Objective To evaluate the clinical valueof the revision of total hip replacement(THR), to analyse the reason of the rev isions, and to discuss the main difficulties and measures to manage it.Methods From June 1998 to January 2002, 15 cases (15 hips) were revised on totalhip replacement. The reasons for revision in the cases were as follows:failure of primary operative techenique, loosening and sinking of the components, displacement of the prosthesis, erosion of the acetabulum, as well as fracture of the femoral stem. The main difficulties of the revision were:poor health condition of the patients; the remove of the prosthesis of the primary THR,especially the broken femoral stem and the cements; the loss of localbone. The measures to remove the broken femoral stem were described.ResultsAll cases were followed up 2.4 years on average: 2 patients died from heart disease and cerebrovascular disease respectively, while the good results were achieved in the others.No infection, dislocation, loosening, and other complications occurred. The good effects were related with following factors:mild degree of illness; no severe bone defect; most of the first femoral head replacement.Conclusion The revision of THRis a more difficult operation, so that the special instrument and equipment andoperative experience are required.
From 1972 to 1990,121 cases of bone tumor were treated by segmental resection of tumor and followed by artifical joint re- placement. All of the prostheses were designed and manufactured by our hospital. One hundred and two cases were followed up for an average of 7.4 years and the curative rate with the affected limbs preserved was 85.28%. The indication, the advantages and disadvantages, the material and the type of artifical joints, and the assessment of functional reconstruction following operation were discussed.
Abstract The fracture of the prosthetic stem after prosthetic replacement of femoral head is not rare. In this study, the photoeastic instrument was used to study the stress distribution on the prosthetic stem following its insertion and to analyse the factors influencing the fracture of the stem. Through the examination of 9 places in 8 cases, it was found that:(1) The removal of femoral calcar and the inframedullary filling of the bone cement directly influenced the stress distribution. (2) The valgus or varus condition of the prosthesis would lead to stress concentration on the stem. (3) Once lossening of the prosthesis occured it would change the preliminary installingstress distribution in the upper femur which would lead to fatigue fracture. Ths experimental data and clinical observation would provide scientific basis forthe prevention of fracture of prosthetic stem following prosthetic replacement of femoral head.
ObjectiveTo report the preliminary clinical results and analyze the prognostic factors of prosthetic failures with non-cemented modular prosthetic reconstruction after tumor resection in lower extremities.MethodsA clinical data of 150 patients with lower extremity tumors treated with MEGASYSTEM-C non-cemented modular prosthetic reconstruction between October 2011 and September 2016 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 88 males and 62 females, aged from 12 to 81 years, with a median age of 24 years. According to World Health Organization (WHO) classification of bone tumors, 120 cases were primary malignant tumors, 27 cases were intermediate tumors, and 3 cases were metastatic tumors. Among them, 134 cases underwent primary operation and 16 cases underwent reoperation after recurrence. Eighty-seven patients with malignant tumors received chemotherapy before and after operation, and no patient received local radiotherapy during perioperative period. Proximal femur was reconstructed in 32 cases, distal femur in 83 cases, and proximal tibia in 35 cases. The postoperative follow-up time, the results of oncology (survival status and tumor recurrence), and prosthesis failure (prosthesis survival rate, reasons for failure, treatment plan after failure) were recorded. The reason of the prosthesis failure was classified into 5 types according to the classification defined by Henderson et al. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-Rank test were used to analyze patient and prosthesis survival. Lower extremity function was assessed by using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system and MSTS scores were compared for patients with different reconstruction sites.ResultsAll patients were followed up 5-84 months, the median follow-up time was 39 months. During the follow-up period, there were 116 cases of tumor-free survival, 10 cases of tumor-bearing survival, and 24 died of lung metastasis or multiple metastases. The 3-year and 5-year survival rates of 120 patients with primary malignant tumors were 83.1% and 76.6%. There was no significant difference in survival rate between different reconstruction sites (P=0.851). Seven cases (4.7%) had local recurrence at 7-21 months after operation. The 3-year and 5-year survival rates of the prosthesis in 150 patients were 94.4% and 92.5%. There was no significant difference in survival rate between different reconstruction sites (P=0.765). There were 26 failures in 24 patients (16.0%) during the follow-up period. There were 9 cases of type 1 failure, 1 case of type 2 failure, 3 cases of type 3 failure, 5 cases of type 4 failure, and 8 cases of type 5 failure. At last follow-up, 120 of the 126 patients survived without prosthetic failure. Except that the influence of different parts of prosthesis on the incidence of type 4 failure (P=0.029), the influence of chemotherapy on the incidence of type 5 failure (P=0.002) were significant, the influence of other types of failure on different reconstructed parts of prosthesis, initial operation, and perioperative chemotherapy had no significant difference (P>0.05). There were 5 cases of amputation (4 cases of type 5 failure, 1 case of type 4 failure), 3 cases of prosthesis removal (1 case of type 2 failure, 1 case of type 3 failure, 1 case of type 4 failure), 3 cases of revision while keeping the original prosthesis (2 cases of type 1 failure, 1 case of type 5 failure). The overall MSTS score was 24±3. The MSTS scores were 24±3, 25±3, and 23±3 in patients whose reconstruction sites located in proximal femur, distal femur, and proximal tibia, respectively, showing no significant difference (F=3.014, P=0.052).ConclusionThe short-term follow-up showed a lower incidence of complications and good function for MEGASYSTEM-C non-cement modular prosthesis system in treatment of bone defects after lower limb tumor resection. The main factors affecting the early survival of prosthesis were tumor progression and infection.
