With the development of radiologic intervention, the treatments of aortic dissection are getting more and more diversified. In recent years, Debakey Ⅲ and DebakeyⅠaortic dissection has been usually treated with endovascular graft exclusion, or combined surgical and endovascular treatment. It is therefore more important to evaluate the aorta and its complications after interventional treatments. Because multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) has advantages, such as short examination time, high spatial resolution, and simple operation, this modality has become a first choice of non-invasive methods for the follow-up of aortic diseases after the intervention. Now the MDCT presentations and their anatomic-pathologic features of aortic dissection after endovascular graft exclusion or combined surgical and endovascular treatment are reviewed in this article.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of in vitro fenestration on reconstruction of left subclavian artery in endovascular treatment of aortic dissection.MethodsA total of 89 patients with aortic dissection involving left subclavian artery were treated by endovascular treatment in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from February 2017 to January 2020. There were 44 patients in the test group, including 36 males and 8 females, with an average age of 58.02±13.58 years. There were 45 patients in the control group, including 35 males and 10 females, with an average age of 54.10±12.32 years. The left subclavian artery was reconstructed by in vitro fenestration in the test group and by chimney technique in the control group. The clinical data were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe operation time of the test group was longer than that of the control group (126.16±7.53 min vs. 96.49±6.52 min, P<0.01). The median follow-up time was 31 (13-48) months. The incidence of endoleak in the test group (4.7%) was lower than that in the control group (18.6%, P=0.04) during the follow-up. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, false lumen thrombosis, retrograde aortic dissection or left subclavian artery occlusion between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion In vitro fenestration for reconstructing left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic dissection is safe and feasible, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
Objective To analyze the risk factors and prognosis of acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) early after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair, and develop the Nomogram prediction model of AGI. Methods The patients who underwent ATAAD cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in our hospital from 2016 to 2021 were collected and divided into an AGI group and a non-AGI group. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. A Nomogram prediction model was established by using R language. Results A total of 188 patients were enrolled, including 166 males and 22 females, aged 22-70 (49.70±9.96) years. Through multivariate logistic regression analysis, the aortic dissection (AD) risk score, poor perfusion of superior mesenteric artery (SMA), duration of aortic occlusion and intraoperative infusion of red blood cells were the predictors for AGI (P<0.05). There were statistical differences in the ventilator-assisted duration, ICU stay time, liver dysfunction, renal insufficiency, parenteral nutrition, nosocomial infection and death within 30 days after the operation between the two groups (P<0.05). The Nomogram prediction model was established by using the prediction factors, and the C index was 0.888. Through internal verification, the C index was 0.848. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the discrimination of the model, and the area under the curve was 0.888. Conclusion The AD risk score after ATAAD, poor perfusion of SMA, duration of aortic occlusion and intraoperative infusion of red blood cells are independent predictors for AGI. The Nomogram model has good prediction ability.
During the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been controversy over whether emergency surgical management should be performed or not in the patients with COVID-19. Stanford type A aortic dissection is a very urgent life-threatening disease, and guidelines recommend surgical treatment for patients with type A aortic dissection in the first instance. However, intraoperative extracorporeal circulation can be fatal to patients recovering from COVID-19. During the pandemic, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has played an important role in supporting COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure. This article reports a successful V-V ECMO treatment for a Stanford type A aortic dissection patient, who suffered respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 after emergency surgery.
目的:探讨主动脉夹层患者误诊的原因,提高主动脉夹层患者的早期诊断率,为及时、正确救治患者生命提供有力的科学依据。方法:回顾性分析3例主动脉夹层患者实际诊断与误诊的情况,查明误诊原因。结果:3例主动脉夹层患者经检查后证实,1例误诊为急性食道撕裂伤或消化性溃疡,占33.33%;1例误诊为急腹症,占33.33%;1例误诊为急性颅内病变,占33.33%。结论积极评估其病情的危险程度,监测生命体征,快速建立静脉通道,同时仔细询问相关病史,认真查体,积极采取相应辅助检查,可降低误诊率。
ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical outcomes of Cabrol procedure for the treatment of Stanford type A aortic dissection. MethodsClinical data of 37 patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent Cabrol procedure at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute from January 2009 to April 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 34 males and 3 females aged at 21 to 66 years. The average interval time from onset to getting operation was 15.2±28.5 days. All patients received Cabrol procedure was performed for aortic root. According to different aortic arch conditions, hemiarch replacement or total arch replacement combined endovascular aortic repair with stent were performed. ResultsAll the operations were successfully performed including isolated Cabrol procedure in 4 patients, right hemiarch replacement in 10 patients and total arch replacement combined endovascular aortic repair with stent in 23 patients. One patient (2.7%) underwent reexploration for postoperative bleeding. Postoperative mortality was 10.8% (4/37). Follow-up duration was 1-24 months, 2 patients died during follow-up. ConclusionCabrol procedure has satisfactory clinical outcomes for Stanford type A AD and long-term patency of aortic without coronary oppression.
