【摘要】 目的 探讨经尿道超脉冲等离子体腔内逆行剜除汽化切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的有效性和安全性。 方法 2008年4月－2009年4月，应用Gyrus超脉冲等离子体行经尿道前列腺腔内逆行剜除汽化切除术124例，前列腺重量为（62.3±21.7） g。术中首先用电切镜鞘、电切环钝锐性相结合将前列腺增生腺体沿外科包膜逆行剥离、剜除，同时断血供，然后推至膀胱颈处后切除。统计手术时间、术中出血量及收集到的前列腺组织质量，术后留置尿管时间、住院时间、手术后前列腺特异性抗原（prostatic specific antigen，PSA）、残余尿量（post voiding residual volume，PVR）、最大尿流率（Qmax）、国际前列腺症状评分（international prostatic symptom scores，IPSS）及生活质量评分（quality of life，QOL）等指标的变化。 结果 124例手术顺利完成。手术时间（48.1±19.4） min，腺体组织质量（57.6±19.6） g，平均失血量（86.2±20.7） mL，仅1例需要输血，出血量和手术时间随前列腺体积和重量的增加而相应增加和延长。术后留置尿管时间（3.1±1.6） d，住院时间（5.8±1.4） d。随访6～18个月，所有患者术后1、6个月Qmax、PVR、IPSS、QOL均较术前得到改善，与术前比较差异均有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。术后6个月血清PSA降至（0.90±0.26） ng/mL，与术前比较差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。继发尿道外口狭窄3例，经尿道扩张治疗后恢复排尿通畅；继发尿失禁2例，经保守治疗分别于术后1～6个月恢复；无永久性尿失禁、再次手术止血患者，无手术死亡者，未发生经尿道前列腺电切综合征。 结论 经尿道超脉冲等离子体腔内逆行剜除汽化切除术治疗良性前列腺增生安全有效，值得临床推广使用。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of superpulse plasmakinetic body in transurethral intracavitary retrograde enucleation and vaporization resection of the prostate (TUEVRP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods Between April 2008 and April 2009, Gyrus TUEVRP was performed on 124 patients with obstructive BPH whose mean prostatic weight was (62.3±21.7) g. The hyperplasia prostate glands were retrogradely dissected and enucleated along surgical capsule to the bladder neck by sharp and blunt dissection combination of the resectoscope tip or loop. Simultaneously, the blood supply of the gland was clamped. The changes of such indexes as operating time, perioperative blood loss, collected prostatic specimen weight, postoperative catheterization time, hospitalization time, prostatic specific antigen (PSA), post voiding residual volume (PVR), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), international prostatic symptom score (IPSS), and quality of life (QOL) were assessed. Results All surgeries were successfully carried out with an average operation time of (48.1±19.4) minutes ranged from 25 to 175 minutes. The mean collected prostatic specimen weight was (57.6±19.6) g ranged from 20.2 to 125.7 g. The blood loss was ranged from 45 to 350 ml, averaging at (86.2±20.7) mL during the operation. Blood transfusion was needed in only one case. Blood loss and operation time were increased and prolonged in accordance with the increase of prostatic volume and weight. The postoperative catheterization time was ranged from 2 to 5 days, averaging at 3.1±1.6. The mean hospitalization time was (5.8±1.4) days ranged from 5 to 8 days. All patients were followed up for 6 to 18 months. Qmax, PVR, IPSS and QOL-score six months after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation (Plt;0.05). There were three cases of external urethral stricture, and they were treated with urethral dilatation successfully. Two cases of urinary incontinence recovered 1 and 6 months later, respectively, by traditional treatment. There were no cases of permanent urinary incontinence, reoperation for hemostasis, operative death, or transurethral resection syndrome. Conclusion TUEVRP is safe and clinically efficacious in the treatment of BPH, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
Objective To evaluate the safety of Rongbisu capsule used for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods A total of 218 patients (average age 63.73±7.50 years old) with phase Ⅰor Ⅱ benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated with oral Rongbisu capsule at a dose of 3 granules twice daily. The therapeutic course was 6 weeks and hepatic function was determined every 2 weeks. Results The median value of ALT in 218 patients rose significantly after the patients took Rongbishu capsule for 6 weeks (P=0.001 7). There were 17 patients whose ALT level rose from normal to abnormal, the incidence was 7.80%. There were 3 patients whose hepatic function was seriously impaired (ALT＞200 IU/L). Conclusions The essential component of Rongbishu capsule is edible tulip which has been recorded in the medical literature as being toxic. Airpotato yam of which the alias is also edible tulip is easily mistaken for edible tulip. Airpotato yam is the tuber of dioscorea bulbifera L. (family dioscoreaceae) which has confirmed hepatotoxcity. Our study result indicates that in order to insure the safety of Chinese crude drug, the origin of Chinese crude drug should be defined in the formulation according to the standard of Chinese drugs preparation. Pharmaceutical enterprises should strictly abide by the standards to identify the origin of Chinese crude drugs when approving the raw materials, especially for species which are poisonous and easily mistaken.