目的:观察高龄不稳定型粗隆间骨折人工关节置换术的治疗效果。方法:2005年1月至2008年1月收治高龄不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者56例,行人工关节置换术治疗,按照Harris标准评分分析效果。结果:56例患者均顺利完成手术,平均手术时间62 min,平均住院17天。随访1～3年,术后14月因突发脑出血死亡1例,其余患者功能恢复良好。按照Harris标准评分优良率为91%。结论:高龄股骨粗隆间骨折采用人工关节置换术治疗安全有效。
Objective To evaluate the selection of the type of prosthesis in revision hip arthroplasty. Methods There were 33 hips in our study,male in 7 hips and female in 26 hips.The average age of the patients were 59 years.The reasons ofthe revision included aseptic loosing in 22 hips, infection in 8 hips(2 infection hips with discharging sinuses),and acetabular erosion in 3 hips.The operationsfor revision were 13 cemented and 12 cementless acetabular prosthesis with autograft inmorselized form;the femoral revision were all selected in cemented prosthesis.The revision for infection hip were all cemented prosthesis of extensively porouse-coated. Results The average follow-up duartion was 3.9 years and 11 months.There was a radiolucency but no clinical instability accompanied in 2 hips and remaining moderate pain in4 hips.No dislocation and fracture were seen in the series.Harris score were improved to 82.4(68.88). Conclusion The commonest reason of revision hip arthroplasty was aseptic loosing.The acetabular prosthesis in revision could select cemented or cementless components and femoral prosthesis could select extensively coated stem.The cemented components could yield good results in infection hips revision.
Objective To evaluate the clinical results of cementless total hip replacement (THR) in treating osteoarthritis and identifying the factors affecting the results. Methods From January 1995 to December 1999, 76 patients(85 hips) with osteoarthritis of hip joint were treated. These patients were assessed according to Harris hip score and X-ray film. The average follow-up time was 49.3 months. Results The average Harris score in the patients was 90.9 points. The excellent or good rate was 91.9%(75/85). Pain in the thigh existed in 23 hips (27.5%). The femoral osteolysis occurred in 14 hips(16.5%). The radiographical result demonstrated femoral loosening in 2 hips. harris score became lower when the femoral component of osteoarthritis of hip jointl. Pain in the thigh may be related to the varus placement of femoral component and femoral osteolysis. Femorla osteolysis is one of important factors affectin the long-term outcomes.
Objective To summarize the clinical outcome of the Ribbed anatomic cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the treatment of hip-joint disease. Methods From January 2001 to June 2005, 34 patients(38 hips) with hip-joint disease were treated with Ribbed anatomic cementless THA. Their ages ranged from 29 to 55 years with an average age of 42.7 years.The disease course was from 3 to 18 years. Among these cases, there were 7 cases (7 hips) of femoral neck fracture, 5 cases(5 hips) of traumatic arthritis after fracture of acetabulum, 15 cases(16 hips) of necrosis of the femoral head and 7 cases(10 hips) of ankylosing spondylitis. Four patients were operated on both hip joints. The average Harris hip score was 38.6(25-57) before operation. Results Twenty-one patients(23 hips) were followed up 861 months with an average of 35 months. The Harris hip score was 76-98 after operation with an average of 92.3, showing significant difference when compared with that before operation(Plt;0.05). The excellent and good result was achieved in 93.5 % of patients. Radiographs showed no prosthetic osteolysis and no evidence of loosening. Pain in the thigh occurred in 4 patients,and it can be relieved by using nonsteroid antiinflammatory drug. Conclusion Ribbed anatomic cementless THA has good clinical and radiographic results in treating patients with hip-joint disease.
Objective To investigate the short-term effectiveness of Swanson artificial joint replacement in treating post-traumatic metacarpophalangeal joint stiffness. Methods Between August 2007 and May 2010, 11 cases (13 fingers) of metacarpophalangeal joint stiffness with soft tissue defects underwent Swanson artificial joint replacement. There were 7 males (9 fingers) and 4 females (4 fingers), aged 43 to 65 years with an average of 49 years. The involved fingers included 4 thumbs, 4 index fingers, 3 middle fingers, and 2 ring fingers. The types of injury included open and crush injury in 8 fingers, fracture of the metacarpophalangeal joint in 3 fingers, metacarpophalangeal joint severing in 2 fingers. The time from joint stiffness to hospitalization was 12 to 48 weeks (mean, 24 weeks). The joint activity was (136.82 ± 28.96)°. According to total active motion (TAM) assessment, included good in 1 finger, fair in 6 fingers, and poor in 6 fingers before operation. The activities of daily living were assessed by Sollerman score, which was 45.64 ± 11.04. The X-ray films and CT scan showed traumatic arthritis of the metacarpophalangeal joint. Results The incision healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12 to 34 months (mean, 24.1 months). At last follow-up, the joint activity was (194.64 ± 28.86)°, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative value (t=25.214, P=0.000). According to TAM assessment, including excellent in 1 finger, good in 4 fingers, fair in 7 fingers, and poor in 1 finger. The Sollerman score was 67.45 ± 8.20 postoperatively, showing significant difference when compared with the preoperative score (t=10.470, P=0.000). X-ray examination showed no prosthesis fracture, periprosthetic fracture, or joint dislocation occurred at last follow-up. Conclusion Swanson artificial joint replacement can be appl ied to treat posttraumatic metacarpophalangeal joint stiffness, which can improve the joint activity and has satisfactory short-term effectiveness.