west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "单孔" 110 results
  • Perioperative outcomes of uniportal versus three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for 2 112 lung cancer patients: A propensity score matching study

    Objective To analyze the perioperative outcomes of uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy compared with three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods Data were extracted from the Western China Lung Cancer Database, a prospectively maintained database at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Perioperative outcomes of the patients who underwent uniportal or three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer during January 2014 through April 2021 were analyzed by using propensity score matching. Altogether 5 817 lung cancer patients were enrolled who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy (uniportal: 530 patients; three-port: 5 287 patients). After matching, 529 patients of uniportal and 1 583 patients of three-port were included. There were 529 patients with 320 males and 209 females at median age of 58 (51, 65) years in the uniportal group and 1 583 patients with 915 males and 668 females at median age of 58 (51, 65) years in the three-port group. Results Uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (20 mL vs. 30 mL, P<0.001), longer operative time (115 min vs. 105 min, P<0.001) than three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the number of lymph node dissected, rate of conversion to thoracotomy, incidence of postoperative complication, postoperative pain score within 3 postoperative days, length of hospital stay, or hospitalization expenses. Conclusion Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is safe and effective, and the overall perioperative outcomes are comparable between uniportal and three-port strategies, although the two groups show differences in intraoperative blood loss.

    Release date:2021-09-18 02:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Progress in single-incision laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer

    With the upgrading of minimally invasive surgical concepts and laparoscopic equipment for gastric cancer, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) had emerged as a new focus of research in gastric cancer surgery. SILS offered advantages such as reduced damage, superior cosmetic outcomes, decreased postoperative pain, and faster recovery as compared with traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, its level of difficulty limited its further promotion and application. Although numerous studies supported the safety and feasibility of SILS, more high-level evidence-based medical research was required to endorse its widespread use. The author reviewed the development history, current status, and prospects of SILS laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

    Release date:2023-10-27 11:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 单孔腹腔镜胆囊逆行切除术的学习曲线分析

    目的 总结采用常规腹腔镜器械进行逆行切除法在单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中应用的学习曲线。 方法 回顾性分析中国医科大学附属盛京医院单一主刀医生于 2012 年 7 月至 2015 年 12 月期间施行的连续单孔腹腔镜手术的 120 例患者的临床资料,单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中采用常规腹腔镜器械进行胆囊逆行切除。 结果 所有患者的手术都顺利进行。手术施行期间,手术时间随手术例数增加而明显减少,10 例以后手术时间基本稳定。前期组和后期组患者的手术花费、帕瑞昔布钠剂量和美容评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但与前期组比较,后期组的手术时间较短,术中出血量较少,术后住院时间较短,中转多孔率和并发症发生率较低,视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)较低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中采用常规腹腔镜器械进行胆囊逆行切除的学习曲线短,易于术者掌握。

    Release date:2017-06-19 11:08 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single Site Cholecystectomy: A Report of 62 Cases

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the security and feasibility of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (TULESC) with conventional laparoscopic instruments. MethodsThe clinical data of 62 adult patients undergoing TULESC between October 2011 and June 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 13 males and 49 females aged between 22 and 70 years old averaging 40±15. Forty-nine patients suffered from chronic cholecystitis with cholelithiasis, 10 from asymptomatic cholelithiasis and 3 from cholecystic polyposis. A single arc incision was cut on the edge of the umbilicus, and two 10 mm Trocars and one 5 mm Trocar were placed by puncture. Cholecystectomy was performed with conventional laparoscopic instruments and equipment. ResultsAll the 62 patients underwent TULESC successfully without severe complications such as bile leakage or biliary injury. The operation time was 20-70 minutes with the average of (40±15) minutes; The blood loss was 5-40 mL with the average of (15±10) mL. All the patients were discharged from the hospital within 3 to 7 days after surgery, averaging 4.0±1.0. During the 1 to 12-month follow-up (averaging 3 months), there was no obviously visible scars on the abdominal wall and the aesthetic effect was significant. ConclusionTULESC with conventional laparoscopic instruments and equipment is safe, feasible and cosmetic.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Analysis of risk factors for pulmonary complications in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax after micro single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