Objective To evaluate the correlation between hyperuricemia (HUA) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods A total of 666 elderly male patients, who had been admitted to the West China Hospital for routine physical examination in May, 2010, were included in this study. All the following indexes were collected: blood pressure, waistline, medical history, international prostatic symptom score (IPSS), serum uric acid (UA), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (PBG-2), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostate volume (PV) measured by ultrasound. Patients with higher level of UA more than 420 μmol/L were included into the HUA group (n=151) while the other patients with normal UA (NUA) were in the NUA group (n=515). Both the metabolic and prostate related indexes in the two groups were compared, and the correlation between HUA and each indexes were analyzed using logistic regression model. Results HUA was significantly associated with abdominal obesity (OR=1.575, 95%CI 1.059 to 2.340), hypertriglyceridemia (OR=2.78, 95%CI 1.877 to 4.118), metabolic syndrome (CDS2007) (OR=1.912, 95%CI 1.267 to 2.885), BPH (OR=1.464, 95%CI 1.465 to 1.635) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) rating (OR=1.782, 95%CI 1.173 to 1.522). Conclusion HUA is correlated with BPH, meanwhile it is highly accompanied with other risk factors of cardioascular diseases. Hereby, comprehensive medical screening should be considered when treating such patients.
ObjectivesTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1 470 nm laser vaporization vs. transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of 1 470 nm laser vaporization vs. TURP for BPH from inception to October 22nd, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 6 RCTs and 4 non-RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: 1 470 nm laser vaporization was superior to TURP in reducing intraoperative bleeding (MD=−103.87, 95%CI −148.08 to −59.65, P<0.000 01), hospital stay (MD=−3.82, 95%CI −4.35 to −3.28, P<0.000 01), postoperative indwelling catheter time (MD=−2.24, 95%CI −3.45 to −1.02, P=0.000 3), postoperative hemoglobin (MD=−1.63, 95%CI −3.14 to −0.12, P=0.03) and rate of secondary hemorrhage (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.48, P=0.002). There were no significant differences in operative time, bladder irrigation time, transient urinary incontinence and urethral stricture, IPSS Score and Qmax at 3 months after operation between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that 1 470 nm laser vaporization is superior to TURP in reducing intraoperative bleeding and secondary hemorrhage. It may be more suitable for prostate surgery in anticoagulant or coagulative dysfunction patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the association between 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) and risk of sexual dysfunction in subjects with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect studies on the association between 5ARIs and risk of sexual dysfunction in subjects with BPH from inception to October 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 12.0 software.ResultsA total of 15 studies involving 17 774 subjects were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with the placebo group, 5ARIs could significantly increase risk of erectile dysfunction (RR=1.52, 95%CI 1.36 to 1.69, P<0.000 1), while decrease libido (RR=1.79, 95%CI 1.37 to 2.32, P<0.000 1) and ejaculation disorder (RR=2.97, 95%CI 1.82 to 4.83, P<0.000 1) in subjects with BPH. Subgroup analysis of the type of 5ARIs, intervention period, publication year and sample size showed that the 5ARIs had a higher risk of sexual dysfunction than the placebo group.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that 5ARIs can increase risk of erectile dysfunction, decrease libido and ejaculation disorder in subjects with BPH. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
Objective To evaluate the correlation between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and metabolic syndrome (MS). Methods Total 666 elderly male patients admitted to West China Hospital for routine physical examination in May, 2010 were included in this study. The related laboratory tests of BPH and MS were taken. The correlation among BPH, lower urinary tract Symptoms (LUTS), prostate volume (PV), MS and its component diseases were analyzed. Results Hypertension was an important risk factor for BPH (OR=1.309, 95%CI 1.033 to 1.661), low HDL-C hyperlipidemia was a risk factor for IPSS scored over 7 points (OR=1.573, 95%CI 0.330 to 0.997), and the score of PV was positively correlated to obesity, hypertension, low HDL-C hyperlipidemia and MS (all Plt;0.05). Conclusion For the patient with BPH, MS and its component diseases mainly exert their effects on PV changes rather than LUTS.
