Objective To investigate the risk factors of liver metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer of Ⅱ–Ⅲ stage after preoperative short course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy. MethodsThe clinical data of 89 patients with middle and low rectal cancer of Ⅱ–Ⅲ stage admitted to the Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University from January 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy before operation. The risk factors of postoperative liver metastasis were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. ResultsThe 89 patients were followed up for 7–53 months, with a median follow-up time of 33 months. During the follow-up period, 25 patients developed liver metastasis, the onset time was 7–35 months, and the median time of liver metastasis was 17 months. Among them, 5 patients (5.6%) developed liver metastasis in the first year after surgery, 15 patients (16.8%) developed liver metastasis at the second year after surgery, 5 patients (5.6%) developed liver metastasis at the 3rd year after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression results showed that lymph node metastasis [OR=3.550, 95%CI (1.425, 8.953), P=0.041], vascular invasion [OR=3.335, 95%CI (1.011, 11.001), P=0.048], maximum tumor diameter ≥5 cm [OR=4.477, 95%CI (1.273, 15.743), P=0.019], and peri-tumor diameter ≥1/2 [OR=4.633, 95%CI (1.387, 15.475), P=0.013] were risk factors for liver metastasis. ConclusionsLymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, maximum tumor diameter ≥5 cm, and circumferential tumor diameter ≥1/2 are risk factors for liver metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer of Ⅱ–Ⅲ stage after preoperative short course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy.
Objective To approach the curative effect of laparoscopic rectum resection combined with per anus intersphincteric rectal dissection and colo anal anastomosis for patients with ultra-low rectal cancer. Methods Thirteen patients were prospectively studied from June 2005 to December 2007. There were 8 male and 5 female patients, with a mean age of 53 (range, 41-69) years. All the tumors located less than 5 cm above the anal verge. All the patients were treated with general anaesthesia and then went through the following procedures: lied the reverse Trendelenburg reforming lithotomy position, the laparoscope went inside the abdomen through two apertures, the hylus aperture (observing aperture) and the McBurney point aperture (main performing aperture). After the resection through the laparoscope, the operation was translocated to the perineal region, the anus was enlarged to expose the operation area. Results The operation on all cases succeeded, there was no operative mortality, and no stomal leak in all patients. The follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 30 months (mean 17 months). Up to now, one patient developed recurrence in pelvic cavity, and one suffered hepatic metastasis, there was no port-site implantation metastasis， 9 patients had satisfactory functional recovery of anus in the sixth month after operation. Conclusion The therapy laparoscopic rectum resection combined with per anus intersphincteric rectal dissection and colo-anal anastomosis for patients with ultra-low rectal cancer is a safe, minimally invasive, anal-preserving technique with reliablity in curative effect and satisfaction in anal sphincter function.
目的 探讨CT仿真内镜（CT virtual endoscopy，CTVE）在低位直肠癌术前分期中的价值。方法 收集我院2008年8月1日至2011年3月1日期间的直肠癌患者57例，术前行直肠CTVE检查，详细记录患者直肠癌周围组织浸润和淋巴结转移的情况；患者术后常规进行病理检查，比较两者结果的差异。结果 术前直肠CTVE检查与术后石蜡病理检查对直肠癌周围淋巴结转移的判断经四格表χ2检验，差异无统计学意义（χ2=2.5，P＞0.05），其对直肠癌周围淋巴结转移预测的敏感性为66.67%，特异性为93.94%。术前直肠CTVE预测直肠癌周围组织浸润和术后病理检查结果经四格表χ2检验，差异有统计学意义（χ2=4.4，P＜0.05），其对直肠癌周围组织浸润判断的敏感性为27.78%，特异性为42.86%。结论 CTVE在术前评估直肠癌周围淋巴结转移有较高的可信性，但对直肠癌周围组织浸润的评价较差。
目的总结低位直肠癌采用柱状经腹会阴切除术（APR）的应用体会。 方法徐州医学院附属医院普通外科于2010年1月至2013年7月期间采用柱状APR治疗22例低位直肠癌患者（柱状APR组），并与同期行传统APR治疗的35例患者（传统APR组）进行对比，分析术中、术后和随访的各项指标。 结果与传统APR组比较，柱状APR组的环周切缘阳性率及术中穿孔率明显降低〔4.55%（1/22）比34.29%（12/35）和4.55%（1/22）比31.43%（11/35）〕，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；2组手术时间、术中出血量、并发症发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术后随访3～30个月（平均21个月），柱状APR组无肿瘤复发及远处转移患者，未见死亡病例；传统APR组出现盆底局部复发4例，远处转移3例，死亡2例。2组局部复发、远处转移及死亡率比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。 结论柱状APR可以切除更多的肿瘤周围组织，降低环周切缘阳性率，减少术中肠穿孔的发生，降低局部复发。
Objective To evaluate short-term effect of laparoscopic and open Miles operations for lower rectal carcinoma. Methods A total of 119 patients with lower rectal carcinoma were retrospectively collected from March 2012 to March 2017 in this hospital, among which 65 were in the laparoscopic operation group and 54 in the open operation group. The perioperative data, pathological results, recovery courses, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the open operation group, the laparoscopic group showed a longer operation time (t=6.035, P=0.002), quicker bowel function recovery (t=4.919, P<0.001), faster off-bed activity (t=2.221, P<0.001), and shorter hospital stay time (t=3.795, P=0.025). The intraoperative blood loss (t=0.154, P=0.698) and the number of harvested lymph nodes (t=0.532, P=0.595) were similar between the two groups. The laparoscopic operation group showed a significant lower total complication rate (χ2=7.174, P=0.009) as compared with the open operation group, but the incision infection, urinary tract injury, lung infection, thrombosis of lower extremities, etc. had no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.050). Conclusion Laparoscopic Miles operation improves postoperative recovery and reduces postoperative complications as compared with open approach in treatment of lower rectal cancer, with similar oncological and short-term results.