    ObjectiveTo analyze the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) and the risk factors in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax who underwent micro single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).MethodsA total of 158 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax who underwent micro single-port VATS in our hospital from April 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively included, including 99 males and 59 females, with an average age of 40.53±9.97 years. The patients were divided into a PPC group (n=21) and a non-PPC group (n=137) according to whether PPC occurred after the operation, and the risk factors for the occurrence of PPC were analyzed.ResultsAll 158 patients successfully completed the micro single-port VATS, and there was no intraoperative death. The postoperative chest tightness, chest pain, and dyspnea symptoms basically disappeared. During the postoperative period, there were 3 patients of pulmonary infection, 7 patients of atelectasis, 4 patients of pulmonary leak, 6 patients of pleural effusion, 1 patient of atelectasis and pleural effusion, and the incidence of PPC was 13.29% (21/158). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that lung disease [OR=32.404, 95%CI (2.717, 386.452), P=0.006], preoperative albumin level≤35 g/L [OR=14.912, 95%CI (1.719, 129.353), P=0.014], severe pleural adhesions [OR=26.023, 95%CI (3.294, 205.557), P=0.002], pain grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ 24 hours after the surgery [OR=64.024, 95%CI (3.606, 1 136.677), P=0.005] , age [OR=1.195, 95%CI (1.065, 1.342), P=0.002], intraoperative blood loss [OR=1.087, 95%CI (1.018, 1.162), P=0.013] were the risk factors for PPC after micro single-port VATS.ConclusionThere is a close relationship between PPC after micro single-port VATS and perioperative indexes in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax. Clinically, targeted prevention and treatment can be implemented according to the age, pulmonary disease, preoperative albumin level, intraoperative blood loss, degree of pleural adhesion and pain grading 24 hours after surgery.

    Release date:2022-02-15 02:09 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 经脐单手单孔腹腔镜治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝145例体会

    目的总结经脐单手单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的治疗经验。 方法回顾性分析2013年10月至2015年9月期间我院采用经脐单手单孔腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的145例患者的临床资料。 结果145例腹股沟斜疝患者均在腹腔镜下完成疝囊高位结扎术,每侧手术时间5~8 min(平均6 min),双侧10~15 min(平均12 min)。有20例患儿术中发现对侧存在隐匿性疝,一并行疝囊高位结扎术。术后随访1~12个月,平均5个月,无精索血肿、医源性隐睾、睾丸萎缩、线结排斥反应、感染等并发症;有2例复发,其中1例为单侧疝,其腹膜皱褶严重;另1例为巨大单侧疝,其疝内容物反复突出形成瘢痕疝囊。 结论经脐单手单孔腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝,不仅具备传统腹腔镜手术的优点,而且安全、疗效确切、更加美观、手术时间亦无增加,更加节省人力,优于传统腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术,远期疗效有待更长时间的随访和大宗病例的治疗效果。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery without chest tube in enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery

    ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical feasibility and safety of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) without chest tube in enhanced recovery thoracic surgery.MethodThe clinical data of patients with pulmonary bulla, pulmonary nodules and mediastinal tumors who underwent uniportal VATS in Department of Thoracic Surgery in the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University between January 2015 to May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 78 patients did not receive closed thoracic drainage tube (a tube-free group), including 30 males and 48 females aged 32.5±8.3 years, 92 patients closed thoracic drainage tube after operation (a control group), including 38 males and 54 females aged 31.4±13.6 years. The surgery-related indicators, postoperative complications and visual analogue score (VAS) were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe time of early ambulation and hospital stay after operation in the tube-free group (1.0±0.3 d, 3.3±0.7 d) were significantly shorter than those in the control group (1.8±0.6 d, 5.2±0.8 d) (P=0.000, P=0.000). The VAS pain scores on the first, second and third day after operation in the tube-free group (4.5±1.8, 3.6±2.4, 2.5±1.4) were also significantly lower than those in the control group (6.8±2.2, 5.7±2.9, 3.9±1.2) (P=0.000, P=0.000, P=0.000). Operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the tube-free group (55.3±12.2 min, 21.5±5.1 mL) and the control group (57.1±6.5 min, 22.2±3.5 mL) were not statistically different (P=0.220, P=0.146). There was no pulmonary infection in both groups, and the wound healing rate was 100.0%. There was no significant difference in pneumothorax, pleural effusion, arrhythmia and re-insertion of chest drain between the tube-free group (5 patients, 8 patients, 1 patient, 3 patients) and the control group (1 patient, 4 patients, 2 patients, 1 patient, P=0.145, P=0.134, P=0.885, P=0.499).ConclusionIn strictly screened patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic surgery, no thoracic closed drainage tube can relieve postoperative pain, promote early ambulation activities and enhanced recovery of patients.

