To help better understanding on evidence-based medicine, five frequently asked questions relevant to evidence-based clinical practice were commented on. The questions included: 1. Dose evidence-based medicine only emphasize evidence and ignore clinical experiences? 2. Dose evidence only include randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews? 3. How to face the quality of evidence? 4. Is randomized evidence suitable for treating individual patient? 5. Is evidence-based medicine useless since there is no adequate evidence for many clinical questions?
Objective To analyze the methodological quality of clinical practice guideline mentioned “evidence-based” in China. Methods We selected clinical guidelines developed based on evidence issued by the Chinese Medical Association in 2010-2012, and meanwhile, we conducted additional search for guidelines on clinical major diseases. Then, we selected literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and evaluated the included guidelines according to 8 items relevant to methodological rigor which were selected from the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). If the guidelines comply with the item, we recorded 1 point, otherwise 0 point. Results a) Among twenty-two included guidelines, 13 were originated and 9 were updated once every 3 to 5 years. b) Diseases covered stroke, diabetes, chronic hepatitis B, hypertension, pediatric nutrition, etc. c) The number of guideline references were 10 to 218, of which, nine guidelines cited 24 Cochrane systematic reviews (CDSRs), accounted for 2.62% (24/916). Among them, the acute ischemic stroke guideline cited the most (7 CDSRs). d) The number of experts involved in guidelines development was 2 to 95 and guidelines pages were 4 to 150. e) The guidelines’ quality generally scored 4 to 7, most of which described the process of guidelines development. The grades of recommendation were consistent with the levels of evidence. But most of the included guidelines did not clearly described literature research methods, peer reviewer, and update procedures. Conclusion There is a growing trend that clinical guidelines are developed based on evidence in China. However, the quality of reporting and the methodological rigor of guidelines need further improvement. The citation rates of Cochrane systematic reviews in these guidelines were relatively low. We suggest that guideline recommendations should be consistent with the levels of evidence and adapt to local conditions, and relevant support policies for guideline implementation in practice. In future, attention should be paid to the aspects of guideline development methods, reporting standard, guideline accessibility, and standard training for relevant personnel.
Objective To study the clinical characteristics of myotonic dystrophy. Method Patient records in West China Hospital, Sichuan University and China Biological Medicine Database (CBM-disc 1980-1999) were searched. Demographic data, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings of patients with myotonic dystrophy were analyzed. Results Of the total 97 patients, 64 cases were male, and 33 were female. Mean age was 28.5 years old. Ninety percent of patients had a family history. The frequency of symptoms in turn was myotonia (99%), muscle weakness (97%), muscle atrophy (85%), cataract (63%), hair losing or bald (57%) and gonadal atrophy (37%), sexuality disfunction (33%), heart damage (11%), intelligence impairment (11%), hypothyroid or disfunction of adrenal gland (8%), mental state disorders (8%). Conclusions In this group of patients, myotonia, muscle weakness and muscle atrophy were most common symptoms. In addition, some other systemic symptoms were common, such as cataract, hair losing, bald and gonadal atrophy. The clinical manifestations of myotonic dystrophy were complex.
The core idea of comparative effectiveness research (CER) refers to "study in the real-world" which can be considered as the extension of evidence-based medicine. So far CER has arouse wide concern. CER includes many intervention trials and observational studies, including systematic reviews/meta-analyses, effectiveness randomized controlled trials, and registry trials. Database is an important platform for CER. CER has better feasibility and can provide useful evidence for "real-world" decision-making. However, it also has limitations such as difficult control of confounding factors. It still needs to be further studied due to its immature methodological base. CER has been already applied in some neurological fields, with internationally-recommended research priorities for CER in neurology.
Objective To explore whether there is enough clinical evidence to confirm that stereotactic aspiration does more good than harm in patients with cerebral hemorrhage. Method A systematic review of all relevant clinical studies on stereotactic aspiration in the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage. Results Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 757 patients and 17 nonrandomized controlled studies including 1 766 patients, as well as 20 uncontrolled studies including 1 244 patients were identified . All studies reported positive results regarding the effects. However, the quality of the included studies were generally poor. The main problem was that most trials reported them as a RCT, but no description of the method of randomization. Conclusions Stereotactic aspiration in the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage is promising based on present evidence. However, at present, we can not draw definite conclusion whether the treatment does more good than harm compared with noninvasive medical treatment because of the poor quality of included studies. Therefore, more high quality RCTs are required.
Ischemic lesions, lacunar infarcts and leukoaraiosis on head CT or MRI are commonly detected in patients with non-specific symptoms such as dizziness and headache or people undergoing healthy physical examinations. Although these imaging findings are mostly related to vascular disease, especially cerebral small vessel disease, it does not mean that long-term use of antiplatelet drugs and statins are required. On the basis of literature review and clinical experiences, the article points out that the treatment methods for such manifestations include determining whether these lesions are vascular lesions, searching for risk factors or causes such as aging, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, vascular stenosis, and psychological factors, and taking strategies for the corresponding prevention and management, provides a reference for the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of these imaging manifestations in clinical practice.