目的 比较经尿道前列腺剜除术（TUEP）与经尿道前列腺电切术（TURP）的疗效。 方法 2010年11月－2011年3月，收治前列腺增生（BPH）患者58例，分别采用TUEP（30例）、TURP（28例）治疗。患者年龄55～87岁，平均73岁；病程1～12年，平均5年。术前常规行直肠指检前列腺光滑无结节；经直肠前列腺彩色超声多普勒检查，测得前列腺体积为50～80 mL，平均62 mL；血清前列腺特异性抗原＜10 ng/mL。 结果 TUEP组术中出血量、术后冲洗时间均短于TURP，切除前列腺组织体积大于TURP组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。术后拔除尿管后发生暂时性尿失禁TUEP组1例，TURP组发生2例，两组比较差异无统计学意义；两组均无永久性尿失禁发生。 结论 TUEP与TURP相比较，TUEP手术疗效好，出血少、恢复快，且并发症少。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).MethodsRandomized controlled trials of HoLEP versus PKEP in the treatment of BPH published between January 2000 and March 2021 were searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP database, and Wanfang database. Operative duration, estimated intraoperative blood loss, average duration of urinary catheterization, average duration of bladder irrigation, average length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were used as safety evaluation indicators. Postoperative International Prostatic Symptomatic Score (IPSS), postoperative maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postoperative quality of life (QoL), and postvoid residual (PVR) were used as effective evaluation indicators.ResultsA total of 14 randomized controlled trials were included in this study, with a total of 1 478 patients (744 in the HoLEP group and 734 in the PKEP group). The results of the meta-analysis showed that the intraoperative blood loss in the HoLEP group was less than that in the PKEP group [weighted mean difference (WMD)=−25.95 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) (−31.65, 20.25) mL, P=0.025], the average duration of urinary catheterization [WMD=−10.35 h, 95%CI (−18.25, −2.45) h, P=0.042], average duration of bladder irrigation [WMD=−10.28 h, 95%CI (−17.52, −3.04) h, P=0.038], and average length of hospital stay [WMD=−1.24 d, 95%CI (−1.85, −0.62) d, P=0.033] in the HoLEP group were shorter than those in the PKEP group, and the incidence of postoperative complications [risk ratio=0.70, 95%CI (0.56, 0.87), P=0.047] and 6-month postoperative Qmax [WMD=−0.89 m/s, 95%CI (−1.74, −0.05) m/s, P=0.037] in the HoLEP group were lower than those in the PKEP group. However, there was no significant difference in the operative duration, 3-month postoperative IPSS, 3-month postoperative Qmax, 3-month postoperative QoL, 3-month postoperative PVR, 6-month postoperative IPSS, 6-month postoperative QoL, or 6-month postoperative PVR between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsIn the treatment of BPH, the effectiveness of HoLEP does not differ from that of PKEP, but HoLEP is safer. The conclusions of this study need to be verified in more precisely designed and larger sample-sized multi-center randomized controlled trials.
ObjectivesTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic prostatectomy (TUPKP) versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of TUPKP and HoLEP for treatment of BPH from inception to January 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, the meta-analyses were performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 9 RCTs involving 784 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that, in efficacy outcomes, TUPKP was superior to HoLEP in Qmax at 48 months, and was inferior to HoLEP in PVR at 3 months, Qmax in 60 and 72 months, and IIEF-5 at 48 and 72 months. No significant association was found between two groups in Qmax from 1 to 36 months, IPSS from 1 to 72 months, prostate volume, PVR from 6 months, IIEF-5 from 1 to 24 months, QoL at 1 to 36 months, and resected prostate weight. As for safety, TUPKP was superior to HoLEP in operation time, while inferior to HoLEP in blood loss during procedure, hospital stay, catheterization period, bladder irrigation period, irrigation fluid, massive hemorrhage and hematuresis. No significant association was observed between two groups in serum sodium decrease, hemoglobin decrease, PSA, postoperative urine retention, blood transfusion, cystospasm, temporary incontinence, urinary tract infection, TURS, epididymitis, temporary difficulty in urination, urinary tract irritation syndrome, reoperation, retrograde ejaculation, urinary incontinence, ED and urethrostenosis.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy and safety of TUPKP and HoLEP for treatment of BPH are similar. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.