Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, radicality, and short-term and mid-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision （TME） in comparison with open procedure for the middle-lower rectal cancer. Methods From October 2005 to October 2008， 52 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer received laparoscopic TME （Dixon’operation） without preventive stoma， while 46 patients underwent conventional open TME （Dixon’operation） without preventive stoma. The operative procedures, clinicopathological data， and short-term and mid-term outcomes were collected and compared between the two groups. Results The other patients were successful in both groups in addition to 2 （3.8%） patients were converted to open procedure in laparoscopic TME group. There was no perioperative death in both groups. The intraoperative blood loss, the time for bowel movement retrieval （first flatus）， and the incision healing in laparoscopic TME group were better than that in open TME group （P＜0.05）. No significant differences were observed between two groups in anastomotic leakage and pulmonary infection （P＞0.05）. Comparison of specimen, no significant differences were observed between two groups in negative distal margin and circumferential resection margin, number of lymph nodes resected, distance of distal resection margin to the tumor （P＞0.05）. No significant differences were observed between two groups in cancer-related death, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and 3-year survival rate （P＞0.05）. Conclusions Laparoscopic TME for middle-low rectal cancer is a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive technique, and can achieve satisfactory oncological outcome, which provides similar short-term and mid-term outcome compared with the traditional open procedure.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and short-term outcome of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for the middle-lower rectal cancer in municipal hospital.MethodsThe pathological data of 94 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer (49 cases underwent laparoscopic TME, while 45 cases received open TME), who treated in The First People’s Hospital of Ziyang from Jan. 2015 to Jun. 2017, were retrospectively collected and analyzed.ResultsTwo patients (4.1%) in laparoscopy group were converted to open surgery. Compared with the laparotomy group, the laparoscopic group had significantly less volume of intraoperative bleeding, shorter abdominal incision, earlier time to the first flatus and liquid diet, and lower rate of 30-day postoperative complication (P<0.05), but had longer operative time (P=0.033). While there were no significant difference on postoperative stay, the specimen length, distal margin, and number of harvested lymph nodes between the 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionLaparoscopic TME is a feasible, safe, and minimally invasive technique for middle-lower rectal cancer, and produce more favourable short-term outcome than open surgery in municipal hospital.
Objective To summarize the research progress of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer. Methods The literatures about current status, limitations, and prospects of TaTME in China and abroad were collected to make an reviewe. Results TaTME is conformed to the principle of total mesorectal excision (TME), by using the ‘bottom-up’ approach and assisting in the laparoscopic technique platform, to ensure an adequate oncological distal margin, and it could improve the quality of the mesorectum specimens, reduce the circumferential margin involvement rate, afford more precise autonomic nerve preservation rate, and increase sphincter preservation rate. But it is also facing new complications, oncological and functional outcomes problems. Conclusions Although the experience with TaTME remains limited, the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes are acceptable. Nevertheless, there is a need for multicenter, large sample size, and long-term follow-up clinical studies focusing on the long-term outcomes to further improve the oncological safety of TaTME, before widespread application can be recommended.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the postoperative anal function of rectal cancer patients treated with transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME), and to analyze the influencing factors which resulted in low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after taTME in this paper, so as to provide guidance for clinical practice.MethodsThe data about the patients with rectal cancer treated with taTME were collected at the Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from December 2018 to December 2019, including the clinical data and follow-up data. Postoperative recovery condition of the patients’ anal function and the affecting factors caused the occurrence of severe LARS after taTME were analyzed. The patients’ anal function within 1, 6, and 12 months after taTME were evaluated, and the evaluation tools were LARS scale and Wexner scale. The follow-up period was up to December 30, 2020.ResultsA total of 67 patients were completed preoperative and postoperative follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months. In terms of anal function, within 1 month after taTME was the worst period in which the anal function was the worst among all the points of time evaluated (1.49±0.33, 10.28±0.64, 6.42±0.60, and 3.73±0.61, respectively), and there was time trend during the follow-up period (F=66.101, P<0.001). In the first year after taTME, the patient’s anal function was in a state of continuous recovery, and the differences between the three points of time at 1, 6, and 12 months after taTME and preoperative anal function were statistically significant (P<0.010). The results of multivariate analysis indicated that the distance between the anastomotic stoma and the anal verge was independent risk factor affecting the postoperative anal function of the patients with taTME at 1 month and 6 months (P<0.010).ConclusionsWith time going, the postoperative anal function of the patients with taTME can be recovered to a certain extent. The distance between the anastomotic stoma and the anal verge was the independent factor affecting the postoperative function of the rectal cancer patients received taTME.