【摘要】 目的 研究急性主动脉夹层时间分布规律。 方法 回顾性研究我院2000年1月-2010年12月所有急性主动脉夹层患者的时间资料，分析其月份、季节、周以及时刻分布特点。 结果 急性主动脉夹层月份分布高峰点为1月4日，高峰段为9月21日～次年4月19日（Plt;0.05）；季节分布以冬春季较多（Plt;0.05）；周分布无高峰点及高峰段（Pgt;0.05）；时刻分布高峰点为上午10点及下午4点。 结论 急性主动脉夹层具有明显的时间分布规律，我们应该在该病的高峰时间更加重视其发生的可能，从而减少误诊，改善预后。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the features of time distribution in the occurrence of acute aortic dissection (AAD). Methods We retrospectively analyzed all the databases of AAD in our hospital between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010, and studied the monthly, seasonal, weekly, and circadian distribution of the cases. Results In terms of monthly distribution, the occurrence of AAD peaked at January 4th with the high frequency in the period of September 21st to April 19th of the next year (Plt;0.05). According to the seasonal distribution, the occurrence of AAD peaked in winter and spring (Plt;0.05). There was no peak time in weekly distribution (Pgt;0.05). In accordance with circadian distribution, the occurrence of AAD peaked at 10 and 16 o’clock (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Because of the obvious rhythm of time distribution of AAD, We can pay more attention to the diagnosis of AAD especially in the peak time, thus reducing the mistakes in diagnosis and improving the prognosis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of in situ fenestration combined with chimney technique in the treatment of aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery.MethodsFrom January 2012 to June 2019, 53 patients with aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery were selected. There were 21 patients in the test group, including 14 males and 7 females, with an average age of 57.2±11.2 years; there were 32 patients in the control group, including 20 males and 12 females, with an average age of 56.7±12.1 years. In the test group, the left subclavian branch was reconstructed by in situ fenestration and the left common carotid artery was reconstructed by chimney technique. In the control group, the left common carotid artery was reconstructed by hybrid operation. The clinical data of the patients were compared.ResultsThe operation time of the test group was significantly longer than that of the control group (151.8±35.2 min vs. 101.3±29.6 min, P=0.00). The patients in the two groups were followed up for 6-20 months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of pulmonary infection, stroke, steal blood syndrome, false lumen thrombosis or internal leakage between the two groups (P>0.05). The diameters of the distal and proximal ends of the true cavity in the test group increased significantly compared with those in the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionIn situ fenestration combined with chimney technique is an effective method for the treatment of aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic strategies of endovascular repair for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection. MethodThe clinical data of 36 patients with complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection treated by endovascular repair were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThirty-six patients with complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection were treated successfully by endovascular repair. Twenty-two cases were treated by endovascular repair combined with covering left subclavian artery (LSA). Ten cases were treated by endovascular repair combined with chimney technique. Two cases were treated by endovascular repair combined with vascular prosthesis bypass from left common carotid artery to LSA. Two cases were treated by endovascular repair combined with vascular prosthesis bypass from right common carotid artery to left common carotid artery, whose proximal part were ligated. The viscera artery and lower extremity artery supply were restored gradually. No complication such as endoleak occurred. ConclusionFor endovascular repair of complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection, strategies combined with covering LSA, chimney technique, and hybrid operation of small incision could extend anchor zone, expand the range of endovascular repair of aortic dissection, improve curative effect, reduce complications.