    Release date:2019-12-13 03:50 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Single-incision Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery versus Conventional Multiple Ports Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis

    ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus conventional multiple ports VATS for lung cancer. MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2016), EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to April 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing single-incision VATS and conventional multiple ports VATS for lung cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 9 cohort studies involving 1 318 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with the conventional multiple ports VATS group, the single-incision VATS group had shorter chest drainage time (MD=-0.70, 95%CI -1.38 to -0.02, P=0.04), shorter hospital stay (MD=-0.52, 95%CI -0.91 to -0.14, P=0.007), less amount of intraoperative bleeding (MD=-18.49, 95%CI -33.61 to -3.37, P=0.02), lower VAS score at 1 and 3 days after surgery (MD=-0.32, 95%CI -0.51 to -0.14, P=0.000 7; MD=-0.48, 95%CI -0.58 to -0.38, P < 0.000 01). Meanwhile, there were no statistical differences between both groups in operation time (MD=-3.40, 95%CI -13.65 to 6.85, P=0.52), the postoperative complications (OR=0.91, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.27, P=0.56), the number of lymph node dissection (MD=-0.79, 95%CI -2.35 to 0.77, P=0.32), the total cost (MD=0.47, 95%CI -0.39 to 1.32, P=0.28), the intraoperative conversion rate (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.44 to 1.93, P=0.82) and VAS score at 7 days after surgery (MD=-1.18, 95%CI -2.42 to 0.07, P=0.06). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows, single-incision VATS is superior in the surgical trauma to conventional multiple ports VATS in the treatment of lung cancer, However, due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, more large-scale, high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

    Release date:2016-10-02 04:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Operative Techniques of Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery in Treatment of Colorectal Neoplasm

    Objective To summarize the experience of single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to discuss the operative techniques. Methods The clinical data of 21 cases who underwent single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Shengjing Hospital from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2011 were collected and analyzed. Results Of 21 cases underwent single incision laparoscopic surgery, right hemicolectomy performed in 5 cases, sigmoidectomy performed in 2 cases, rectal anterior resection performed in 9 cases, rectal abdominoperineal resection performed in 2 cases, total colectomy performed in 1 case, and colostomy performed in 2 cases. Twenty cases completed by single incision, but 1 case was added an extra 12 mm incision in order to dissect the lower segment of rectum. The operative time was (189±75) min (40-335min);the postoperative hospitalization time was (11.5±3.4) d (7-16d). There were no bleeding, anastomosis leakage or intestinal obstruction after operation, and no incision infection, rupture or hernia were founded. No recurrence was found within 6 months’ follow up after operation. Conclusions Under reasonable selection of indication, single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and feasible, and it also has a satisfactory cosmetic effect and better minimally invasive effect.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • short-term efficacy of uniportal versus three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy: A retrospective cohort study in a single center

    ObjectiveTo explore the safety and short-term efficacy of uniportal and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) anatomical segmentectomy for pulmonary nodules. MethodsThe clinical data of 225 patients with consecutive VATS anatomic segmentectomy by the same surgeon in Xuzhou Central Hospital between December 2019 and February 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. There were 85 males and 140 females with an average age of 57.3±11.6 years. These patients were divided into an uniportal VATS group (128 patients) and a three-port VATS group (97 patients) according to the surgical procedures. Single-direction anatomical procedure was utilized in the uniportal VATS group. The operation time, blood loss during the surgery, number of dissected lymph nodes, duration and volume of chest drainage, incidence of complications, and postoperative hospital stay of the two groups were compared. ResultsThere was no conversion to thoracotomy, addition of surgical ports, or mortality in this cohort, with tumor-negative surgical margins. The postoperative pathological staining confirmed 2 (0.9%) patients of lymph node metastasis (pN1) and 4 (1.8%) patients of adenocarcinoma with micropapillary component. As compared with the three-port VATS group, patients in the uniportal VATS group had shorter operation time (115.6±54.7 min vs. 141.5±62.8 min, P=0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (77.2±49.6 mL vs. 96.9±98.1 mL, P=0.050), less total thoracic drainage [394.0 (258.8, 580.0) mL vs. 530.0 (335.0, 817.5) mL, P=0.010], and shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.7±3.7 d vs. 8.7±3.5 d, P=0.031). Both groups showed similar stations and numbers of dissected lymph nodes, incidence of operation-related complications, duration of chest tube drainage, and the drainage volume in the first and second postoperative days (P>0.05). No tumor recurrence or metastasis was recorded in this cohort during the follow-up of 11 (1-26) months. ConclusionSingle-direction uniportal VATS anatomical segmentectomy is safe and feasible for the treatment of pulmonary nodules, with better short-term efficacy as compared with the three-port VATS procedure, including shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss and thoracic drainage. However, further studies are needed to elucidate the precise indications of segmentectomy for lung cancer.

    Release date:2022-10-26 01:37 Export PDF Favorites Scan
11 pages Previous 1 2 3 ... 11 Next

Format

Content