目的 探讨全直肠系膜切除术（total mesorectal excision,TME）在治疗中低位直肠癌中的技术操作与效果。方法 对47例应用TME技术治疗的中低位直肠癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 27例行低位前切除术，20例行腹会阴联合切除术（Miles术），全部病例均顺利完成手术并出院，平均出血量250 ml； 术后发生吻合口漏2例； 术后随访0.5～3年，局部复发5例，因肝转移死亡2例。结论 应用TME技术治疗中低位直肠癌有其适应证，术中须遵循其操作规范，同时应注意采取适当的措施预防吻合口漏。
Objective To introduce the total mesorectal excision (TME)under the laparoscope and with the ultrosonic scalpel. Methods Under the laparoscope and with the ultrosonic scalpel, total mesorectal excision in 3 patients was performed. In operation, alone the parietal layer of pelvic fascia and inside the automatic nerve trunk, the mesorectum was excised with the ultrasonic scalpel. Results Three patients got final recovery, no damage to the viscera in operation occurred. Average hemorrhage amount was about 100ml. Intestinal function recovered within 24 hours, average in hospital time was 10.3 days. After 4 months, 3 patients got good living quality without recurrence and metastasis.Conclusion TME under the laparoscope is a new progress of less damageable operation. Compared with the traditional open laparotomy,it has some advantage. But it requires high technology and expensive equipments, and the case is still very limited in use.
Objective To observe the expressions of P53 and CD34 in rectal cancer and distal mucosa and to explore the safe distal margin of radical surgery for rectal cancer at molecular pathologic level. Methods Forty-five cases of rectal cancer were marked before operation， and then the cases were detected by PET/CT. P53 and CD34 expressions in rectal tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry technique. Results P53 expression and microvessel density (MVD) in rectal cancer were significantly higher than those in distal mucosa， which in distal mucosa were decreased along the anal direction. P53 and CD34 were still found in the normal rectal tissue. P53 expression and MVD were not significantly different between in more than 1.5 cm distal rectal mucosa and in normal rectal tissue. Besides MVD was related to size of tumor in rectal cancer and distal 0.5 cm rectal mucosa tissue, P53 and CD34 in rectal cancer and distal mucosa rectal tissue were not associated with tumor diameter, stage and differentiation of rectal cancer. Conclusion From the molecular pathologic view, the resection of 2.0 cm rectal distal tissue should be safe for excision of rectal cancer.
Objective To prospectively evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) with anal sphincter preservation (ASP) for low rectal cancers. Methods From June 2001 to March 2004, 125 patients undergoing LTME and 103 patients undergoing OTME were included in this study. The international standard questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38) were used to evaluate the conditions of patients at 3 periods after surgery respetively: 3-6 months, 12-18 months, gt;24 months. Results In contrast to OTME patients, the LTME ones showed significantly better physical function during 3-6 months after surgery, less micturition problems within 12-18 months, less male sexual problems and better sexual function during 12-18 months after surgery, with better sexual enjoyment after postoperative 24 months. Both groups showed significant improvement in most subscales from the first to the second assessment, and improvement in sexual enjoyment from the second to the third assessment. The sexual function, micturition problems and male sexual problems in LTME group significantly improved from the first to the second assessment, whereas the sexual function in OTME group improved from the second to the third assessment.Conclusion Patients undergoing LTME for low rectal cancers have bette postoperative HRQOL than patients undergoing OTME, with better physical function, micturition function, overall sexual and male sexual functions in short term, and better sexual enjoyment in the long term. The HRQOL of both LTME and OTME patients may be expected to improve over time, particularly in the first postoperative year.
ObjectiveTo investigate the progress and controversy of membrane anatomy theory in laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer. MethodThe literature related to membrane anatomy theory in recent years was reviewed and summarized. ResultsThe membrane anatomy theory not only improved the effect of total mesorectal excision, ensured the integrity of the mesorectum, more standardized the operation and principles of rectal cancer surgery, but also provided the operator with a broad vision and clear anatomical hierarchy. The theory of membrane anatomy had important clinical significance for tumor radical resection, organ resection and functional protection. However, this theory had not been unified, and the establishment of membrane plane and the choice of surgical plane were still needed to be studied and explored. ConclusionAt present, scholars at home still regard the theory of membrane anatomy as the theoretical support and reference basis for the endoscopic treatment of mid-low rectal cancer, which can provide surgeons with new treatment prospects and research direction, and improve the survival expectancy and quality of life of patients with intestinal cancer in the future.