Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), health authorities at all levels have issued many prevention and control schemes, guidelines, and notices, and medical institutions have also formulated hospital-level COVID-19 prevention and control measures accordingly. However, the epidemic prevention and control work can only be done well when the prevention and control measures are effectively implemented. West China Hospital of Sichuan University has adopted the two-level (hospital-level and department-level) supervision. By clarifying the content and frequency of two-level supervision and adopting multiple forms of supervision, a complete supervision system covering the whole hospital has been formed. Through supervision, risk points in prevention and control were identified and continuous improvement was carried out to promote the implementation of prevention and control measures. This paper introduces the application of two-level supervision in COVID-19 prevention and control in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, providing a reference for peers.
In recent years, along with more importance having been given by health care facilities and health administrative departments nationally, the work force of infection prevention and control is constantly increasing. In the new era, to help infection prevention and control practitioners and all health care workers make the right direction in infection prevention and control professional business and make sure the infection prevention and control measures are implemented, what we need is to define the target of infection prevention and control scientifically, identify obligation subjects, and improve the infection prevention and control system and working mechanism from the top-level.
目的 探讨风险管理在医院感染管理中的应用与效果。 方法 以风险管理知识为指导，通过分析医院感染管理工作中存在或潜在的医院感染风险制订风险管理预防，指导临床规避和化解感染风险，确保医疗安全。 结果 风险管理的实施提高了医院感染管理质量，减少了医院感染的发生。 结论 风险管理在医院感染管理中的应用不仅可以降低医院感染的风险，也提高了医疗质量。Objective To investigate the application of risk management in hospital infection control and its effect. Methods Guided by risk-management knowledge, we analyzed the potential infection risks in hospital infection control work and regulated risk management policies, in order to avoid and defuse the risk of infection and ensure medical safety. Result The implementation of risk management improved the quality of hospital infection control, and reduced the incidence of hospital infections. Conclusion Risk management in hospital infection control can not only reduce the risk of infection, but also improve the quality of care.
When a clustered coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic occurs, how to prevent and control hospital infection is a challenge faced by each medical institution. Under the normalization situation, building an effective prevention and control system is the premise and foundation for medical institutions to effectively prevent and control infection when dealing with clustered epidemics. According to the principles of control theory, medical institutions should quickly switch to an emergency state, and effectively deal with the external and internal infection risks brought by clustered epidemics by strengthening source control measures, engineering control measures, management control measures and personal protection measures. This article summarizes the experience of handling clustered outbreaks in medical institutions in the prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019, and aims to provide a reference for medical institutions to take effective prevention and control measures when dealing with clustered outbreaks.
Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics and drug resistance changes of nosocomial infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) in different types of clinical departments, and to provide evidence for prevention and control of CRKP infection. Methods The hospital infection real-time monitoring system was used to retrospectively collect the inpatients with CRKP nosocomial infection in the First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang from January 2019 to December 2023 as the research objects. According to the different sources of departments, they were divided into intensive care unit (ICU) group, internal medicine group and surgery group. The changes of clinical characteristics and drug resistance to common antibiotics were analyzed. Results A total of 636188 inpatients were monitored, and 225 cases were infected with CRKP, with an overall infection detection rate of 0.035%. The detection rates of CRKP infection in the ICU group, internal medicine group, and surgery group were 0.736% (138/18749), 0.013% (44/336777), and 0.015% (43/280662), respectively, with the ICU group demonstrating a significantly higher rate than the other groups (P<0.05). The detection rates fluctuated in the early stage and then decreased rapidly in different years. The main infection site of CRKP in all groups was lower respiratory tract, but the proportion of device-related infections in the ICU group was higher than that in the internal medicine and surgery groups (P<0.05). In terms of the infected population, there was no significant difference in gender among groups (P>0.05) with the proportion of males more than 60%, while the difference in the proportion of patients aged ≥65 years among groups was statistically significant (P<0.05), with the highest in the internal medicine group (86.36%). The burden of underlying diseases and invasive operation exposure of the infected patients were high, and the proportion of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and indwelling catheters were as high as 69.33% and 83.56%, respectively. The differences in the proportions of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, ≥3 underlying diseases, and surgical and invasive procedures among groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The distribution of infection specimens in each group showed no statistically significant difference (P>0.05), with sputum, blood, and mid-stream urine specimens being the main detected specimens in all groups. The resistance rates of CRKP to penicillins and cephalosporins were more than 93%, and the resistance rates to aminoglycosides and sulfonamides were relatively low and showed a decline year by year. The resistance rate to ceftazidime/avibactam was only 7.41%, but the resistance rate to tigecycline increased. The difference in resistance rate of CRKP to co-trimoxazole among groups was statistically significant (P<0.05), while the differences in resistance to other antimicrobial agents were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions The detection rate, clinical characteristics and drug resistance of CRKP infection in different types of departments of medical institutions are different and changing. It is necessary to strengthen the rational use of antibiotics and the prevention and control of nosocomial infection.
