Objective To identify the preoperative risk factors for prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE). MethodsThe clinical data of patients who underwent PTE from December 2016 to August 2021 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the postoperative mechanical ventilation time, including a postoperative mechanical ventilation time≤48 h group (≤48 h group) and a postoperative mechanical ventilation time>48 h (PMV) group (>48 h group). Univariable and logistic regression analysis were used to identify the preoperative risk factors for postoperative PMV. ResultsTotally, 90 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 40 patients in the ≤48 h group, including 30 males and 10 females, with a mean age of 45.48±12.72 years, and there were 50 patients in the >48 h group, including 29 males and 21 females, with a mean age of 55.50±10.42 years. The results showed that in the ≤48 h group, the median postoperative ICU stay was 3.0 days, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 15.0 days; in the >48 h group, the median postoperative ICU stay was 7.0 days, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 20.0 days. The postoperative PMV was significantly correlated with tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) [OR=0.839, 95%CI (0.716, 0.983), P=0.030], age [OR=1.082, 95%CI (1.034, 1.132), P=0.001] and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) [OR=1.001, 95%CI (1.000, 1.003), P=0.028]. ConclusionAge and PVR are the preoperative risk factors for PMV after PTE, and TAPSE is the preoperative protective factor for PMV after PTE.
Objective To update available evidence on safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) versus carotid artery stenting (CAS) in treatment of carotid artery stenosis by a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods A comprehensive search was performed of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of science, WanFang, and CNKI databases (from January 1990 to July 2015), to collect articles and past systematic reviews, and then abstraced lists of recent scientific conferences which were related with safety and efficacy of CEA versus CAS in treatment of carotid artery stenosis. At last, Meta analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1 software. Results Fifteen RCTs enrolling 9 828 patients were included in the Meta-analysis. Compared with CAS, CEA was associated with a significantly lower incidences of any stroke or death within 30 days after surgery (OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.51-0.77, P＜0.05) and any stroke or death during follow-up, or ipsilateral stroke after 30 days of operation (OR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76, P＜0.05）, but associated with a significantly greater incidences of myocardial infarction (OR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.14-2.87, P=0.01) and cranial neuropathy (OR=18.28, 95% CI: 7.99-41.82, P＜0.05) within 30 days after surgery. Conclusion In comparison with CAS, CEA is associated with a lower incidences of stroke or death and a greater incidence of myocardial infarction and cranial neuropathy within 30 days after surgery, and was associated with a significantly lower incidence of any stroke or death during follow-up, or ipsilateral stroke after 30 days of operation. So the results of Meta-analysis support continued use of CEA as the standard method in treatment of carotid artery stenosis.
ObjectiveTo observe the effects of endovascular radiation (ER) on the proliferation and apoptosis of medial smooth muscle cells (SMC) and to discuss the possible mechanisms of radiation in the prevention of vascular restenosis (RS) in rabbits after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).MethodsForty rabbits undergoing CEA were randomly divided into four groups (each group=10) and given a radiation dose of 0, 10, 20 and 40 Gy 32P respectively. Rabbits were killed on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 28th and 56th day after operation. The specimens were collected and histopathologic examinations were done.ResultsProliferation apparently occurred in the intima and media of carotid the lumen became narrow in the control group on the 14 th, 28 th and 56 th day after operation. While in the radiation groups, proliferation was apparently suppressed and the lumen was much less narrowed (P＜0.05). The apoptosis rate of SMCs and PCNA positive cells increased on the 3rd day after operation and reached the peak on the 7th day. There was statistical difference between the ER groups and control group (P＜0.01). The effects were much more evident in 20 Gy and 40 Gy groups compared with 10 Gy group (P＜0.01).ConclusionER may prevent RS by suppressing SMC proliferation and migration as well as inducing SMC apoptosis. The effects are positively correlated with radiation doses. SMC proliferation and apoptosis occur in the early period after balloon injury, while hyperplasia of intima and medial happens later.