ObjectiveTo analyze the common reasons of anastomotic leakage following sphincter preservation for rectal cancer, and to explore the better prevention and treatment strategies. MethodThe related literatures of the definition, common causes, and prevention and treatment status of anastomotic leakage were reviewed. ResultsCurrently rectal cancer was one of common malignant tumors, including about 2/3 low rectal cancer.Recently, sphincter preserving surgery had become the preferred surgical procedure.However, the incidence of anastomotic leakage keeping in higher was still the most serious and common complications.Through improving the general condition of the patients, improving surgical techniques, and standardized treatment could effectively reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage. ConclusionReasonable preoperative assessment for the basic situation of patients with rectal cancer, standardized and individualized treatments, contribute to reduce incidence of anastomotic leakage and improve clinical outcomes in patients with low rectal cancer.
ObjectiveTo analyze the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with stapled colo-anal anastomosis under direct vision for low rectal cancer. MethodsFrom January 2001 to March 2012, 138 patients were underwent intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer, 45 cases of whom were received laparoscopic surgery and stapled colo-anal anastomosis (SCAA group), and the other 93 cases (55 open and 38 laparoscopic) of whom were received hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis (HCAA group). The morbidity comparison only involed the data of relevant to the anastomosis. The anus functional outcomes, including those from the Saito function questionnaire and Wexner score, were compared and only involved the data of relevant to the laparoscope. Results①The anastomotic complications rates were similar for the fistula, bleeding, and rectal mucosal prolapse (P > 0.05); the rate of anastomosis leakage and the degree of anastomotic stricture in the SCAA group were significantly lower (or milder) than those in the HCAA group (P=0.001 and P=0.022, respectively).②As for the functional results, the incidence of dyschesia in the SCAA group was significantly lower than that in the HCAA group (P=0.016), and the other 7 items of Saito function questionnaire and Wexner score were similar between these two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionsCompared with traditional intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery with stapled colo-anal anastomosis could reduce the morbidity and the anus function is non-inferior to the former.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of fecal drainage technique on rectal anastomosis for preventing anastomotic leakage after operation for middle-low rectal cancer.MethodsThe retrospective analysis was used to collect the middle-low rectal cancer which completed operation in this hospital from 2014 to 2019. According to the way of preventing annstomotic leakage, the patients were divided into two groups: fecal drainage on rectal anastomosis group (Abbreviation: fecal drainage group) and end ileum prophylactic stoma group (Abbreviation: ileostomy group). The incidence of anastomotic leakage after operation and the different treatment methods following leakage were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 231 cases were recorded, including 84 cases in the fecal drainage group, 147 cases in the ileostomy group. There were no significant differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, preoperative complications, operation mode, etc. between the two groups (P>0.050). There were no significant differences in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision infection, postoperative intestinal obstruction, total hospitalization cost, death, anastomotic leakage (overall, each grade, treatment, and outcome) between the two groups (P>0.050). Although the length of hospital stay except the patients with anastomotic leakage in the fecal drainage group was significantly longer than that in the ileostomy group (P<0.001), there was no significant difference in the total length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.050), and the incidence of anastomotic stenosis in the fecal drainage group was significantly lower than that in the ileostomy group (P=0.029).ConclusionAccording to the results of this study, fecal drainage technique on rectal anastomosis is effective, safe, and feasible in preventing anastomotic leakage after operation for middle-low rectal cancer.