose bolts during follow-up. Through debridement, dressing change and flap displacement, the skin wounds healed. Fracture heal ing time was 3-11 months with an average of 5.1 months. The time of external fixator removal was 5-11 months with an average of 6.4 months. At 8-14 months after operation, the knee function was assessed according to Merchant criteria. In the internal fixation group, 29 cases were excellent, 4 good, 5 fair and 1 poor, while in the external fixation group, 20 cases were excellent, 3 good, 2 fair and 2 poor. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effects of simple internal fixation and l imited internal fixation with external supporting frame fixation were similar in the treatment of complex fractures of tibial plateau. Fixation materials should be selected according to the state of injury and bone conditions for the treatment of tibial plateau fracture of type IV, V and VI based on Sehatzker classification.
目的:评价外固定支架治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效。方法:2004年3月至2008年8月以外固定支架或辅以克氏针、可吸收螺钉内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折３7例。结果:31例获得4～28 个月(平均14 个月)的随访,所有骨折均临床愈合,平均愈合时间8周。腕关节功能按Sarmiento标准进行评定,优17例,良9例,可4例,差1例,优良率839%。结论:外固定支架治疗桡骨远端骨折疗效可靠,值得推广。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of limited internal fixation combined with hinged super-articular external fixator to treat type C3 fracture of the distal humerus. MethodsBetween September 2007 and November 2012, 37 cases of type C3 fracture of the distal humerus were treated. There were 22 males and 15 females with an average age of 43.6 years (range, 22-66 years). The causes were accident injury in 24 cases, falling injury in 5 cases, falling from height in 4 cases, heavy crush injury in 2 cases, machine injury in 1 case, and other injury in 1 case. There were 22 cases of open injury and 15 cases of closed injury. The time from injury to operation was 3-46 hours (mean, 18 hours). ResultsNeedle tract reaction and incision infection occurred in 3 cases and 1 case respectively, healing of incision by first intension was obtained in the other cases. Thirty-six patients were followed up 9-48 months (mean, 25.4 months). Heterotopic ossification occurred in 3 cases after operation and no recurrence was found by release after fracture healing. Fractures healed in the other patients after 6-14 months (mean, 9 months) of operation except 1 patient who suffered chronic osteomyelitis. One patient had delayed ulnar neuritis at 12 months after operation, and the nerve function returned to normal after the ulnar nerve transposition. There was no bone ischemic necrosis, elbow joint instability, or loosening of internal fixation. At last follow-up, the average range of motion of injured elbow was 105.0° in flexion,-25.0° in extension, 69.2° in pronation, and 75.6° in supination. According to Mayo elbow joint function score (MEPS) and disability of arm shoulder and hand (DASH) score, the results were excellent in 22 cases, good in 8 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 2 cases with an excellent and good rate of 83.3%; and according to Cassebaum elbow joint function score, the results were excellent in 21 cases, good in 7 cases, fair in 5 cases, and poor in 3 cases with an excellent and good rate of 77.8%. ConclusionA combination of limited internal fixation and hinged super-articular external fixator has satisfactory clinical curative effect for type C3 fractures of the distal humerus, relatively few complications.
Objective To investigate the mid- and long-term effectiveness of external fixator distraction arthroplasty in the treatment of moderate to severe ankle arthritis. Methods The clinical data of 23 patients with moderate to severe ankle arthritis treated with external fixation distraction arthroplasty who met the selection criteria between January 2007 and November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 20 males and 3 females; the age ranged from 21 to 65 years, with an average age of 43.7 years. Etiology included 8 cases of primary ankle arthritis, in which 5 cases combined with varus deformity; 15 cases of traumatic ankle arthritis, the cause of injury was 5 cases after ankle fracture surgery, 3 cases after Pilon fracture surgery, 5 cases of chronic ankle instability and repeated sprain, and 2 cases of other causes. According to Takakura staging system, there were 4 cases of stage ⅢA, 12 cases of stage ⅢB, and 7 cases of stage Ⅳ; according to Giannini staging system, there were 5 cases of stage Ⅱ and 18 cases of stage Ⅲ; according to Cheng staging system, 16 cases were in stage Ⅲ, and 7 cases stage Ⅳ. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were used to evaluate the improvement of ankle pain and function before operation and at last follow-up, and the data were analyzed according to different etiological groups. At last follow-up, the surgical results were evaluated subjectively and objectively. The changes of ankle joint space before operation and at last follow-up were compared. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age: ≤45 years old group [young group, 10 cases, aged (35.62±7.41) years old] and >45 years old group [middle-aged and elderly group, 13 cases, aged (54.20±6.20) years old]. The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score were compared before and after operation between the two groups, and the influence of age on distraction arthroplasty was analyzed. ResultsThe external fixator was removed after 3 months of continuous distraction,12 patients got infection around the wire tunnels. All the 23 patients were followed up 13-143 months, with an average of 56.9 months; the follow-up time was (43.46±32.77) months and (69.80±37.79) months in the young group and middle-aged and elderly group, respectively. At last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). According to etiological analysis, there was no significant difference in AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score before and after operation (P>0.05) in Pilon fracture patients, while the significant difference was found in remaining patients (P<0.05). There was significant difference in AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score before operation between the young group and the middle-aged and elderly group (t=2.110, P=0.040), but no significant difference in preoperative VAS score and the differences in VAS score and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score before and after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The subjective and objective results of pain evaluation at last follow-up showed that 4 patients had no pain, 12 patients had moderate pain relief, 5 patients had mild pain relief, and 2 patients had no significant pain relief; among the 10 patients who were followed up more than 5 years, there were 2, 5, 2, and 1 patient, respectively; 2 patients who were followed up more than 10 years had moderate pain relief. At last follow-up, the ankle joint space was (3.7±0.4) mm, which significantly increased when compared with before operation [(1.5±0.2) mm] (t=1.791, P=0.002). The ankle joint space was (2.9±0.5) mm in 10 patients who were followed up more than 5 years, and 3.3 mm and 3.0 mm in 2 patients who were followed up more than 10 years. Conclusion Distraction arthroplasty of the ankle joint can achieve satisfactory results in patients with moderate to severe ankle arthritis (except for arthritis caused by Pilon fracture), and age has no significant effect on distraction arthroplasty.