Objective To discuss the safety and validity of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients with severe right heart failure (RHF). Methods PEA procedures were performed on 36 patients in Fu Wai Hospital from January 2015 to April 2016. There were 28 males and 8 females, with a mean age of 46.56±11.85 years. According to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac function classification, 36 patients were divided into preoperative severe RHF group (grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ,n=28) and preoperative without severe RHF group (grade Ⅱ,n=8). Hemodynamic parameters before and after PEA were recorded and 3-18 months' follow-up was done. Results All the patients having PEA surgeries had an obvious decrease of mean pulmonary arterial pressure (from 49.53±13.14 mm Hg to 23.58±10.79 mm Hg) and pulmonary vascular resistance (from 788.46±354.60 dyn·s/cm5 to 352.89±363.49 dyn·s/cm5, bothP<0.001). There was no in-hospital mortality among all the patients. Persistent pulmonary hypertension occurred in 2 patients, perfused lung in 2 patients, pericardial effusion in 2 patients. No mortality was found during the follow-up period. All patients improved to NYHA grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ (WHO grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ), and only 2 patients remained in the NYHA grade Ⅲ (P<0.01). Conclusion The CTEPH patients having PEA surgeries had an obvious improvement in both their hemodynamics results and postoperative heart function, which in return could improve their quality of life.
周围静脉疾病是临床上的常见病和多发病，其发病率为20%～40%，皮肤营养障碍占2%～5%［1，２］ ,发病率比动脉疾病约高10倍，发病机理比动脉疾病复杂，分类方法亦不一致，至今存在着争论。下肢慢性静脉功能不全（chronic venous insufficiency,CVI）按其病因可分为原发性、继发性及先天性; 按解剖范围可分为浅、深和交通静脉3个系统，亦即包括浅静脉曲张、深静脉瓣膜功能不全、深静脉血栓形成后遗症、交通静脉瓣膜功能不全等［３，４］。多年来下肢浅静脉曲张主张施行大隐静脉高位结扎加剥脱术，但术后复发者较多。近年来，随着国内、外学者对CVI的深入研究，尤其是对深静脉瓣膜功能不全的认识，使传统下肢浅静脉曲张的概念发生了根本转变。下肢浅静脉曲张已不再被认为是一个独立的疾病，而是一种可由多种不同病因引起的共同临床表现……
ObjectiveTo summarize the experience in treating the elderly patients (≥75 years old) with carotid artery stenosis, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the carotid endarterectomy (CEA). MethodsThe datum of 312 cases with carotid artery stenosis and underwent the CEA in the vascular surgery department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from October 2009 to October 2012 were retrospectively analized.The risk factors of the CEA in treating the elderly patients were analized, and the measures to prevent perioperative complications were discussed. ResultsThirty-nine cases were brought into the research.The mean follow-up was (22.18±8.71) months.Thirty-three cases (84.6%) were male and 6 cases (15.4%) were female.The median age was 77 years old (75-82 years old).Eleven cases (28.2%) were with bilateral lesions, and 7 cases (17.9%) were asymptomatic.A total of 39 CEA procedures were successfully performed, 22 artificial vascular patches (56.4%) and 16 shunts (41.0%) were used.The mean average hospital stay was (17.38±5.39) days.One case showed cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome in 2th day after operation, another 1 case was found ipsilateral restenosis in 15th month after operation. ConclusionCEA is a safe and effective measure in treating the elderly patients with carotid artery stenosis, if the the indications of surgery is performed strictly.