Objective To investigate on the epidemiologic characteristics of nosocomial infection in surgery departments of general hospitals by analyzing the data collected from documents which were published in recent years, so as to provide references for the construction of precautionary system model. Methods Applying comprehensive search strategies, we searched various electronic databases as CBM (1978 to 2008), CNKI (1912 to 2008), VIP (2001 to 2009) and WanFang Data (2001 to 2009). MeSH terms and/or text words included: nosocomial infections, cross infection, hospital infection, prevent and control. Data from top and second grade hospital were included in this analysis. Results Sixty four articles and a total of 1 990 929 inpatients were included. Results showed: average nosocomial infection rate was 4.46%; the total rates of medicine department and surgery department were 23.28% and 17.33% respectively and no significant difference was found between the two departments; the infection rates of G– and G+ germ were 47.71% and 21.31% respectively; the rates of average antibiotics use was 60.59% and the rate of missing report was 12.42%. Noscomial infection was related to season change and the wave peak was from February to May. Conclusion Most of the included studies were retrospective studies and cross-sectional studies. The type of data was inconsistency and incomplete, causing weak strength of evidence. High missing rate of reports makes the precautionary model hard to build in future.
ObjectiveTo investigate the incidence of nosocomial infection in acute and serious schizophrenic inpatients and its risk factors. MethodsBetween January 1st and December 31st, 2012, we investigated 1 621 schizophrenic patients on the status of nosocomial infections according to the hospital standard of nosocomial infection diagnosis. They were divided into infected group and uninfected group according to the survey results. The risk factors were analyzed by logistic regression method. ResultsTwenty-nine infected patients were found among the 1 621 patients, and the incidence rate was 1.79%. Among the nosocomial infections, the most common one was respiratory infection (79.31%), followed by gastrointestinal infection and urinary infection (6.90%). There were significant differences between the two groups of patients in age, hospital stay, positive and negative syndrome scale (PASS), combined somatopathy, the time of protective constraint, modified electraconvulsive therapy (MECT), using two or more antipsychotics drugs, using antibiotics and side effects of drugs (P<0.05). However, there were no statistical differences in gender, age classes, the course of disease, frequency of hospitalization and seasonal incidence of hospital infection (P>0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that hospital stay, positive symptom score, negative symptom score, the time of protective constraint, MECT, using two or more antipsychotics drugs and side effects of drugs were the main risk factors for nosocomial infection of inpatients with psychopathy (P<0.05). ConclusionBased on the different traits and treatments of acute and serious schizophrenia, a screening table of infections should be set. For the high risk group of nosocomial infection, effective measures should be taken to prevent and control the nosocomial infection of patients with schizophrenia.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors for hospital infection in the medical physical examination center of a newly opened hospital, and to explore its prevention and control measures. MethodsBetween April and December 2012, we analyzed the risk factors for hospital infection in the physical examination center of a new hospital. A series of hospital infection prevention and control measures such as carrying out education and training of medical personnel, strengthening the prevention of needle stick injuries, implementing strict disinfection and sterilization, improving environmental hygiene, and implementing medical waste management, were developed. ResultsMedical staff's knowledge of disinfection and sterilization was improved; hand hygiene compliance was increased; hospital environmental hygiene was promoted, and medical waste was properly sorted out. ConclusionTaking reasonable measures for infection prevention and control can increase medical staff's awareness of hospital infection prevention and control, improve their practices of infection control and prevent hospital infections from occurring eventually.
With nearly four decades of progress in healthcare-associated infection prevention and control in China, the national quality control efforts in this field have been ongoing for the past ten years, advancing rapidly with significant achievements. Over the last decade, the team of infection control professionals involved in quality management and control in China has consistently expanded, accompanied by an enhancement of their skills. Management capabilities have steadily grown, and operational mechanisms have been continuously refined. As public hospitals transition into a new phase of high-quality development, emphasizing refined management models and intrinsic development of medical quality, it becomes crucial to further fortify the foundation and foster innovation in infection control work to ensure quality. This article provides an overview of the establishment and implementation of the National Center for Quality Control of Infection Prevention and Control, examines the current shortcomings and challenges in the field, and collectively explores the positioning and direction of the development of quality control efforts for infection prevention and control in China.