Objective To compare the early compl ications of carotid stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Methods Between January 2005 and December 2007, 63 patients with carotid artery stenosis were treated with CEA in 36 cases (CEA group) and with CAS in 27 cases (CAS group). There were 42 males and 21 females with an average age of 67.5 years (range, 52-79 years). The locations were the left side in 28 cases and the rightside in 35 cases. The carotid stenosis was 60%-95% (mean, 79%). The major cl inical symptoms were stroke and transient ischemic attack. The cranial CT showed old cerebral infarction in 24 cases, lacunar infarction in 22 cases, and no obvious abnormal change in 17 cases. The encephalon, heart, and local compl ications were compared between 2 groups within 7 days after operation. Results In CEA group, encephalon compl ications occurred in 3 cases (8.3%), heart compl ications in 2 cases (5.6%), and local compl ications in 5 cases (13.9%); while in CAS group, encephalon compl ications occurred in 8 cases (29.6%), heart compl ications in 1 case (3.7%), and local compl ications in 3 cases (11.1%). The encephalon compl ication ratio of CAS group was significantly higher than that of CEA group (χ2=4.855, P=0.028); and there was no significant difference in other compl ications ratios between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion CEA is the first choice to treat carotid artery stenosis.
ObjectiveTo summarize the etiology and prevention measures of carotid artery pseudoaneurysms following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and discuss the complications and prognosis of it performed surgery and endovascular treatment. MethodsThe process and experience of diagnosis and treatment of two patients with carotid pseudoaneurysm following CEA admitted in this hospital from January 2000 to March 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The related English literatures concerning carotid artery pseudoaneurysm following CEA in PubMed, SpringerLink, ELSEVIER, and ScienceDirect database were searched and then made a conclusion. Results①The incidence of carotid artery pseudoaneurysms following CEA in this hospital was 0.31% (2/641). These two patients were treated with surgery and endovascular therapy respectively, and both recovered well after the treatment.②Thirty-nine related literatures totally were collected, including 187 patients with carotid artery pseudoaneurysm. One hundred and forty patients were treated with artificial patches during CEA, and 36 patients suffered secondary infection in the surgical sites. One hundred and fifty-two patients were treated with surgery, while 33 patients were treated with endovascular therapy, the residual two patients were accepted hybrid surgery. The overall incidence of cranial nerve injuries, the incidence of 30-day stroke, and the incidence of 30-day mortality were 6.4% (9/141), 7.4% (12/163), and 2.7% (5/182), respectively. ConclusionsSurgical site infection is one of the important reasons which lead to carotid artery pseudoaneurysm following CEA. Aneurysm resection and carotid artery reconstruction is still the main treatment of the carotid artery pseudoaneurysm; endovascular therapy could be used as a choice for a part of the patients. How to reduce the perioperative cranial nerve damage and the incidence of complications such as stroke still need further to be studied.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis, and to provide a more abundant evidence-based medicine for the treatment of CEA and CAS in patients with carotid artery stenosis. MethodsForty patients with carotid artery stenosis were randomly divided into CEA group and CAS group based on the operative indication. Patients in CEA group were given carotid endarterectomy treatment and those in CAS group were given carotid artery stenting treatment. Then clinical efficacy of the two groups were observed and compared. ResultsIn terms of the occurring rate of perioperative complications, cardiovascular events in 3 months after operation, and some major end events such as stroke, death and so on, the comparative difference between the two groups was of no statistical significance (P > 0.05). Through the followed-up visits of 12 months, the comparative difference between the two groups was also of no statistical significance (P > 0.05) in terms of the occurring rate of carotid artery restenosis and disabling or fatal stroke. ConclusionsFor patients with severe extracranial carotid stenosis under indication of operation treatment, carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are of equivalent clinical efficacy, and both of them are of high security, although further study with large-amount and evidence-based medical data in long term from multiple centers is still in need.
ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors of carotid endarterectomy.MethodThe literatures about carotid artery stenosis in the past 30 years were screened through literature retrieval, and the study of surgical risk factors related to carotid artery stenosis were reviewed.ResultsThere were many risk factors associated with the carotid endarterectomy, including demographic, underlying disease, surgical factors, perioperative management, and so on. However, the risk factors analysis were not comprehensive enough in the current study, so there was still lack of effective methods to predict the surgical risk of carotid artery stenosis.ConclusionTo fully understand the risk factors of carotid endarterectomy and to establish a multi-factor prediction model is the direction of further research.